Accuracy of provisional crowns made using stereolithography apparatus and subtractive technique
2
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. To compare and analyze trueness and precision of provisional crowns made using stereolithography apparatus and subtractive technology. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Digital impressions were made using a master model and an intraoral scanner and the crowns were designed with CAD software; in total, 22 crowns were produced. After superimposing CAD design data and scan data using a 3D program, quantitative and qualitative data were obtained for analysis of trueness and precision. Statistical analysis was performed using normality test combined with Levene test for equal variance analysis and independent sample t-test. Type 1 error was set at 0.05. RESULTS. Trueness for the outer and inner surfaces of the SLA crown (SLAC) were 49.6±9.3 μm and 22.5±5.1 μm, respectively, and those of the subtractive crown (SUBC) were 31.8±7.5 μm and 14.6±1.2 μm, respectively. Precision values for the outer and inner surfaces of the SLAC were 18.7±6.2 μm and 26.9±8.5 μm, and those of the SUBC were 25.4±3.1 μm and 13.8±0.6 μm, respectively. Trueness values for the outer and inner surfaces of the SLAC and SUBC showed statistically significant differences (P<.001). Precision for the inner surface showed significance (P<.03), whereas that for the outer surface showed no significance (P<.58). CONCLUSION. The study demonstrates that provisional crowns produced by subtractive technology are superior to crowns fabricated by stereolithography in terms of accuracy.
Abstract
PURPOSE. To compare and analyze trueness and precision of provisional crowns made using stereolithography apparatus and subtractive technology. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Digital impressions were made using a master model and an intraoral scanner and the crowns were designed with CAD software; in total, 22 crowns were produced. After superimposing CAD design data and scan data using a 3D program, quantitative and qualitative data were obtained for analysis of trueness and precision. Statistical analysis was performed using normality test combined with Levene test for equal variance analysis and independent sample t-test. Type 1 error was set at 0.05. RESULTS. Trueness for the outer and inner surfaces of the SLA crown (SLAC) were 49.6±9.3 μm and 22.5±5.1 μm, respectively, and those of the subtractive crown (SUBC) were 31.8±7.5 μm and 14.6±1.2 μm, respectively. Precision values for the outer and inner surfaces of the SLAC were 18.7±6.2 μm and 26.9±8.5 μm, and those of the SUBC were 25.4±3.1 μm and 13.8±0.6 μm, respectively. Trueness values for the outer and inner surfaces of the SLAC and SUBC showed statistically significant differences (P<.001). Precision for the inner surface showed significance (P<.03), whereas that for the outer surface showed no significance (P<.58). CONCLUSION. The study demonstrates that provisional crowns produced by subtractive technology are superior to crowns fabricated by stereolithography in terms of accuracy.
참고문헌 (22)
- Nejatidanesh F, "Marginal accuracy of interim restorations fabricated from four interim autopolymerizing resins", J Prosthet Dent, 95, pp.364~367 (2006)[DOI]
- Isil Karaokutan, "In vitro study of fracture strength of provisional crown materials", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 7(1), pp.27~31 (2015), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Ferracane J, "Elution of leachable components from composites", J Oral Rehabil, 21, pp.441~452 (1994)[DOI]
- Young HM, "Comparative in vitro evaluation of two provisional restorative materials", J Prosthet Dent, 85, pp.129~132 (2001)[DOI]
- Poticny DJ, "CAD", CAM in-office technology: Innovations after 25 years for predictable, esthetic outcomes, 2010, pp.141, 5~9
- Ng J, "A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods", J Prosthet Dent, 112, pp.555~560 (2014)[DOI]
- Kim CM, "Trueness of milled prostheses according to number of ball-end mill burs", J Prosthet Dent, 115, pp.624~629 (2016)[DOI]
- 김동연, "Evaluation of marginal and internal gaps in single and three-unit metal frameworks made by micro-stereolithography", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 9(4), pp.239~243 (2017), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Van Noort R, "The future of dental devices is digital", Dent Mater, 28, pp.3~12 (2012)[DOI]
- Braian M, "Production tolerance of additive manufactured polymeric objects for clinical applications", Dent Mater, 32, pp.853~861 (2016)[DOI]
- Koch GK, "Accuracy in the digital workflow: From data acquisition to the digitally milled cast", J Prosthet Dent, 115, pp.749~754 (2016)[DOI]
- "ISO-12836, Digitizing devices for CAD", CAM systems for indirect dental restorations - Test methods for assessing accuracy, 2012
- "ISO-5725-1, Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results. Part 1: General principles and definitions", International Standards for Organization (ISO), ~ (1994)
- Kirsch C, "Trueness of four different milling procedures used in dental CAD", CAM systems, 2017, pp.21, 551~558
- Bosch G, "A 3-dimensional accuracy analysis of chairside CAD", CAM milling processes, 2014, pp.112, 1425~1431
- Schaefer O, "Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate partial crowns in vitro: A three-dimensional analysis of accuracy and reproducibility", Dent Mater, 28, pp.320~326 (2012)[DOI]
- 정일도, "Ceramic molar crown reproducibility by digital workflow manufacturing: An in vitro study", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 9(4), pp.252~256 (2017), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- 이완선, "Evaluation of internal fit of interim crown fabricated with CAD", CAM milling and 3D printing system, 2017, pp.9(4), 265~270[DOI]
- Kim KB, "In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of three-unit fixed dental prostheses produced by stereolithography", Dent Mater J, 33, pp.504~509 (2014)[DOI]
- 박진영, "Evaluation of the marginal and internal gaps of three different dental prostheses: comparison of the silicone replica technique and three-dimensional superimposition analysis", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 9(3), pp.159~169 (2017), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Al-Imam, Hiba, "Accuracy of stereolithography additive casts used in a digital workflow", J Prosthet Dent, 119, pp.580~585 (2018)[DOI]
- Kim DY, "Reproducibility of different arrangement of resin copings by dental microstereolithography: Evaluating the marginal discrepancy of resin copings", J Prosthet Dent, 117, pp.260~265 (2017)[DOI]