Effect of magnesium and calcium phosphate coatings on osteoblastic responses to the titanium surface
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface properties and in vitro bioactivity to osteoblasts of magnesium and magnesium-hydroxyapatite coated titanium. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Themagnesium (Mg) and magnesium-hydroxyapatite (Mg-HA) coatings on titanium (Ti) substrates were prepared by radio frequency (RF) and direct current (DC) magnetron sputtering.The samples were divided into non-coated smooth Ti (Ti-S group), Mg coatinggroup (Ti-Mg group), and Mg-HA coating group (Ti-MgHA group).The surface properties were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The surface roughness was evaluated by atomic force microscopy (AFM). Cell adhesion, cell proliferation and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity were evaluated using MC3T3-E1 cells. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis was performed. RESULTS. Cross-sectional SEM images showed that Mg and Mg-HA depositionson titanium substrates were performed successfully. The surface roughness appeared to be similaramong the three groups. Ti-MgHA and Ti-Mg group had improved cellular responses with regard to the proliferation, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, and bone-associated markers, such as bone sialoprotein (BSP) and osteocalcin (OCN) mRNA compared to those of Ti-S group. However, the differences between Ti-Mg group and Ti-MgHA group were not significant, in spite of the tendency of higher proliferation, ALP activity and BSP expression in Ti-MgHA group. CONCLUSION. Mg and Mg-HAcoatings could stimulate the differentiation into osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells, potentially contributing to rapid osseointegration.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface properties and in vitro bioactivity to osteoblasts of magnesium and magnesium-hydroxyapatite coated titanium. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Themagnesium (Mg) and magnesium-hydroxyapatite (Mg-HA) coatings on titanium (Ti) substrates were prepared by radio frequency (RF) and direct current (DC) magnetron sputtering.The samples were divided into non-coated smooth Ti (Ti-S group), Mg coatinggroup (Ti-Mg group), and Mg-HA coating group (Ti-MgHA group).The surface properties were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The surface roughness was evaluated by atomic force microscopy (AFM). Cell adhesion, cell proliferation and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity were evaluated using MC3T3-E1 cells. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis was performed. RESULTS. Cross-sectional SEM images showed that Mg and Mg-HA depositionson titanium substrates were performed successfully. The surface roughness appeared to be similaramong the three groups. Ti-MgHA and Ti-Mg group had improved cellular responses with regard to the proliferation, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, and bone-associated markers, such as bone sialoprotein (BSP) and osteocalcin (OCN) mRNA compared to those of Ti-S group. However, the differences between Ti-Mg group and Ti-MgHA group were not significant, in spite of the tendency of higher proliferation, ALP activity and BSP expression in Ti-MgHA group. CONCLUSION. Mg and Mg-HAcoatings could stimulate the differentiation into osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells, potentially contributing to rapid osseointegration.
참고문헌 (15)
- Porter AE, "Bone bonding to hydroxyapatite and titanium surfaces on femoral stems retrieved from human subjects at autopsy", Biomaterials, 25, pp.5199~5208 (2004)
- Xu L, "In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the surface bioactivity of a calcium phosphate coated magnesium alloy", Biomaterials, 30, pp.1512~1523 (2009)
- Ibasco S, "Magnesium-sputtered titanium for the formation of bioactive coatings", Acta Biomater, 5, pp.2338~2347 (2009)
- Staiger MP, "Magnesium and its alloys as orthopedic biomaterials: a review", Biomaterials, 27, pp.1728~1734 (2006)
- Zreiqat H, "Mechanisms of magnesium-stimulated adhesion of osteoblastic cells to commonly used orthopaedic implants", J Biomed Mater Res, 62, pp.175~184 (2002)
- Lorenz C, "Effect of surface pre-treatments on biocompatibility of magnesium", Acta Biomater, 5, pp.2783~2789 (2009)
- 나영, "Implant surface treatments affect gene expression of Runx2, osteogenic key marker", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 1(2), pp.91~96 (2009), 대한치과보철학회
- Zreiqat H, "Surface modification of bioceramics affect osteoblastic cells response", Key Eng Mater, 240, pp.707~710 (2003)
- Sampaio BV, "Biocompatibility evaluation of three different titaniumhydroxyapatite composites", Key Engin Mater, 284, pp.639~642 (2005)
- Hashimoto Y, "Improvement of hydroxyapatite deposition on titanium dental implant using ArF laser ablation: effect on osteoblast biocompatibility in vitro", Adv Sci Technol, 49, pp.282~289 (2006)
- Hulshoff JE, "Evaluation of plasma-spray and magnetron-sputter Ca-P-coated implants: an in vivo experiment using rabbits", J Biomed Mater Res, 31, pp.329~337 (1996)
- Barrère F, "Osteogenecity of octacalcium phosphate coatings applied on porous metal implants", J Biomed Mater Res A, 66, pp.779~788 (2003)
- Lian JB, "The developmental stages of osteoblast growth and differentiation exhibit selective responses of genes to growth factors (TGF beta 1) and hormones", J Oral Implantol, 19, pp.95~105 (1993)
- El-Ghannam A, "Porous bioactive glass and hydroxyapatite ceramic affect bone cell function in vitro along different time lines", J Biomed Mater Res, 36, pp.167~180 (1997)
- Wan T, "RF-magnetron sputtering technique for producing hydroxyapatite coating film on various substrates", Biomed Mater Eng, 17, pp.291~297 (2007)