The effect of different adhesive system applications on push-out bond strengths of glass fiber posts
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. Over the past years, the adhesion of fiber posts luted with simplified adhesive systems has been a matter of great interest. The aim of this study was to assess the post retentive potential of a self-adhesive resin cement using different adhesive systems to compare the push-out bond strengths of fiber posts. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The post spaces of 56 mandibular premolar roots were prepared and divided into 4 experimental groups and further divided into 2 subgroups according to testing time (n=7). The fiber posts (Rely X Fiber Post) were luted with a self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX Unicem) and one of the following adhesive systems: no adhesive, a total-etch adhesive resin (Single Bond), a two-step self-etch adhesive resin (Clearfil SE Bond) and a one-step self-etch adhesive resin (Clearfil S3 Bond). Each root was cut horizontally, and 1.5 mm thick six root segments were prepared. Push-out tests were performed after one week or three months (0.5 mm/min). Statistical analysis were performed with three-way ANOVA (α=.05). RESULTS. Cervical root segments showed higher bond strength values than middle segments. Adhesive application increased the bond strength. For one week group, the total-etch adhesive resin Single Bond showed higher bond strength than the self-adhesive resin cement RelyX Unicem applied without adhesive resin at middle region. For 3 months group, the two-step self-etch adhesive resin Clearfil SE Bond showed the highest bond strength for both regions. Regarding the time considered, Clearfil SE Bond 3 months group showed higher bond strength values than one week group. conclusıon. Using the adhesive resins in combination with the self-adhesive resin cement improves the bond strengths. The bond strength values of two-step self-etch adhesive resin Clearfil SE Bond improved as time passes.
Abstract
PURPOSE. Over the past years, the adhesion of fiber posts luted with simplified adhesive systems has been a matter of great interest. The aim of this study was to assess the post retentive potential of a self-adhesive resin cement using different adhesive systems to compare the push-out bond strengths of fiber posts. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The post spaces of 56 mandibular premolar roots were prepared and divided into 4 experimental groups and further divided into 2 subgroups according to testing time (n=7). The fiber posts (Rely X Fiber Post) were luted with a self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX Unicem) and one of the following adhesive systems: no adhesive, a total-etch adhesive resin (Single Bond), a two-step self-etch adhesive resin (Clearfil SE Bond) and a one-step self-etch adhesive resin (Clearfil S3 Bond). Each root was cut horizontally, and 1.5 mm thick six root segments were prepared. Push-out tests were performed after one week or three months (0.5 mm/min). Statistical analysis were performed with three-way ANOVA (α=.05). RESULTS. Cervical root segments showed higher bond strength values than middle segments. Adhesive application increased the bond strength. For one week group, the total-etch adhesive resin Single Bond showed higher bond strength than the self-adhesive resin cement RelyX Unicem applied without adhesive resin at middle region. For 3 months group, the two-step self-etch adhesive resin Clearfil SE Bond showed the highest bond strength for both regions. Regarding the time considered, Clearfil SE Bond 3 months group showed higher bond strength values than one week group. conclusıon. Using the adhesive resins in combination with the self-adhesive resin cement improves the bond strengths. The bond strength values of two-step self-etch adhesive resin Clearfil SE Bond improved as time passes.
