Effects of different surface finishing protocols for zirconia on surface roughness and bacterial biofilm formation
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. Surface finishing of a zirconia restoration is essential after clinical adjustment. Herein, we investigated the effects of a surface finishing protocol for monolithic zirconia on final roughness and bacterial adherence. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Forty-eight disk-shaped monolithic zirconia specimens were fabricated and divided into four groups (n = 12) based on initial surface treatment, finishing, and polishing protocols: diamond bur+polishing bur (DP group), diamond bur+stone grinding bur+polishing bur (DSP group), no diamond bur+polishing bur (NP group), and no diamond bur+stone grinding bur+polishing bur (NSP group). Initial and final surface roughness was measured with a profilometer, and shown using scanning electron microscope. Bacterial adhesion was evaluated by quantifying Streptococcus mutans in the biofilm. Kruskal–Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare results among groups, and two-way analysis of variance was used to evaluate the effects of grinding burs on final roughness (α=.05). RESULTS. The DP group had the highest final Ra value, followed by the DSP, NP, and NSP groups. Use of the stone grinding bur as a coarsefinishing step significantly decreased final Ra values when a diamond bur was used (P<.001). Omission of the stone grinding bur increased biofilm formation on specimen surfaces. Combining a stone grinding bur with silicone polishing burs produced the smallest final biofilm values, regardless of the use of a diamond bur in initial surface treatment. CONCLUSION. Coarse finishing of monolithic zirconia with a stone grinding bur significantly decreased final Ra values and bacterial biofilm formation when surfaces had been roughened by a diamond bur. [ J Adv Prosthodont 2019;11:41-7]
Abstract
PURPOSE. Surface finishing of a zirconia restoration is essential after clinical adjustment. Herein, we investigated the effects of a surface finishing protocol for monolithic zirconia on final roughness and bacterial adherence. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Forty-eight disk-shaped monolithic zirconia specimens were fabricated and divided into four groups (n = 12) based on initial surface treatment, finishing, and polishing protocols: diamond bur+polishing bur (DP group), diamond bur+stone grinding bur+polishing bur (DSP group), no diamond bur+polishing bur (NP group), and no diamond bur+stone grinding bur+polishing bur (NSP group). Initial and final surface roughness was measured with a profilometer, and shown using scanning electron microscope. Bacterial adhesion was evaluated by quantifying Streptococcus mutans in the biofilm. Kruskal–Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare results among groups, and two-way analysis of variance was used to evaluate the effects of grinding burs on final roughness (α=.05). RESULTS. The DP group had the highest final Ra value, followed by the DSP, NP, and NSP groups. Use of the stone grinding bur as a coarsefinishing step significantly decreased final Ra values when a diamond bur was used (P<.001). Omission of the stone grinding bur increased biofilm formation on specimen surfaces. Combining a stone grinding bur with silicone polishing burs produced the smallest final biofilm values, regardless of the use of a diamond bur in initial surface treatment. CONCLUSION. Coarse finishing of monolithic zirconia with a stone grinding bur significantly decreased final Ra values and bacterial biofilm formation when surfaces had been roughened by a diamond bur. [ J Adv Prosthodont 2019;11:41-7]
참고문헌 (21)
- Ipek Caglar, "The effect of various polishing systems on surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 10(2), pp.132~137 (2018), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Chavali R, "Evaluation of different polishing systems and speeds for dental zirconia", J Prosthodont, 26, pp.410~418 (2017)
- Kim HK, "Effects of surface treatments on the translucency, opalescence, and surface texture of dental monolithic zirconia ceramics", J Prosthet Dent, 115, pp.773~779 (2016)
- Kim MJ, "Wear evaluation of the human enamel opposing different Y-TZP dental ceramics and other porcelains", J Dent, 40, pp.979~988 (2012)
- Teughels W, "Effect of material characteristics and", or surface topography on biofilm development, 2006, pp.17, 68~81
- Jones CS, "The in vivo perception of roughness of restorations", Br Dent J, 196, pp.42~45 (2004)
- Yuzugullu B, "The effect of different polishing sequences on the adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to feldspathic Porcelain", J Adhes, 92, pp.939~949 (2016)
- Bollen CM, "Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention : a review of the literature", Dent Mater, 13, pp.258~269 (1997)
- 이병철, "Initial bacterial adhesion on resin, titanium and zirconia in vitro", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 3(2), pp.81~84 (2011), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Miyazaki T, "Current status of zirconia restoration", J Prosthodont Res, 57, pp.236~261 (2013)
- Huh YH, "Evaluation of various polishing systems and the phase transformation of monolithic zirconia", J Prosthet Dent, 116, pp.440~449 (2016)
- Preis V, "The effectiveness of polishing kits : influence on surface roughness of zirconia", Int J Prosthodont, 28, pp.149~151 (2015)
- Ho CM, "The effects of dry and wet grinding on the strength of dental zirconia", Ceram Int, 44, pp.10451~10462 (2018)
- Kosmac T, "Strength and reliability of surface treated Y-TZP dental ceramics", J Biomed Mater Res, 53, pp.304~313 (2000)
- Kosmac T, "The effect of surface grinding and sandblasting on flexural strength and reliability of Y-TZP zirconia ceramic", Dent Mater, 15, pp.426~433 (1999)
- Kyung-Rok Lee, "Effect of different grinding burs on the physical properties of zirconia", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 8(2), pp.137~143 (2016), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Gilan I, "Extracellular DNA plays an important structural role in the biofilm of the plastic degrading actinomycete Rhodo-coccus ruber", Adv Microbiol, 3, pp.543~551 (2013)
- O’Toole GA, "Microtiter dish biofilm formation assay", J Vis Exp, 47, pp.2437~ (2011)
- Han A, "Influence of grit-Blasting and hydrofluoric acid etching treatment on surface characteristics and biofilm formation on zirconia", Coatings, 7, pp.130~ (2017)
- 김희경, "Comparison of the optical properties of pre-colored dental monolithic zirconia ceramics sintered in a conventional furnace versus a microwave oven", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 9(5), pp.394~401 (2017), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Goo CL, "Effect of polishing systems on surface roughness and topography of monolithic zirconia", Oper Dent, 41, pp.417~423 (2016)