Effects of different finishing/polishing protocols and systems for monolithic zirconia on surface topography, phase transformation, and biofilm formation
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of various protocols and systems for finishing and polishing monolithic zirconia on surface topography, phase transformation, and bacterial adhesion. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three hundred monolithic zirconia specimens were fabricated and then treated with three finishing and polishing systems (Jota [JO], Meisinger [ME], and Edenta [ED]) using four surface treatment protocols: coarse finishing alone (C); coarse finishing and medium polishing (CM); coarse finishing and fine polishing (CF); and coarse finishing, medium polishing, and fine polishing (CMF). Surface roughness, crystal phase transformation, and bacterial adhesion were evaluated using atomic force microscopy, X-ray diffraction, and streptococcal biofilm formation assay, respectively. One-way and two-way analysis of variance with Tukey post hoc tests were used to analyze the results (α=.05). RESULTS. In this study, the surface treatment protocols and systems had significant effects on the resulting roughness. The CMF protocol produced the lowest roughness values, followed by CM and CF. Use of the JO system produced the lowest roughness values and the smallest biofilm mass, while the ME system produced the smallest partial transformation ratio. The ED group exhibited the highest roughness values, biofilm mass, and partial transformation ratio. CONCLUSION. Stepwise surface treatment of monolithic zirconia, combined with careful polishing system selection, is essential to obtaining optimal microstructural and biological surface results.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of various protocols and systems for finishing and polishing monolithic zirconia on surface topography, phase transformation, and bacterial adhesion. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three hundred monolithic zirconia specimens were fabricated and then treated with three finishing and polishing systems (Jota [JO], Meisinger [ME], and Edenta [ED]) using four surface treatment protocols: coarse finishing alone (C); coarse finishing and medium polishing (CM); coarse finishing and fine polishing (CF); and coarse finishing, medium polishing, and fine polishing (CMF). Surface roughness, crystal phase transformation, and bacterial adhesion were evaluated using atomic force microscopy, X-ray diffraction, and streptococcal biofilm formation assay, respectively. One-way and two-way analysis of variance with Tukey post hoc tests were used to analyze the results (α=.05). RESULTS. In this study, the surface treatment protocols and systems had significant effects on the resulting roughness. The CMF protocol produced the lowest roughness values, followed by CM and CF. Use of the JO system produced the lowest roughness values and the smallest biofilm mass, while the ME system produced the smallest partial transformation ratio. The ED group exhibited the highest roughness values, biofilm mass, and partial transformation ratio. CONCLUSION. Stepwise surface treatment of monolithic zirconia, combined with careful polishing system selection, is essential to obtaining optimal microstructural and biological surface results.
참고문헌 (34)
- Miyazaki T, "Current status of zirconia restoration", J Prosthodont Res, 57, pp.236~261 (2013)
- Kelly JR, "Stabilized zirconia as a structural ceramic : an overview", Dent Mater, 24, pp.289~298 (2008)
- Guazzato M, "Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of allceramic materials. Part II. Zirconia-based dental ceramics", Dent Mater, 20, pp.449~456 (2004)
- Hmaidouch R, "Surface roughness of zirconia for full-contour crowns after clinically simulated grinding and polishing", Int J Oral Sci, 6, pp.241~246 (2014)
- Khayat W, "Effect of grinding and polishing on roughness and strength of zirconia", J Prosthet Dent, 119, pp.626~631 (2018)
- Alao AR, "Surface quality of yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal in CAD", CAM milling, sintering, polishing and sandblasting processes, 2017, pp.65, 102~116
- Kim MJ, "Wear evaluation of the human enamel opposing different Y-TZP dental ceramics and other porcelains", J Dent, 40, pp.979~988 (2012)
