Strain of implants depending on occlusion types in mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses
3
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. This study investigated the strain of implants using a chewing simulator with strain gauges in mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses under various dynamic loads. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three implant-supported 5-unit fixed prostheses were fabricated with three different occlusion types (Group I: Canine protected occlusion, Group II: Unilaterally balanced occlusion, Group III: Bilaterally balanced occlusion). Two strain gauges were attached to each implant abutment. The programmed dynamic loads (0 - 300 N) were applied using a chewing simulator (MTS 858 Mini Bionix II systems, MTS systems corp., Minn, USA) and the strains were monitored. The statistical analyses were performed using the paired t-test and the ANOVA. RESULTS. The mean strain values (MSV) for the working sides were 151.83 με, 176.23 με, and 131.07 μεfor Group I, Group II, and Group III, respectively. There was a significant difference between Group II and Group III (P < .05). Also, the MSV for non-working side were 58.29 με, 72.64 με, and 98.93 μεfor Group I, Group II, and Group III, respectively. One was significantly different from the others with a 95% confidence interval (P < .05). CONCLUSION. The MSV for the working side of Groups I and II were significantly different from that for the non-working side (Group I: t = 7.58, Group II: t = 6.25). The MSV for the working side of Group II showed significantly larger than that of Group III (P < .01). Lastly, the MSV for the non-working side of Group III showed significantly larger than those of Group I or Group II (P < .01).
Abstract
PURPOSE. This study investigated the strain of implants using a chewing simulator with strain gauges in mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses under various dynamic loads. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three implant-supported 5-unit fixed prostheses were fabricated with three different occlusion types (Group I: Canine protected occlusion, Group II: Unilaterally balanced occlusion, Group III: Bilaterally balanced occlusion). Two strain gauges were attached to each implant abutment. The programmed dynamic loads (0 - 300 N) were applied using a chewing simulator (MTS 858 Mini Bionix II systems, MTS systems corp., Minn, USA) and the strains were monitored. The statistical analyses were performed using the paired t-test and the ANOVA. RESULTS. The mean strain values (MSV) for the working sides were 151.83 με, 176.23 με, and 131.07 μεfor Group I, Group II, and Group III, respectively. There was a significant difference between Group II and Group III (P < .05). Also, the MSV for non-working side were 58.29 με, 72.64 με, and 98.93 μεfor Group I, Group II, and Group III, respectively. One was significantly different from the others with a 95% confidence interval (P < .05). CONCLUSION. The MSV for the working side of Groups I and II were significantly different from that for the non-working side (Group I: t = 7.58, Group II: t = 6.25). The MSV for the working side of Group II showed significantly larger than that of Group III (P < .01). Lastly, the MSV for the non-working side of Group III showed significantly larger than those of Group I or Group II (P < .01).
참고문헌 (42)
- Adell R, "Longterm follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 5, pp.347~359 (1990)
- Branemark PI, "Tissue Integrated. Prostheses: In: osseointegration in clinical dentistry", pp.176~186 (1985), Quintessence
- Adell R, "A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw", Int J Oral Surg, 10, pp.387~416 (1981)
- Esposito M, "Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (II). Etiopathogenesis", Eur J Oral Sci, 106, pp.721~764 (1998)
- Kohavi D, "Complications in the tissue integrated prostheses components: clinical and mechanical evaluation", J Oral Rehabil, 20, pp.413~422 (1993)
- Taylor TD, "Implant prosthodontics: current perspective and future directions", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, pp.66~75 (2000)
- Chapman RJ, "Principles of occlusion for implant prostheses: guidelines for position, timing, and force of occlusal contacts", Quintessence Int, 20, pp.473~480 (1989)
- Ashman RB, "The elastic properties of a human mandible", Adv Dent Res, 1, pp.64~67 (1987)
- Geng JP, "Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature", J Prosthet Dent, 85, pp.585~598 (2001)
- Gibbs CH, "Occlusal forces during chewing and swallowing as measured by sound transmission", J Prosthet Dent, 46, pp.443~449 (1981)
- Bidez MW, "Force transfer in implant dentistry: basic concepts and principles", J Oral Implantol, 18, pp.264~274 (1992)
