Effects of abutment diameter, luting agent type, and re-cementation on the retention of implant-supported CAD/CAM metal copings over short abutments
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of abutment diameter, cement type, and re-cementation on the retention of implant-supported CAD/CAM metal copings over short abutments. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Sixty abutments with two different diameters, the height of which was reduced to 3 mm, were vertically mounted in acrylic resin blocks with matching implant analogues. The specimens were divided into 2 diameter groups: 4.5 mm and 5.5 mm (n=30). For each abutment a CAD/CAM metal coping was manufactured, with an occlusal loop. Each group was sub-divided into 3 sub-groups (n=10). In each subgroup, a different cement type was used: resin-modified glass-ionomer, resin cement and zinc-oxide-eugenol. After incubation and thermocycling, the removal force was measured using a universal testing machine at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min. In zinc-oxide-eugenol group, after removal of the coping, the cement remnants were completely cleaned and the copings were re-cemented with resin cement and re-tested. Two-way ANOVA, post hoc Tukey tests, and paired t-test were used to analyze data (α=.05). RESULTS. The highest pulling force was registered in the resin cement group (414.8 N), followed by the re-cementation group (380.5 N). Increasing the diameter improved the retention significantly (P=.006). The difference in retention between the cemented and recemented copings was not statistically significant (P=.40). CONCLUSION. Resin cement provided retention almost twice as strong as that of the RMGI. Increasing the abutment diameter improved retention significantly. Re-cementation with resin cement did not exhibit any difference from the initial cementation with resin cement.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of abutment diameter, cement type, and re-cementation on the retention of implant-supported CAD/CAM metal copings over short abutments. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Sixty abutments with two different diameters, the height of which was reduced to 3 mm, were vertically mounted in acrylic resin blocks with matching implant analogues. The specimens were divided into 2 diameter groups: 4.5 mm and 5.5 mm (n=30). For each abutment a CAD/CAM metal coping was manufactured, with an occlusal loop. Each group was sub-divided into 3 sub-groups (n=10). In each subgroup, a different cement type was used: resin-modified glass-ionomer, resin cement and zinc-oxide-eugenol. After incubation and thermocycling, the removal force was measured using a universal testing machine at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min. In zinc-oxide-eugenol group, after removal of the coping, the cement remnants were completely cleaned and the copings were re-cemented with resin cement and re-tested. Two-way ANOVA, post hoc Tukey tests, and paired t-test were used to analyze data (α=.05). RESULTS. The highest pulling force was registered in the resin cement group (414.8 N), followed by the re-cementation group (380.5 N). Increasing the diameter improved the retention significantly (P=.006). The difference in retention between the cemented and recemented copings was not statistically significant (P=.40). CONCLUSION. Resin cement provided retention almost twice as strong as that of the RMGI. Increasing the abutment diameter improved retention significantly. Re-cementation with resin cement did not exhibit any difference from the initial cementation with resin cement.
참고문헌 (39)
- Abbo B, "Resistance to dislodgement of zirconia copings cemented onto titanium abutments of different heights", J Prosthet Dent, 99, pp.25~29 (2008)[DOI]
- Mish CE, "Dental implant prosthetics", pp.21~22 (2015), Elsevier Co.
