Fracture resistance of implantsupported monolithic crowns cemented to zirconia hybridabutments: zirconia-based crowns vs. lithium disilicate crowns
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the fracture resistance under chewing simulation of implant-supported posterior restorations (crowns cemented to hybrid-abutments) made of different all-ceramic materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Monolithic zirconia (MZr) and monolithic lithium disilicate (MLD) crowns for mandibular first molar were fabricated using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing technology and then cemented to zirconia hybrid-abutments (Ti-based). Each group was divided into two subgroups (n=10): (A) control group, crowns were subjected to single load to fracture; (B) test group, crowns underwent chewing simulation using multiple loads for 1.2 million cycles at 1.2 Hz with simultaneous thermocycling between 5캜 and 55캜. Data was statistically analyzed with one-way ANOVA and a Post-Hoc test. RESULTS. All tested crowns survived chewing simulation resulting in 100% survival rate. However, wear facets were observed on all the crowns at the occlusal contact point. Fracture load of monolithic lithium disilicate crowns was statistically significantly lower than that of monolithic zirconia crowns. Also, fracture load was significantly reduced in both of the all-ceramic materials after exposure to chewing simulation and thermocycling. Crowns of all test groups exhibited cohesive fracture within the monolithic crown structure only, and no abutment fractures or screw loosening were observed. CONCLUSION. When supported by implants, monolithic zirconia restorations cemented to hybrid abutments withstand masticatory forces. Also, fatigue loading accompanied by simultaneous thermocycling significantly reduces the strength of both of the all-ceramic materials. Moreover, further research is needed to define potentials, limits, and long-term serviceability of thematerials and hybrid abutments.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the fracture resistance under chewing simulation of implant-supported posterior restorations (crowns cemented to hybrid-abutments) made of different all-ceramic materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Monolithic zirconia (MZr) and monolithic lithium disilicate (MLD) crowns for mandibular first molar were fabricated using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing technology and then cemented to zirconia hybrid-abutments (Ti-based). Each group was divided into two subgroups (n=10): (A) control group, crowns were subjected to single load to fracture; (B) test group, crowns underwent chewing simulation using multiple loads for 1.2 million cycles at 1.2 Hz with simultaneous thermocycling between 5캜 and 55캜. Data was statistically analyzed with one-way ANOVA and a Post-Hoc test. RESULTS. All tested crowns survived chewing simulation resulting in 100% survival rate. However, wear facets were observed on all the crowns at the occlusal contact point. Fracture load of monolithic lithium disilicate crowns was statistically significantly lower than that of monolithic zirconia crowns. Also, fracture load was significantly reduced in both of the all-ceramic materials after exposure to chewing simulation and thermocycling. Crowns of all test groups exhibited cohesive fracture within the monolithic crown structure only, and no abutment fractures or screw loosening were observed. CONCLUSION. When supported by implants, monolithic zirconia restorations cemented to hybrid abutments withstand masticatory forces. Also, fatigue loading accompanied by simultaneous thermocycling significantly reduces the strength of both of the all-ceramic materials. Moreover, further research is needed to define potentials, limits, and long-term serviceability of thematerials and hybrid abutments.
참고문헌 (52)
- Kapos T, "CAD", CAM technology for implant abutments, crowns, and superstructures, 2014, pp.29, 117~136
- Santos MJ, "Current all-ceramic systems in dentistry: a review", Compend Contin Educ Dent, 36, pp.31~37 (2015)
- Pallis K, "Fracture resistance of three all-ceramic restorative systems for posterior applications", J Prosthet Dent, 91, pp.561~569 (2004)[DOI]
- Batson ER, "Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD", CAM technology, 2014, pp.112, 770~777
- Larsson C, "The clinical success of zirconiabased crowns: a systematic review", Int J Prosthodont, 27, pp.33~43 (2014)[DOI]
- Fasbinder DJ, "A clinical evaluation of chairside lithium disilicate CAD", CAM crowns: a two-year report, 2010, pp.141, 10S~14S
- Avivi-Arber L, "Clinical effectiveness of implantsupported single-tooth replacement: the Toronto Study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 11, pp.311~321 (1996)
- Scheller H, "A 5-year multicenter study on implant-supported single crown restorations", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 13, pp.212~218 (1998)
- Prestipino V, "Esthetic high-strength implant abutments. Part I", J Esthet Dent, 5, pp.29~36 (1993)[DOI]
- Prestipino V, "Esthetic high-strength implant abutments. Part II", J Esthet Dent, 5, pp.63~68 (1993)[DOI]
- Glauser R, "Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study", Int J Prosthodont, 17, pp.285~290 (2004)
- Sailer I, "In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 24, pp.850~858 (2009)
- Nascimento C, "Bacterial adhesion on the titanium and zirconia abutment surfaces", Clin Oral Implants Res, 25, pp.337~343 (2014)
