Effect of liners and primers on tensile bond strength between zirconia and resin-based luting agent
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The effect of silica-based glass-ceramic liners on the tensile bond strength between zirconia and resin-based luting agent was evaluated and compared with the effect of 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP)-containing primers. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Titanium abutments and zirconia crowns (n = 60) were fabricated, and the adhesive surfaces of the specimens were treated by airborne-particle abrasion. The specimens were divided into 5 groups based on surface treatment: a control group, 2 primer groups (MP: Monobond Plus; ZP: Z Prime Plus), and 2 liner groups (PL: P-containing Liner; PFL: P-free Liner). All specimens were cemented with self-adhesive resin-based luting agent. After 24-hour water storage and thermocycling (5,000 cycles, 5℃/55℃), the tensile bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine. Failure mode analysis and elemental analysis on the bonding interface were performed. The data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test, Dunn’s post hoc test, and Fisher’s exact test. RESULTS. The liner groups and primer groups showed significantly higher tensile bond strengths than that of the control group (P<.05). PFL showed a significantly higher tensile bond strength than the primer groups (P<.05). The percentage of mixed failure was higher in the primer groups than in the control group (P<.001), and all the specimens showed mixed failure in the liner groups (P<.001). A chemical reaction area was observed at the bonding interface between zirconia and liner. CONCLUSION. The application of liner significantly increased the tensile bond strength between zirconia and resin-based luting agent. PFL was more effective than MDP-containing primers in improving the tensile bond strength with the resin-based luting agent.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The effect of silica-based glass-ceramic liners on the tensile bond strength between zirconia and resin-based luting agent was evaluated and compared with the effect of 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP)-containing primers. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Titanium abutments and zirconia crowns (n = 60) were fabricated, and the adhesive surfaces of the specimens were treated by airborne-particle abrasion. The specimens were divided into 5 groups based on surface treatment: a control group, 2 primer groups (MP: Monobond Plus; ZP: Z Prime Plus), and 2 liner groups (PL: P-containing Liner; PFL: P-free Liner). All specimens were cemented with self-adhesive resin-based luting agent. After 24-hour water storage and thermocycling (5,000 cycles, 5℃/55℃), the tensile bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine. Failure mode analysis and elemental analysis on the bonding interface were performed. The data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test, Dunn’s post hoc test, and Fisher’s exact test. RESULTS. The liner groups and primer groups showed significantly higher tensile bond strengths than that of the control group (P<.05). PFL showed a significantly higher tensile bond strength than the primer groups (P<.05). The percentage of mixed failure was higher in the primer groups than in the control group (P<.001), and all the specimens showed mixed failure in the liner groups (P<.001). A chemical reaction area was observed at the bonding interface between zirconia and liner. CONCLUSION. The application of liner significantly increased the tensile bond strength between zirconia and resin-based luting agent. PFL was more effective than MDP-containing primers in improving the tensile bond strength with the resin-based luting agent.
