Load-bearing capacity of various CAD/CAM monolithic molar crowns under recommended occlusal thickness and reduced occlusal thickness conditions
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The goal of this study was to evaluate the fracture resistances of various monolithic crowns fabricated by computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) with different thickness. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Test dies were fabricated as mandibular molar forms with occlusal reductions using CAD/CAM. With different occlusal thickness (1.0 or 1.5 mm), a polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (Enamic, EN), and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (Suprinity, SU and Celtra-Duo, CD) were used to fabricate molar crowns. Lithium disilicate (e.max CAD, EM) crowns (occlusal: 1.5 mm) were fabricated as control. Seventy crowns (n=10 per group) were bonded to abutments and stored in water for 24 hours. A universal testing machine was used to apply load to crown until fracture. The fractured specimens were examined with a scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS. The type of ceramics and the occlusal thickness showed a significant interaction. With a recommended thickness (1.5 mm), the SU revealed the mean load similar to the EM, higher compared with those of the EN and CD. The fracture loads in a reduced thickness (1.0 mm) were similar among the SU, CD, and EN. The mean fracture load of the SU and CD enhanced significantly when the occlusal thickness increased, whereas that of the EN did not. CONCLUSION. The fracture loads of monolithic crowns were differently influenced by the changes in occlusal thickness, depending on the type of ceramics. Within the limitations of this study, all the tested crowns withstood the physiological masticatory loads both at the recommended and reduced occlusal thickness.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The goal of this study was to evaluate the fracture resistances of various monolithic crowns fabricated by computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) with different thickness. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Test dies were fabricated as mandibular molar forms with occlusal reductions using CAD/CAM. With different occlusal thickness (1.0 or 1.5 mm), a polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (Enamic, EN), and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (Suprinity, SU and Celtra-Duo, CD) were used to fabricate molar crowns. Lithium disilicate (e.max CAD, EM) crowns (occlusal: 1.5 mm) were fabricated as control. Seventy crowns (n=10 per group) were bonded to abutments and stored in water for 24 hours. A universal testing machine was used to apply load to crown until fracture. The fractured specimens were examined with a scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS. The type of ceramics and the occlusal thickness showed a significant interaction. With a recommended thickness (1.5 mm), the SU revealed the mean load similar to the EM, higher compared with those of the EN and CD. The fracture loads in a reduced thickness (1.0 mm) were similar among the SU, CD, and EN. The mean fracture load of the SU and CD enhanced significantly when the occlusal thickness increased, whereas that of the EN did not. CONCLUSION. The fracture loads of monolithic crowns were differently influenced by the changes in occlusal thickness, depending on the type of ceramics. Within the limitations of this study, all the tested crowns withstood the physiological masticatory loads both at the recommended and reduced occlusal thickness.
참고문헌 (50)
- Wang X, "A systematic review of all-ceramic crowns: clinical fracture rates in relation to restored tooth type", Int J Prosthodont, 25, pp.441~450 (2012)
- Pjetursson BE, "A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of allceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part I: Single crowns", Clin Oral Implants Res, 18, pp.73~85 (2007)
- Raigrodski AJ, "Survival and complications of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses:a systematic review", J Prosthet Dent, 107, pp.170~177 (2012)
- Sailer I, "All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs)", Dent Mater, 31, pp.603~623 (2015)
- Miyazaki T, "Current status of zirconia restoration", J Prosthodont Res, 57, pp.236~261 (2013)
- Raigrodski AJ, "Clinical efficacy of veneered zirconium dioxide-based posterior partial fixed dental prostheses: five-year results", J Prosthet Dent, 108, pp.214~222 (2012)
- Pieger S, "Clinical outcomes of lithium disilicate single crowns and partial fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review", J Prosthet Dent, 112, pp.22~30 (2014)
- Agustín-Panadero R, "Zirconia in fixed prosthesis. A literature review", J Clin Exp Dent, 6, pp.e66~e73 (2014)
- Larsson C, "The clinical success of zirconiabased crowns: a systematic review", Int J Prosthodont, 27, pp.33~43 (2014)
- Beuer F, "In vitro performance of full-contour zirconia single crowns", Dent Mater, 28, pp.449~456 (2012)
- Denry I, "Emerging ceramic-based materials for dentistry", J Dent Res, 93, pp.1235~1242 (2014)
- Zhao K, "Influence of veneer and cyclic loading on failure behavior of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic molar crowns", Dent Mater, 30, pp.164~171 (2014)
- Guess PC, "Monolithic CAD", CAM lithium disilicate versus veneered Y-TZP crowns: comparison of failure modes and reliability after fatigue, 2010, pp.23, 434~442
