본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The effect of resin cements and primer on retentive force of zirconia copings bonded to zirconia abutments with insufficient retention

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of resin cements and primer on the retentive force of zirconia copings bonded to zirconia abutments with insufficient retention. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Zirconia blocks (Lava, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) were obtained and forty sets of zirconia abutments and copings were fabricated using CAD/CAM technology. They were grouped into 4 categories as follows, depending on the types of resin cements used, and whether the primer is applied or not:Panavia F2.0 (P), Panavia F2.0 using Primer (PRIME Plus, Bisco Inc, Schaumburg, IL, USA) (PZ), Superbond C&B (S), and Superbond C&B using Primer (SZ). For each of the groups, the cementation was conducted. The specimens were kept in sterilized water (37℃) for 24 hours. Retentive forces were tested and measured, and a statistical analysis was carried out. The nature of failure was recorded. RESULTS. The means and standard deviations of retentive force in Newton for each group were 265.15 ± 35.04 N (P), 318.21 ± 22.24 N (PZ), 445.13 ± 78.54 N (S) and 508.21 ± 79.48 N (SZ). Superbond C&B groups (S & SZ) showed significantly higher retentive force than Panavia F2.0 groups (P & PZ). In Panavia F2.0 groups, the use of primer was found to contribute to the increase of retentive force. On the other hand, in Superbond C&B groups, the use of primer did not influence the retention forces. Adhesive failure was observed in all groups. CONCLUSION. This study suggests that cementation of the zirconia abutments and zirconia copings with Superbond C&B have a higher retentive force than Panavia F2.0. When using Panavia F2.0, the use of primer increases the retentive force.