참고문헌 (30)
- Yi YA, "The effect of sandblasting and different primers on shear bond strength between yttria-tetragonal zirconia polycrystal ceramic and a self-adhesive resin cement", Oper Dent, 40, pp.63~71 (2015)[DOI]
- Schmitter M, "Clinical performance of long-span zirconia frameworks for fixed dental prostheses: 5-year results", J Oral Rehabil, 39, pp.552~557 (2012)[DOI]
- Ortorp A, "A 5-year retrospective study of survival of zirconia single crowns fitted in a private clinical setting", J Dent, 40, pp.527~530 (2012)[DOI]
- Rinke S, "Prospective evaluation of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 7-year clinical results", Int J Prosthodont, 26, pp.164~171 (2013)[DOI]
- Heintze SD, "Survival of zirconia- and metal-supported fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review", Int J Prosthodont, 23, pp.493~502 (2010)
- Kato H, "Improved bonding of adhesive resin to sintered porcelain with the combination of acid etching and a two-liquid silane conditioner", J Oral Rehabil, 28, pp.102~108 (2001)[DOI]
- Cavalcanti AN, "Bond strength of resin cements to a zirconia ceramic with different surface treatments", Oper Dent, 34, pp.280~287 (2009)[DOI]
- Tzanakakis EG, "Is there a potential for durable adhesion to zirconia restorations? A systematic review", J Prosthet Dent, 115, pp.9~19 (2016)[DOI]
- Casucci A, "Influence of different surface treatments on surface zirconia frameworks", J Dent, 37, pp.891~897 (2009)[DOI]
- Ntala P, "Development and testing of multi-phase glazes for adhesive bonding to zirconia substrates", J Dent, 38, pp.773~781 (2010)[DOI]
- Chen C, "Nanosilica coating for bonding improvements to zirconia", Int J Nanomedicine, 8, pp.4053~4062 (2013)
- Papia E, "Bonding between oxide ceramics and adhesive cement systems: a systematic review", J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 102, pp.395~413 (2014)[DOI]
- Chen L, "Bonding of primed zirconia ceramics: evidence of chemical bonding and improved bond strengths", Am J Dent, 25, pp.103~108 (2012)
- Kosmac T, "Strength and reliability of surface treated Y-TZP dental ceramics", J Biomed Mater Res, 53, pp.304~313 (2000)[DOI]
- Blatz MB, "In vitro evaluation of shear bond strengths of resin to densely-sintered high-purity zirconium-oxide ceramic after long-term storage and thermal cycling", J Prosthet Dent, 91, pp.356~362 (2004)[DOI]
- Kern M, "Bonding to glass infiltrated alumina ceramic: adhesive methods and their durability", J Prosthet Dent, 73, pp.240~249 (1995)[DOI]
- Awliya W, "Shear bond strength of a resin cement to densely sintered high-purity alumina with various surface conditions", Acta Odontol Scand, 56, pp.9~13 (1998)[DOI]
- Blixt M, "Bonding to densely sintered alumina surfaces: effect of sandblasting and silica coating on shear bond strength of luting cements", Int J Prosthodont, 13, pp.221~226 (2000)
- Khan AA, "Recent trends in surface treatment methods for bonding composite cement to zirconia: A reveiw", J Adhes Dent, 19, pp.7~19 (2017)
- Matinlinna JP, "Evaluation of resin adhesion to zirconia ceramic using some organosilanes", Dent Mater, 22, pp.824~831 (2006)[DOI]
- Chen L, "Evaluation of silica-coating techniques for zirconia bonding", Am J Dent, 24, pp.79~84 (2011)
- Heikkinen TT, "Effect of operating air pressure on tribochemical silica-coating", Acta Odontol Scand, 65, pp.241~248 (2007)[DOI]
- Yang B, "Influence of air-abrasion on zirconia ceramic bonding using an adhesive composite resin", Dent Mater, 26, pp.44~50 (2010)[DOI]
- Kitayama S, "Effect of an internal coating technique on tensile bond strengths of resin cements to zirconia ceramics", Dent Mater J, 28, pp.446~453 (2009)[DOI]
- Lung CY, "The effect of silica-coating by sol-gel process on resin-zirconia bonding", Dent Mater J, 32, pp.165~172 (2013)[DOI]
- Lee ES, "Effect of silica-containing glasseceramic liner treatment on zirconia coping retention", J Prosthet Dent (2018)
- Aboushelib MN, "Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part II: Zirconia veneering ceramics", Dent Mater, 22, pp.857~863 (2006)[DOI]
- Kawai Y, "Microstructure evaluation of the interface between dental zirconia ceramics and veneering porcelain", Nano Biomed, 2, pp.31~36 (2010)
- Durand JC, "Confocal Raman microscopic analysis of the zirconia", feldspathic ceramic interface, 2012, pp.28, 661~671
- Holand W, "Glass ceramic technology. 2nd.", pp.32~45 (2012), John Wiley & Sons