- Hebel KS, "Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry", J Prosthet Dent, 77, pp.28~35 (1997)[DOI]
- Chee WW, "Retrievable cemented implant restorations", J Prosthodont, 7, pp.120~125 (1998)[DOI]
- Chee W, "Cemented versus screw-retained implant prostheses: which is better?", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 14, pp.137~141 (1999)
- Guncu MB, "Comparison of 3 luting agents on retention of implant-supported crowns on 2 different abutments", Implant Dent, 20, pp.349~353 (2011)[DOI]
- Akca K, "Comparison of uniaxial resistance forces of cements used with implant-supported crowns", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 17, pp.536~542 (2002)
- Bresciano M, "Retention of luting agents on implant abutments of different height and taper", Clin Oral Implants Res, 16, pp.594~598 (2005)[DOI]
- Kim Y, "The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns", J Prosthet Dent, 95, pp.450~455 (2006)[DOI]
- Akin H, "Effect of various surface treatments on the retention properties of titanium to implant restorative cement", Lasers Med Sci, 27, pp.1183~1187 (2012)[DOI]
- Qeblawi DM, "The effect of zirconia surface treatment on flexural strength and shear bond strength to a resin cement", J Prosthet Dent, 103, pp.210~220 (2010)[DOI]
- Kent DK, "Retention of cemented implant-supported restorations", J Prosthodont, 6, pp.193~196 (1997)[DOI]
- Pan YH, "Effect of luting agents on retention of dental implant-supported prostheses", J Oral Implantol, 41, pp.596~599 (2015)[DOI]
- Michalakis KX, "Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 18, pp.719~728 (2003)
- Sahu N, "Comparison of the effect of implant abutment surface modifications on retention of implant-supported restoration with a polymer based cement", J Clin Diagn Res, 8, pp.239~242 (2014)
- Michalakis K, "The effect of thermal cycling and air abrasion on cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 22, pp.569~574 (2007)
- Lee DH, "Shear bond strength of porcelain to a new millable alloy and a conventional castable alloy", J Prosthet Dent, 113, pp.329~335 (2015)[DOI]
- Lee JH, "An accelerated technique for a ceramic-pressed-tometal restoration with CAD", CAM technology, 2014, pp.112, 1021~1023
- Suleiman SH, "Fracture strength of porcelain fused to metal crowns made of cast, milled or laser-sintered cobalt-chromium", Acta Odontol Scand, 71, pp.1280~1289 (2013)[DOI]
- Kim KB, "Three-dimensional evaluation of gaps associated with fixed dental prostheses fabricated with new technologies", J Prosthet Dent, 112, pp.1432~1436 (2014)[DOI]
- Matthias Rödiger, "Evaluation of removal forces of implant-supported zirconia copings depending on abutment geometry, luting agent and cleaning method during re-cementation", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 6(3), pp.233~240 (2014), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Farzin M, "Effect of abutment modification and cement type on retention of cement-retained implant supported crowns", J Dent (Tehran), 11, pp.256~262 (2014)
- Ayad MF, "The effect of recementation on crown retention", Int J Prosthodont, 11, pp.177~182 (1998)
- Felton DA, "Recementation of dental castings with zinc phosphate cement: effect on cement bond strength", J Prosthet Dent, 58, pp.579~583 (1987)[DOI]
- Ayad MF, "Influence of tooth preparation taper and cement type on recementation strength of complete metal crowns", J Prosthet Dent, 102, pp.354~361 (2009)[DOI]
- Cano-Batalla J, "Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 27, pp.36~41 (2012)
- Carnaggio TV, "Retention of CAD", CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area, 2012, pp.21, 523~528
- Covey DA, "Effects of abutment size and luting cement type on the uniaxial retention force of implant-supported crowns", J Prosthet Dent, 83, pp.344~348 (2000)[DOI]
- Nejatidanesh F, "Retentiveness of implant-supported metal copings using different luting agents", Dent Res J (Isfahan), 9, pp.13~18 (2012)[DOI]
- Nejatidanesh F, "Effect of surface treatment on the retention of implant-supported zirconia restorations over short abutments", J Prosthet Dent, 112, pp.38~44 (2014)[DOI]
- Sadig WM, "Effects of surface conditioning on the retentiveness of titanium crowns over short implant abutments", Implant Dent, 16, pp.387~396 (2007)[DOI]
- White SN, "Film thickness of new adhesive luting agents", J Prosthet Dent, 67, pp.782~785 (1992)[DOI]
- Bernal G, "The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations", J Prosthodont, 12, pp.111~115 (2003)[DOI]
- Pinelli LA, "In vitro comparisons of casting retention on implant abutments among commercially available and experimental castor oil-containing dental luting agents", J Prosthet Dent, 109, pp.319~324 (2013)[DOI]
- Kokubo Y, "Retention of zirconia copings on zirconia implant abutments cemented with provisional luting agents", J Oral Rehabil, 37, pp.48~53 (2010)[DOI]
- Pan YH, "Comparison of 7 luting protocols and their effect on the retention and marginal leakage of a cement-retained dental implant restoration", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 21, pp.587~592 (2006)
- Rappelli G, "In vitro retentive strength of metal superstructures cemented to solid abutments", Minerva Stomatol, 57, pp.95~101 (2008)
- Garg P, "Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prosthesis: An in vitro study", J Oral Implantol, 40, pp.649~654 (2014)[DOI]
- Ebert A, "Retention of zirconia ceramic copings bonded to titanium abutments", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 22, pp.921~927 (2007)