In vitro study of the fracture resistance of monolithic lithium disilicate, monolithic zirconia, and lithium disilicate pressed on zirconia for three-unit fixed dental prostheses
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to determine fracture resistance and failure modes of three-unit fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) made of lithium disilicate pressed on zirconia (LZ), monolithic lithium disilicate (ML), and monolithic zirconia (MZ). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Co-Cr alloy three-unit metal FDPs model with maxillary first premolar and first molar abutments was fabricated. Three different FDPs groups, LZ, ML, and MZ, were prepared (n = 5 per group). The three-unit FDPs designs were identical for all specimens and cemented with resin cement on the prepared metal model. The region of pontic in FDPs was given 50,000 times of cyclic preloading at 2 Hz via dental chewing simulator and received a static load until fracture with universal testing machine fixed at 10°. The fracture resistance and mode of failure were recorded. Statistical analyses were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni’s correction (α=0.05/3=0.017). RESULTS. A significant difference in fracture resistance was found between LZ (4943.87 ± 1243.70 N) and ML (2872.61 ± 658.78 N) groups, as well as between ML and MZ (4948.02 ± 974.51 N) groups (P<.05), but no significant difference was found between LZ and MZ groups (P>.05). With regard to fracture pattern, there were three cases of veneer chipping and two interfacial fractures in LZ group, and complete fracture was observed in all the specimens of ML and MZ groups. CONCLUSION. Compared to monolithic lithium disilicate FDPs, monolithic zirconia FDPs and lithium disilicate glass ceramics pressed on zirconia-based FDPs showed superior fracture resistance while they manifested comparable fracture resistances.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to determine fracture resistance and failure modes of three-unit fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) made of lithium disilicate pressed on zirconia (LZ), monolithic lithium disilicate (ML), and monolithic zirconia (MZ). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Co-Cr alloy three-unit metal FDPs model with maxillary first premolar and first molar abutments was fabricated. Three different FDPs groups, LZ, ML, and MZ, were prepared (n = 5 per group). The three-unit FDPs designs were identical for all specimens and cemented with resin cement on the prepared metal model. The region of pontic in FDPs was given 50,000 times of cyclic preloading at 2 Hz via dental chewing simulator and received a static load until fracture with universal testing machine fixed at 10°. The fracture resistance and mode of failure were recorded. Statistical analyses were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni’s correction (α=0.05/3=0.017). RESULTS. A significant difference in fracture resistance was found between LZ (4943.87 ± 1243.70 N) and ML (2872.61 ± 658.78 N) groups, as well as between ML and MZ (4948.02 ± 974.51 N) groups (P<.05), but no significant difference was found between LZ and MZ groups (P>.05). With regard to fracture pattern, there were three cases of veneer chipping and two interfacial fractures in LZ group, and complete fracture was observed in all the specimens of ML and MZ groups. CONCLUSION. Compared to monolithic lithium disilicate FDPs, monolithic zirconia FDPs and lithium disilicate glass ceramics pressed on zirconia-based FDPs showed superior fracture resistance while they manifested comparable fracture resistances.
참고문헌 (44)
- Lüthy H, "Strength and reliability of four-unit all-ceramic posterior bridges", Dent Mater, 21, pp.930~937 (2005)
- Datla SR, "Dental ceramics: Part II - Recent advances in dental ceramics", Am J Mater Eng Technol, 3, pp.19~26 (2015)
- Venclíkova Z, "Metallic pigmentation of human teeth and gingiva: morphological and immunological aspects", Dent Mater J, 26, pp.96~104 (2007)
- Donovan TE, "Factors essential for successful all-ceramic restorations", J Am Dent Assoc, 139, pp.14S~18S (2008)
- Sailer I, "Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures", Int J Prosthodont, 20, pp.383~388 (2007)
- Schultheis S, "Monolithic and bi-layer CAD", CAM lithium-disilicate versus metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses: comparison of fracture loads and failure modes after fatigue, 2013, pp.17, 1407~1413
- Rekow ED, "Performance of dental ceramics: challenges for improvements", J Dent Res, 90, pp.937~952 (2011)
- Kim HK, "Effect of the number of coloring liquid applications on the optical properties of monolithic zirconia", Dent Mater, 30, pp.e229~e237 (2014)
- Takeichi T, "Clinical outcome of single porcelain-fused-to-zirconium dioxide crowns: a systematic review", J Prosthet Dent, 110, pp.455~461 (2013)
- Sailer I, "Randomized controlled clinical trial of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses: a 3-year follow-up", Int J Prosthodont, 22, pp.553~560 (2009)
- Silva NR, "Modified Y-TZP core design improves all-ceramic crown reliability", J Dent Res, 90, pp.104~108 (2011)