- Gomes AL, "Zirconia implant abutments: a review", Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 16, pp.e50~e55 (2011)
- Kohal RJ, "Ceramic abutments and ceramic oral implants. An update", Periodontol 2000, 47, pp.224~243 (2008)[DOI]
- Lin WS, "Use of prefabricated titanium abutments and customized anatomic lithium disilicate structures for cement-retained implant restorations in the esthetic zone", J Prosthet Dent, 111, pp.181~185 (2014)[DOI]
- Hornbrook D, "Case report using the "H" abutment: achieving esthetics, strength, and predictability for the anterior implant", Compend Contin Educ Dent, 36, pp.192~ (2015)
- Traini T, "Esthetic outcome of an immediately placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implant restored with a custom-made zirconia-ceramic abutment and crown: a staged treatment", Quintessence Int, 42, pp.103~108 (2011)
- Selz CF, "Full-mouth rehabilitation with monolithic CAD", CAM-fabricated hybrid and all-ceramic materials: A case report and 3-year follow up, 2016, pp.47, 115~121
- Rosentritt M, "In vitro performance of zirconia and titanium implant", abutment systems for anterior application, 2014, pp.42, 1019~1026
- Silva NR, "Reliability and Failure Modes of a Hybrid Ceramic Abutment Prototype", J Prosthodont (2016)
- Honda J, "Fracture resistance of implant-supported screw-retained zirconia-based molar restorations", Clin Oral Implants Res, 28, pp.1119~1126 (2017)[DOI]
- Kelly JR, "Fatigue Behavior of Computer- Aided Design", Computer-Assisted Manufacture Ceramic Abutments as a Function of Design and Ceramics Processing, 2016, pp.31, 601~609
- Stimmelmayr M, "Fracture resistance of different implant abutments supporting all-ceramic single crowns after aging", Int J Comput Dent, 20, pp.53~64 (2017)
- Att W, "Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: an in vitro study", J Prosthet Dent, 95, pp.111~116 (2006)[DOI]
- Coelho PG, "Fatigue testing of two porcelain-zirconia allceramic crown systems", Dent Mater, 25, pp.1122~1127 (2009)[DOI]
- Gibbs CH, "Chewing movements in relation to border movements at the first molar", J Prosthet Dent, 46, pp.308~322 (1981)[DOI]
- Strub JR, "Fracture strength and failure mode of five different single-tooth implant-abutment combinations", Int J Prosthodont, 16, pp.167~171 (2003)
- Ouzer A, "The evolution and fabrication of implant-supported full-arch hybrid prostheses. From conventional casted metal to an all-ceramic zirconia", NY State Dent J, 81, pp.44~49 (2015)
- Kern M, "Wear of composite resin veneering materials in a dual-axis chewing simulator", J Oral Rehabil, 26, pp.372~378 (1999)[DOI]
- Kelly JR, "Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of allceramic restorations", J Prosthet Dent, 81, pp.652~661 (1999)[DOI]
- Kobayashi, "Phase change and mechanical properties of ZrO2-Y2O3 solid electrolyte after ageing.", Solid State Ionics, 3, pp.489~495 (1981)
- Beuer F, "High-strength CAD", CAM-fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings-a new fabrication mode for all-ceramic restorations, 2009, pp.25, 121~128
- Lughi V, "Low temperature degradation -aging- of zirconia: A critical review of the relevant aspects in dentistry", Dent Mater, 26, pp.807~820 (2010)[DOI]
- Chai J, "Probability of failure of machined zirconia dental ceramic core materials", Int J Prosthodont, 22, pp.340~341 (2009)
- Denry I, "State of the art of zirconia for dental applications", Dent Mater, 24, pp.299~307 (2008)[DOI]
- Zhang Y, "Fractureresistant monolithic dental crowns", Dent Mater, 32, pp.442~449 (2016)[DOI]
- de Kok P, "Mechanical performance of implant-supported posterior crowns", J Prosthet Dent, 114, pp.59~66 (2015)[DOI]
- Zesewitz TF, "Fracture resistance of a selection of full-contour all-ceramic crowns: an in vitro study", Int J Prosthodont, 27, pp.264~266 (2014)[DOI]
- Kelly JR, "Dental ceramics: current thinking and trends", Dent Clin North Am, 48, pp.513~530 (2004)[DOI]
- Ritter JE, "Predicting lifetimes of materials and material structures", Dent Mater, 11, pp.142~146 (1995)[DOI]
- Yildirim M, "In vivo fracture resistance of implant-supported all-ceramic restorations", J Prosthet Dent, 90, pp.325~331 (2003)[DOI]
- Sailer I, "A systematic review of the performance of ceramic and metal implant abutments supporting fixed implant reconstructions", Clin Oral Implants Res, 20, pp.4~31 (2009)[DOI]
- Rosentritt M, "In vitro performance and fracture resistance of CAD", CAMfabricated implant supported molar crowns, 2017, pp.21, 1213~1219
- Taskonak B, "Two-year clinical evaluation of lithiadisilicate- based all-ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures", Dent Mater, 22, pp.1008~1013 (2006)[DOI]
- Gehrt M, "Clinical results of lithium-disilicate crowns after up to 9 years of service", Clin Oral Investig, 17, pp.275~284 (2013)[DOI]
- Zhao K, "Influence of veneer and cyclic loading on failure behavior of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic molar crowns", Dent Mater, 30, pp.164~171 (2014)[DOI]
- Silva NR, "Reliability of reduced-thickness and thinly veneered lithium disilicate crowns", J Dent Res, 91, pp.305~310 (2012)[DOI]
- Kelly JR, "Development of a clinically validated bulk failure test for ceramic crowns", J Prosthet Dent, 104, pp.228~238 (2010)[DOI]
- Patzelt SB, "CAD", CAM-fabricated implant-supported restorations: a systematic review, 2015, pp.26, 77~85
- Heintze SD, "Influence of the antagonist material on the wear of different composites using two different wear simulation methods", Dent Mater, 22, pp.166~175 (2006)[DOI]
- Zhang Y, "Fatigue of dental ceramics", J Dent, 41, pp.1135~1147 (2013)[DOI]