- Stanford CM, "Toward an understanding of implant occlusion and strain adaptive bone modeling and remodeling", J Prosthet Dent, 81, pp.553~561 (1999)
- Roberts WE, "Fundamental principles of bone physiology, metabolism and loading in: Osseointegration in oral rehabilitation: an introductory textbook", pp.163~164 (1993), Quintessence
- Duyck J, "The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants: an animal experimental study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 12, pp.207~218 (2001)
- Quirynen M, "Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Branemark system", Clin Oral Implants Res, 3, pp.104~111 (1992)
- Horshaw SJ, "Mechanical loading of Branemark implants affects interfacial bone modelling and remodelling", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 9, pp.345~360 (1994)
- Frost HM, "Wolff's Law and bone's structural adaptations to mechanical usage: an overview for clinicians", Angle Orthod, 64, pp.175~188 (1994)
- Pilliar RM, "Dental implant design-effect on bone remodeling", J Biomed Mater Res, 25, pp.467~483 (1991)
- Buser D, "Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 13, pp.611~619 (1998)
- Hebel KS, "Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry", J Prosthet Dent, 77, pp.28~35 (1997)
- Mericske-Stern R, "In vivo force measurements on maxillary implants supporting a fixed prosthesis or an overdenture: a pilot study", J Prosthet Dent, 84, pp.535~547 (2000)
- Bergendal T, "Implant-supported overdentures: a longitudinal prospective study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 13, pp.253~262 (1998)
- Lekholm U, "Survival of the Branemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: a 10-year prospective multicenter study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 14, pp.639~645 (1999)
- Skalak R, "Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses", J Prosthet Dent, 49, pp.843~848 (1983)
- Davis DM, "Studies on frameworks for osseointegrated prostheses: Part 2. The effect of adding acrylic resin or porcelain to form the occlusal superstructure", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 3, pp.275~280 (1988)
- Gracis SE, "Shock absorbing behavior of five restorative materials used on implants", Int J Prosthodont, 4, pp.282~291 (1991)
- Cibirka RM, "Determining the force absorption quotient for restorative materials used in implant occlusal surfaces", J Prosthet Dent, 67, pp.361~364 (1992)
- Hobkirk JA, "The influence of occlusal surface material on peak masticatory forces using osseointegrated implant-supported prostheses", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 7, pp.345~352 (1992)
- Sertgo¨z A, "Finite element analysis study of the effect of superstructure material on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis", Int J Prosthodont, 10, pp.19~27 (1997)
- Brunski JB, "Biomaterials and biomechanics of oral and maxillofacial implants: current status and future developments", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, pp.15~46 (2000)
- Glantz PO, "On clinical loading of osseointegrated implants. A methodological and clinical study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 4, pp.99~105 (1993)
- Smedberg JI, "On the influence of superstructure connection on implant preload: a methodological and clinical study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 7, pp.55~63 (1996)
- Keaveny TM, "Trabecular bone exhibits fully linear elastic behavior and yields at low strains", J Biomech, 27, pp.1127~1136 (1994)
- Heckmann SM, "Cement fixation and screw retention: parameters of passive fit. An in vitro study of three-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures", Clin Oral Implants Res, 15, pp.466~473 (2004)
- Karl M, "In vitro study on passive fit in implant-supported 5-unit fixed partial dentures", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 19, pp.30~37 (2004)
- Curtis DA, "Incidence of various classes of removable partial dentures", J Prosthet Dent, 67, pp.664~667 (1992)
- Helkimo E, "Bite force and state of dentition", Acta Odontol Scand, 35, pp.297~303 (1977)
- van Eijden TM, "Three-dimensional analyses of human bite-force magnitude and moment", Arch Oral Biol, 36, pp.535~539 (1991)
- Gibbs CH, "Limits of human bite strength", J Prosthet Dent, 56, pp.226~229 (1986)
- Haraldson T, "Bite force and oral function in complete denture wearers", J Oral Rehabil, 6, pp.41~48 (1979)
- Haraldson T, "Functional state, bite force and postural muscle activity in patients with osseointegrated oral implant bridges", Acta Odontol Scand, 37, pp.195~206 (1979)
- Mericske-Stern R, "In vivo measurements of some functional aspects with mandibular fixed prostheses supported by implants", Clin Oral Implants Res, 7, pp.153~161 (1996)