- Baltzer A, "All-ceramic single-tooth restorations: choosing the material to match the preparation-preparing the tooth to match the material", Int J Comput Dent, 11, pp.241~256 (2008)
- Schmitter M, "Effect on in vitro fracture resistance of the technique used to attach lithium disilicate ceramic veneer to zirconia frameworks", Dent Mater, 30, pp.122~130 (2014)
- Kim SY, "Fracture strength after fatigue loading of lithium disilicate pressed zirconia crowns", Int J Prosthodont, 29, pp.369~371 (2016)
- Guess PC, "Effect of veneering techniques on damage and reliability of Y-TZP trilayers", Eur J Esthet Dent, 4, pp.262~276 (2009)
- Ambre MJ, "Fracture strength of yttria-stabilized zirconium-dioxide (Y-TZP) fixed dental prostheses (FPDs) with different abutment core thicknesses and connector dimensions", J Prosthodont, 22, pp.377~382 (2013)
- Wimmer T, "Influence of abutment model materials on the fracture loads of three-unit fixed dental prostheses", Dent Mater J, 33, pp.717~724 (2014)
- Nawafleh N, "Lithium disilicate restorations fatigue testing parameters: A systematic review", J Prosthodont, 25, pp.116~126 (2016)
- Kelly JR, "Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of allceramic restorations", J Prosthet Dent, 81, pp.652~661 (1999)
- Wiskott HW, "Stress fatigue: basic principles and prosthodontic implications", Int J Prosthodont, 8, pp.105~116 (1995)
- Zhang L, "Probabilistic fatigue analysis of all-ceramic crowns based on the finite element method", J Biomech, 43, pp.2321~2326 (2010)
- Beuer F, "Load-bearing capacity of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures with different computer-aided design (CAD)", computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) fabricated framework materials, 2008, pp.116, 381~386
- McLaren EA, "Zirconia-based ceramics:Material properties, esthetics, and layering techniques of a new veneering porcelain, VM9", Quintessence Dent Technol, 28, pp.99~112 (2005)
- Preis V, "Wear performance of monolithic dental ceramics with different surface treatments", Quintessence Int, 44, pp.393~405 (2013)
- DeLong R, "Intra-oral restorative materials wear: rethinking the current approaches: how to measure wear", Dent Mater, 22, pp.702~711 (2006)
- Woda A, "The regulation of masticatory function and food bolus formation", J Oral Rehabil, 33, pp.840~849 (2006)
- Rees JS, "An investigation into the importance of the periodontal ligament and alveolar bone as supporting structures in finite element studies", J Oral Rehabil, 28, pp.425~432 (2001)
- Cho L, "Marginal accuracy and fracture strength of ceromer", fiber-reinforced composite crowns:effect of variations in preparation design, 2002, pp.88, 388~395
- Rosentritt M, "Evaluation of tooth analogs and type of restoration on the fracture resistance of post and core restored incisors", Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 91, pp.272~276 (2009)
- Tinschert J, "Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate-, alumina-, and zirconia-based three-unit fixed partial dentures: a laboratory study", Int J Prosthodont, 14, pp.231~238 (2001)
- Scherrer SS, "The fracture resistance of all-ceramic crowns on supporting structures with different elastic moduli", Int J Prosthodont, 6, pp.462~467 (1993)
- Potiket N, "In vitro fracture strength of teeth restored with different all-ceramic crown systems", J Prosthet Dent, 92, pp.491~495 (2004)
- Bindl A, "Strength and fracture pattern of monolithic CAD", CAM-generated posterior crowns, 2006, pp.22, 29~36
- Rosentritt M, "Influence of stress simulation parameters on the fracture strength of allceramic fixed-partial dentures", Dent Mater, 22, pp.176~182 (2006)
- Sorensen JA, "IPS Empress crown system: three-year clinical trial results", J Calif Dent Assoc, 26, pp.130~136 (1998)
- Clausen JO, "Dynamic fatigue and fracture resistance of non-retentive all-ceramic full-coverage molar restorations. Influence of ceramic material and preparation design", Dent Mater, 26, pp.533~538 (2010)
- Della Bona A, "Fracture behavior of lithia disilicate- and leucite-based ceramics", Dent Mater, 20, pp.956~962 (2004)
- Apel E, "Phenomena and mechanisms of crack propagation in glass-ceramics", J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 1, pp.313~325 (2008)
- Rodríguez V, "Fracture load before and after veneering zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses", J Prosthodont, 25, pp.550~556 (2016)
- Garvie RC, "Ceramic Steel?", Nature, 258, pp.703~704 (1975)
- Luthardt RG, "Zirconia-TZP and alumina-advanced technologies for the manufacturing of single crowns", Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 7, pp.113~119 (1999)
- Weyhrauch M, "Fracture strength of monolithic all-ceramic crowns on titanium implant abutments", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 31, pp.304~309 (2016)
- Belli R, "Fracture rates and lifetime estimations of CAD", CAM allceramic restorations, 2016, pp.95, 67~73
- Guess PC, "Monolithic CAD", CAM lithium disilicate versus veneered Y-TZP crowns: comparison of failure modes and reliability after fatigue, 2010, pp.23, 434~442