- Batson ER, "Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD", CAM technology, 2014, pp.112, 770~777
- Li RW, "Ceramic dental biomaterials and CAD", CAM technology: state of the art, 2014, pp.58, 208~216
- He LH, "A novel polymer infiltrated ceramic dental material", Dent Mater, 27, pp.527~534 (2011)
- Coldea A, "Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials", Dent Mater, 29, pp.419~426 (2013)
- Coldea A, "In-vitro strength degradation of dental ceramics and novel PICN material by sharp indentation", J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 26, pp.34~42 (2013)
- Coldea A, "Hertzian contact response and damage tolerance of dental ceramics", J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 34, pp.124~133 (2014)
- Mörmann WH, "Wear characteristics of current aesthetic dental re-storative CAD", CAM materials: two-body wear, gloss retention, roughness and Martens hardness, 2013, pp.20, 113~125
- Coldea A, "Damage tolerance of indirect restorative materials (including PICN) after simulated bur adjustments", Dent Mater, 31, pp.684~694 (2015)
- Ankyu S, "Fatigue analysis of computer-aided design", computer-aided manufacturing resinbased composite vs. lithium disilicate glass-ceramic, 2016, pp.124, 387~395
- Zesewitz TF, "Fracture resistance of a selection of full-contour all-ceramic crowns: an in vitro study", Int J Prosthodont, 27, pp.264~266 (2014)
- Güncü MB, "Zirconiabased crowns up to 5 years in function: a retrospective clinical study and evaluation of prosthetic restorations and failures", Int J Prosthodont, 28, pp.152~157 (2015)
- Kikuchi M, "The association among occlusal contacts, clenching effort, and bite force distribution in man", J Dent Res, 76, pp.1316~1325 (1997)
- Ferrario VF, "Maximal bite forces in healthy young adults as predicted by surface electromyography", J Dent, 32, pp.451~457 (2004)
- Varga S, "Maximum voluntary molar bite force in subjects with normal occlusion", Eur J Orthod, 33, pp.427~433 (2011)
- Wegner LD, "The fracture toughness behaviour of interpenetrating phase composites", Int J Mech Sci, 43, pp.1771~1791 (2001)
- Thompson VP, "Dental ceramics and the molar crown testing ground", J Appl Oral Sci, 12, pp.26~36 (2004)
- Chen C, "The fracture resistance of a CAD", CAM Resin Nano Ceramic (RNC) and a CAD ceramic at different thicknesses, 2014, pp.30, 954~962
- Preis V, "Influence of cementation on in vitro performance, marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of CAD", CAM-fabricated ZLS molar crowns, 2015, pp.31, 1363~1369
- Nordahl N, "Fracture strength of ceramic monolithic crown systems of different thickness", J Oral Sci, 57, pp.255~261 (2015)
- Schultheis S, "Monolithic and bi-layer CAD", CAM lithium-disilicate versus metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses: comparison of fracture loads and failure modes after fatigue, 2013, pp.17, 1407~1413
- Coelho PG, "Laboratory simulation of Y-TZP all-ceramic crown clinical failures", J Dent Res, 88, pp.382~386 (2009)
- 최유성, "In vitro evaluation of fracture strength of zirconia restoration veneered with various ceramic materials", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 4(3), pp.162~169 (2012), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Harada A, "Fracture resistance of computer-aided design", computer-aided manufacturing-generated composite resin-based molar crowns, 2015, pp.123, 122~129
- Yucel MT, "Influence of the supporting die structures on the fracture strength of all-ceramic materials", Clin Oral Investig, 16, pp.1105~1110 (2012)
- Dittmer MP, "Influence of the supporting structure on stress distribution in all-ceramic FPDs", Int J Prosthodont, 23, pp.63~68 (2010)
- Scherrer SS, "The fracture resistance of all-ceramic crowns on supporting structures with different elastic moduli", Int J Prosthodont, 6, pp.462~467 (1993)
- Chun K, "Comparison of mechanical property and role between enamel and dentin in the human teeth", J Dent Biomech, 5 (2014)
- Stanford WJ, "Determination of some compressive properties of human enamel and dentin", J Am Dent Assoc, 57, pp.487~495 (1958)
- Arcís RW, "Mechanical properties of visible light-cured resins reinforced with hydroxyapatite for dental restoration", Dent Mater, 18, pp.49~57 (2002)
- Øilo M, "Clinically relevant fracture testing of all-ceramic crowns", Dent Mater, 29, pp.815~823 (2013)
- Nakamura K, "Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia molar crowns with reduced thickness", Acta Odontol Scand, 73, pp.602~608 (2015)
- Johansson C, "Fracture strength of monolithic all-ceramic crowns made of high translucent yttrium oxide-stabilized zirconium dioxide compared to porcelain-veneered crowns and lithium disilicate crowns", Acta Odontol Scand, 72, pp.145~153 (2014)
- Sun T, "Load-bearing capacity and the recommended thickness of dental monolithic zirconia single crowns", J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 35, pp.93~101 (2014)
- de Kok P, "Mechanical performance of implant-supported posterior crowns", J Prosthet Dent, 114, pp.59~66 (2015)
- Seydler B, "In vitro fracture load of monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic molar crowns with different wall thicknesses", Clin Oral Investig, 18, pp.1165~1171 (2014)
- Campos RE, "Crown fracture: Failure load, stress distribution, and fractographic analysis", J Prosthet Dent, 114, pp.447~455 (2015)
- Harada A, "Fracture resistance of computer-aided design", computer-aided manufacturing-generated composite resin-based molar crowns, 2015, pp.123, 122~129