- Teughels W, "Effect of material characteristics and", or surface topography on biofilm development, 2006, pp.17, 68~81
- Omer Sagsoz, "The effects of different polishing techniques on the staining resistance of CAD", CAM resin-ceramics, 2016, pp.8(6), 417~422[DOI]
- Amer R, "Effect of simulated mastication on the surface roughness of three ceramic systems", J Prosthet Dent, 114, pp.260~265 (2015)
- Etman MK, "Quantitative measurement of tooth and ceramic wear : in vivo study", Int J Prosthodont, 21, pp.245~252 (2008)
- Mohammadi-Bassir M, "Effect of coarse grinding, overglazing, and 2 polishing systems on the flexural strength, surface roughness, and phase transformation of yttrium-stabilized tetragonal zirconia", J Prosthet Dent, 118, pp.658~665 (2017)
- Jones CS, "The in vivo perception of roughness of restorations", Br Dent J, 196, pp.42~45 (2004)
- Preis V, "The effectiveness of polishing kits : influence on surface roughness of zirconia", Int J Prosthodont, 28, pp.149~151 (2015)
- Ipek Caglar, "The effect of various polishing systems on surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 10(2), pp.132~137 (2018), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Jefferies SR, "Abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry : a state-of-the-art review", Dent Clin North Am, 51, pp.379~397 (2007)
- Al-Haj Husain N, "A study on topographical properties and surface wettability of monolithic zirconia after use of diverse polishing instruments with different surface coatings", Prosthodont, 27, pp.429~442 (2018)
- Huh YH, "Evaluation of various polishing systems and the phase transformation of monolithic zirconia", J Prosthet Dent, 116, pp.440~449 (2016)
- Kobayashi K, "Phase change and mechanical properties of ZrO2-Y2O3 solid electrolyte after ageing", Solid State Ion, 3-4, pp.489~493 (1980)
- Gibson IR, "Qualitative X-ray diffraction analysis of metastable tetragonal(t′)zirconia", J Am Ceram Soc, 84, pp.615~618 (2001)
- Albakry M, "Effect of sandblasting, grinding, polishing and glazing on the flexural strength of two pressable all-ceramic dental materials", J Dent, 32, pp.91~99 (2004)
- Luthardt RG, "Reliability and properties of ground Y-TZP-zirconia ceramics", J Dent Res, 81, pp.487~491 (2002)
- Toraya H, "Calibration curve for quantitative analysis of the monoclinic-tetragonal ZrO2 system by X-ray diffraction", J Am Ceram Soc, 67, pp.C119~C121 (1984)
- Garvie RC, "Phase analysis in zirconia systems", J Am Ceram Soc, 55, pp.303~305 (1972)
- Gilan I, "Extracellular DNA plays an important structural role in the biofilm of the plastic degrading actinomycete Rhodo-coccus ruber", Adv Microbiol, 3, pp.543~551 (2013)
- Silva TM, "Polishing for glass ceramics : which protocol", J Prosthodont Res, 58, pp.160~170 (2014)
- Jing Z, "Effect of multistep processing technique on the formation of micro-defects and residual stresses in zirconia dental restorations", J Prosthodont, 23, pp.206~212 (2014)
- Erdemir U, "The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of novel resin composites", Eur J Dent, 6, pp.198~205 (2012)
- Lanson B, "Decomposition of X-ray diffraction patterns : a convenient way to describe complex I", S diagenetic evolution, 1992, pp.40, 629~643
- Park C, "Effect of various polishing systems on the surface roughness and phase transformation of zirconia and the durability of the polishing systems", J Prosthet Dent, 117, pp.430~437 (2017)
- 이병철, "Initial bacterial adhesion on resin, titanium and zirconia in vitro", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 3(2), pp.81~84 (2011), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Bollen CM, "Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention : a review of the literature", Dent Mater, 13, pp.258~269 (1997)
- 김희경, "Comparison of the optical properties of pre-colored dental monolithic zirconia ceramics sintered in a conventional furnace versus a microwave oven", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 9(5), pp.394~401 (2017), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- 최재원, "In vitro study of the fracture resistance of monolithic lithium disilicate, monolithic zirconia, and lithium disilicate pressed on zirconia for three-unit fixed dental prostheses", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 9(4), pp.244~251 (2017), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
