목표지향적 번역이론과 '용인성'
Target-oriented translation theories and "acceptability"
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
“Acceptability”, related to its opposite “adequacy”, is a concept that is first defined in translation studies by Gideon Toury. In this field of research, adequacy can be connected with literal translation whereas acceptability may be related to free translation. We can therefore consider this concept as one of two binary concepts of translation studies, along with 'formal vs dynamic equivalence (Eugene Nida)', ‘documentary vs instrumental translation (Christiane Nord)’, etc. The researchers mentioned above, as well as the Paris School (ESIT), are known to develop target-oriented theories in Translation Studies. How, then, can their theories be connected with “acceptability”? This study tries to reconsider these three theories around this concept. On one hand, Nida's comprehension of acceptability seems to have been defined by “dynamic equivalence” as the identical response from readers of TT and ST. On the other hand, Skopos theory emphasizes acceptability for the translator. Finally, the ESIT considers this concept in the boundary of TT and ST. (단어수: 158)
Abstract
“Acceptability”, related to its opposite “adequacy”, is a concept that is first defined in translation studies by Gideon Toury. In this field of research, adequacy can be connected with literal translation whereas acceptability may be related to free translation. We can therefore consider this concept as one of two binary concepts of translation studies, along with 'formal vs dynamic equivalence (Eugene Nida)', ‘documentary vs instrumental translation (Christiane Nord)’, etc. The researchers mentioned above, as well as the Paris School (ESIT), are known to develop target-oriented theories in Translation Studies. How, then, can their theories be connected with “acceptability”? This study tries to reconsider these three theories around this concept. On one hand, Nida's comprehension of acceptability seems to have been defined by “dynamic equivalence” as the identical response from readers of TT and ST. On the other hand, Skopos theory emphasizes acceptability for the translator. Finally, the ESIT considers this concept in the boundary of TT and ST. (단어수: 158)
참고문헌 (24)
- Chemorion, D. C., "Considerations for acceptability in Bible translation", Verbum et Ecclesia, 30(2), pp.110~114 (2009)
- Gile, D., "Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training" (2009), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Hönig, H. G., "Positions, power and practice: functionalist approaches and translation quality assessment", Current Issues in Language & Society, 4(1), pp.6~34 (1997)
- Larsen, I., "The fourth criteria of translation", Notes on Translation, 15(1), pp.40~53 (2001)
- Lederer, M., "La traduction aujourd'hui: le modèle interpretatif" (1994), Hachette F.L.E.
- Martin de Leon, C., "Skopos and beyond: A critical study of funct; onalism", Target, 20(1), pp.1~28 (2008)
- Martínez Melis, N., "Évaluation et didactique de la traduction: le cas de la traduction dans la langue étrangère" (2001), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
- Munday, J., "Introducing translation studies: theories and applications" (2001), Routledge
- Nida, E. A., "Toward a Science of Translation" (1964), E. J. Brill
- Nida, E. A., "The theory and Practice of Translation" (1969), E. J. Brill
- Nida, E. A., "Intelligibility and acceptability in Bible translating", bible Translator, 39(3), pp.301~308 (1988)
- Nord, C., "Translating as a Purposeful Activity. in: Functionalist Approaches Explained" (1997), St. Jerome
- Nord, C., "Text Analysis in Translation: Theory, Methodology, and Didactic Application of a Model for Translation-Oriented Text Analysis" (2005), Rodopi
- Nord, C., "La traduction, une activité ciblée: introduction aux approches fonctionnalistes, Traduit de l'anglais par Beverly Adab" (2008), Artois presses université
- "Dictionary of translation science with terms of semiotics, textology, linguistics, stylistics"[URL]
- PACTE group, "Results of the validation of the PACTE Translation competence model: acceptability and decision making", Across Languages and Cultures, 10(2), pp.207~230 (2009)
- Rosales Sequeiros, X., "Degrees of acceptability in literary translation", Babel, 44(1), pp.1~14 (1998)
- Rydning, A. F., "Qu'est-ce qu'une traduction acceptable en B?: Les conditions d'acceptabilité de la traduction fonctionnelle réalisée dans la langue seconde du traducteur" (1991), University of Oslo
- Toury, G., "The nature and role of norms in literary translation, Literature and translation : new perspectives in literary studies : with a basic bibliography of books on translation studies", pp.83~100 (1978), Leuven
- Toury, G., "Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond" (1995), John Benjamins
- Vermeer, H. J., "A skopos Theory of Translation (Some Arguments for and against)" (1996), TEXTconTEXT
- Vermeer, H. J., "Skopos and commission in translational action, The translation studies reader", pp.221~232 (2000), Routledge
- Waddington, Ch., "Estudio comparativo de diferentes métodos de evaluación de traducción general (inglés-español)" (2000), Universidad Pontificia de Comillas
- Wendland, E. R., "Towards a"literary"translation of the scriptures:with special reference to a"poetic"rendition,Acta Theologica", Supplementum, 2, pp.164~201 (2001)