Abstract

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of resin cements and primer on the retentive force of zirconia copings bonded to zirconia abutments with insufficient retention. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Zirconia blocks (Lava, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) were obtained and forty sets of zirconia abutments and copings were fabricated using CAD/CAM technology. They were grouped into 4 categories as follows, depending on the types of resin cements used, and whether the primer is applied or not:Panavia F2.0 (P), Panavia F2.0 using Primer (PRIME Plus, Bisco Inc, Schaumburg, IL, USA) (PZ), Superbond C&B (S), and Superbond C&B using Primer (SZ). For each of the groups, the cementation was conducted. The specimens were kept in sterilized water (37℃) for 24 hours. Retentive forces were tested and measured, and a statistical analysis was carried out. The nature of failure was recorded. RESULTS. The means and standard deviations of retentive force in Newton for each group were 265.15 ± 35.04 N (P), 318.21 ± 22.24 N (PZ), 445.13 ± 78.54 N (S) and 508.21 ± 79.48 N (SZ). Superbond C&B groups (S & SZ) showed significantly higher retentive force than Panavia F2.0 groups (P & PZ). In Panavia F2.0 groups, the use of primer was found to contribute to the increase of retentive force. On the other hand, in Superbond C&B groups, the use of primer did not influence the retention forces. Adhesive failure was observed in all groups. CONCLUSION. This study suggests that cementation of the zirconia abutments and zirconia copings with Superbond C&B have a higher retentive force than Panavia F2.0. When using Panavia F2.0, the use of primer increases the retentive force.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. Anusavice KJ, "Recent developments in restorative dental ceramics", J Am Dent Assoc, 124, pp.72~84 (1993)
  2. Kelly JR, "Ceramics in dentistry: historical roots and current perspectives", J Prosthet Dent, 75, pp.18~32 (1996)
  3. Blatz MB, "Influence of surface treatment and simulated aging on bond strengths of luting agents to zirconia", Quintessence Int, 38, pp.745~753 (2007)
  4. Luthardt RG, "Reliability and properties of ground Y-TZP-zirconia ceramics", J Dent Res, 81, pp.487~491 (2002)
  5. Yildirim M, "Ceramic abutments-a new era in achieving optimal esthetics in implant dentistry", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 20, pp.81~91 (2000)
  6. Ozcan M, "Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics", Dent Mater, 19, pp.725~731 (2003)
  7. Zhang Y, "Damage accumulation and fatigue life of particle-abraded ceramics", Int J Prosthodont, 19, pp.442~448 (2006)
  8. Zhang Y, "Effect of sandblasting on the long-term performance of dental ceramics", J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 71, pp.381~386 (2004)
  9. Bottino MA, "Effect of surface treatments on the resin bond to zirconium-based ceramic", Int J Prosthodont, 18, pp.60~65 (2005)
  10. Dérand P, "Bond strength of luting cements to zirconium oxide ceramics", Int J Prosthodont, 13, pp.131~135 (2000)
  11. Kern M, "Bonding to zirconia ceramic: adhesion methods and their durability", Dent Mater, 14, pp.64~71 (1998)
  12. Emms M, "The effects of abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cementretained, implant-supported restorations", J Prosthodont, 16, pp.3~9 (2007)
  13. Janda R, "A new adhesive technology for all-ceramics", Dent Mater, 19, pp.567~573 (2003)
  14. Lüthy H, "Effect of thermocycling on bond strength of luting cements to zirconia ceramic", Dent Mater, 22, pp.195~200 (2006)
  15. Blatz MB, "In vitro evaluation of shear bond strengths of resin to densely-sintered high-purity zirconium-oxide ceramic after long-term storage and thermal cycling", J Prosthet Dent, 91, pp.356~362 (2004)
  16. Atsu SS, "Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin", J Prosthet Dent, 95, pp.430~436 (2006)
  17. Ozcan M, "Effect of various surface conditioning methods on the adhesion of dual-cure resin cement with MDP functional monomer to zirconia after thermal aging", Dent Mater J, 27, pp.99~104 (2008)
  18. Wegner SM, "Long-term resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic", J Adhes Dent, 2, pp.139~147 (2000)
  19. Ernst CP, "In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents", J Prosthet Dent, 93, pp.551~558 (2005)
  20. 이호정, "Effect of surface treatment methods on the shear bond strength of resincement to zirconia ceramic", 대한치과보철학회지, 45(6), pp.743~752 (2007), 대한치과보철학회
  21. 김창훈, "Zirconia ceramic의 표면처리 방법이 레진시멘트의 결합강도에 미치는 영향", 대한치과보철학회지, 42(4), pp.386~396 (2004), 대한치과보철학회
  22. Lindgren J, "Effect of surface treatments and aging in water on bond strength to zirconia", Oper Dent, 33, pp.675~681 (2008)
  23. 이정행, "샌드블라스팅과 프라이머가 지르코니아와 레진시멘트의 전단결합강도에 미치는 영향", 대한치과보철학회지, 49(01), pp.49~56 (2011), 대한치과보철학회
  24. Magne P, "New zirconia primer improves bond strength of resin-based cements", Dent Mater, 26, pp.345~352 (2010)
  25. Michalakis KX, "Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 18, pp.719~728 (2003)
  26. Abbo B, "Resistance to dislodgement of zirconia copings cemented onto titanium abutments of different heights", J Prosthet Dent, 99, pp.25~29 (2008)
  27. Ramp MH, "Tensile bond strengths of provisional luting agents used with an implant system", J Prosthet Dent, 81, pp.510~514 (1999)
  28. Covey DA, "Effects of abutment size and luting cement type on the uniaxial retention force of implant-supported crowns", J Prosthet Dent, 83, pp.344~348 (2000)
  29. Squier RS, "Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 16, pp.793~798 (2001)
  30. Mansour A, "Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements", Clin Oral Implants Res, 13, pp.343~348 (2002)
  31. Ebert A, "Retention of zirconia ceramic copings bonded to titanium abutments", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 22, pp.921~927 (2007)
  32. Thompson JY, "Adhesion", cementation to zirconia and other non-silicate ceramics: where are we now, 2011, pp.27, 71~82
  33. Behr M, "The bond strength of the resin-to-zirconia interface using different bonding concepts", J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 4, pp.2~8 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

Effect of liners and primers on tensile bond strength between zirconia and resin-based luting agent고경호, 박찬진, 조리라, 조은혜, 허윤혁대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2018 · 제10권 제5호Influence of cement thickness on resin-zirconia microtensile bond strength김선재, 심준성, 안진수, 이태훈, 한종현대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2011 · 제3권 제3호The comparison of bond strength of zirconia ceramic to chemically adhesive resin cements with functional monomers and conventional resin cements used in geriatric dentistry김성훈, 노경호, 하승룡대한노년치의학회 · 대한노년치의학회지2024 · 제20권 제1호Impact of multiple firings and resin cement type on shear bond strength between zirconia and resin cementsEce İrem Oğuz, Merve Erdoğ Özgür, Sadullah Üçtaşlı, Sercan Sungur대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2020 · 제12권 제4호Effects of abutment diameter, luting agent type, and re-cementation on the retention of implant-supported CAD/CAM metal copings over short abutmentsFereshteh Hosseini Ghavam, Kaveh Yaghmaei, Parviz Amini, Sina Safari대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2018 · 제10권 제1호Effect of universal adhesive pretreatments on the bond strength durability of conventional and adhesive resin cements to zirconia ceramic권태엽, 김영경, 박진우, 이두형, Seung-Hee Han대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2024 · 제16권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)