참고문헌 (30)
- Mak YF, "Micro-tensile bond testing of resin cements to dentin and an indirect resin composite", Dent Mater, 18, pp.609~621 (2002)
- Mazzitelli C, "Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on self-adhesive cements bonding to dentin", Dent Mater, 24, pp.1156~1163 (2008)
- Bitter K, "Morphological and bond strength evaluation of different resin cements to root dentin", Eur J Oral Sci, 117, pp.326~333 (2009)
- Radovic I, "Self-adhesive resin cements: a literature review", J Adhes Dent, 10, pp.251~258 (2008)
- Bitter K, "Post-endodontic restorations with adhesively luted fiber-reinforced composite post systems: a review", Am J Dent, 20, pp.353~360 (2007)
- Sirimai S, "An in vitro study of the fracture resistance and the incidence ofvertical root fracture of pulpless teeth restored with six post-and-coresystems", J Prosthet Dent, 81, pp.262~269 (1999)
- Sadek FT, "Immediate and 24-hour evaluation of the interfacial strengths of fiber posts", J Endod, 32, pp.1174~1177 (2006)
- Zhang L, "Effect of post-space treatment on retention of fiber posts in different root regions using two self-etching systems", Eur J Oral Sci, 116, pp.280~286 (2008)
- Bouillaguet S, "Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin", Dent Mater, 19, pp.199~205 (2003)
- Goracci C, "The contribution of friction to the dislocation resistance of bonded fiber posts", J Endod, 31, pp.608~612 (2005)
- Sahafi A, "Effect of surface treatment of prefabricated posts on bonding of resin cement", Oper Dent, 29, pp.60~68 (2004)
- Teixeira CS, "Influence of endodontic sealers on the bond strength of carbon fiber posts", J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 84, pp.430~435 (2008)
- Perdigão J, "The effect of silane on the bond strengths of fiber posts", Dent Mater, 22, pp.752~758 (2006)
- Ohlmann B, "The effect of two luting agents, pretreatment of the post, and pretreatment of the canal dentin on the retention of fiber-reinforced composite posts", J Dent, 36, pp.87~92 (2008)
- Mallmann A, "Microtensile bond strength of light- and self-cured adhesive systems to intraradicular dentin using a translucent fiber post", Oper Dent, 30, pp.500~506 (2005)
- Akgungor G, "Influence of dentin bonding agents and polymerization modes on the bond strength between translucent fiber posts and three dentin regions within a post space", J Prosthet Dent, 95, pp.368~378 (2006)
- Ferrari M, "Bonding to root canal: structural characteristics of the substrate", Am J Dent, 13, pp.255~260 (2000)
- Serafino C, "Surface debris of canal walls after post space preparation in endodontically treated teeth: a scanning electron microscopic study", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 97, pp.381~387 (2004)
- de Munck J, "Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin", Dent Mater, 20, pp.963~971 (2004)
- Goracci C, "The adhesion between fiber posts and root canal walls: comparison between microtensile and push-out bond strength measurements", Eur J Oral Sci, 112, pp.353~361 (2004)
- Goracci C, "Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts to intraradicular dentin", Oper Dent, 30, pp.627~635 (2005)
- Tay FR, "The overwet phenomenon: a transmission electron microscopic study of surface moisture in the acid-conditioned, resin-dentin interface", Am J Dent, 9, pp.161~166 (1996)
- Foxton RM, "Bonding of photo and dual-cure adhesives to root canal dentin", Oper Dent, 28, pp.543~551 (2003)
- Giannini M, "Pashley DH. The influence of tubule density and area of solid dentin on bond strength of two adhesive systems to dentin", J Adhes Dent, 3, pp.315~324 (2001)
- de Munck J, "Effect of dentin location and long-term water storage on bonding effectiveness of dentin adhesives", Dent Mater J, 30, pp.7~13 (2011)
- Shirai K, "Effect of cavity configuration and aging on the bonding effectiveness of six adhesives to dentin", Dent Mater, 21, pp.110~124 (2005)
- Inoue S, "Hydrolytic stability of self-etch adhesives bonded to dentin", J Dent Res, 84, pp.1160~1164 (2005)
- Miguez PA, "One-year tensile bond strengths of two self-etching primers to bovine enamel", J Esthet Restor Dent, 16, pp.243~248 (2004)
- Boschian Pest L, "Adhesive post-endodontic restorations with fiber posts: push-out tests and SEM observations", Dent Mater, 18, pp.596~602 (2002)
- Sahafi A, "QGotfredsen K. Retention and failure morphology of prefabricated posts", Int J Prosthodont, 17, pp.307~312 (2004)