본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Effect of different veneering techniques on the fracture strength of metal and zirconia frameworks

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

PURPOSE. To determine whether the fracture strengths and failure types differed between metal and zirconia frameworks veneered with pressable or layering ceramics. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A phantom molar tooth was prepared and duplicated in 40 cobalt-chromium abutments. Twenty metal (IPS d.SIGN 15, Ivoclar, Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) and 20 zirconia (IPS e.max ZirCAD, Ivoclar) frameworks were fabricated on the abutments. Each framework group was randomly divided into 2 subgroups according to the veneering material: pressable and layering ceramics (n=10). Forty molar crowns were fabricated, cemented onto the corresponding abutments and then thermocycled (5-55°C, 10,000 cycles). A load was applied in a universal testing machine until a fracture occurred on the crowns. In addition, failure types were examined using a stereomicroscope. Fracture load data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD post-hoc tests at a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS. The highest strength value was seen in metal-pressable (MP) group, whereas zirconia-pressable (ZP) group exhibited the lowest one. Moreover, group MP showed significantly higher fracture loads than group ZP (P=.015) and zirconia-layering (ZL) (P=.038) group. No significant difference in fracture strength was detected between groups MP and ML, and groups ZP and ZL (P>.05). Predominant fracture types were cohesive for metal groups and adhesive for zirconia groups. CONCLUSION. Fracture strength of a restoration with a metal or a zirconia framework was independent of the veneering techniques. However, the pressing technique over metal frameworks resisted significantly higher fracture loads than zirconia frameworks.

Abstract

PURPOSE. To determine whether the fracture strengths and failure types differed between metal and zirconia frameworks veneered with pressable or layering ceramics. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A phantom molar tooth was prepared and duplicated in 40 cobalt-chromium abutments. Twenty metal (IPS d.SIGN 15, Ivoclar, Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) and 20 zirconia (IPS e.max ZirCAD, Ivoclar) frameworks were fabricated on the abutments. Each framework group was randomly divided into 2 subgroups according to the veneering material: pressable and layering ceramics (n=10). Forty molar crowns were fabricated, cemented onto the corresponding abutments and then thermocycled (5-55°C, 10,000 cycles). A load was applied in a universal testing machine until a fracture occurred on the crowns. In addition, failure types were examined using a stereomicroscope. Fracture load data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD post-hoc tests at a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS. The highest strength value was seen in metal-pressable (MP) group, whereas zirconia-pressable (ZP) group exhibited the lowest one. Moreover, group MP showed significantly higher fracture loads than group ZP (P=.015) and zirconia-layering (ZL) (P=.038) group. No significant difference in fracture strength was detected between groups MP and ML, and groups ZP and ZL (P>.05). Predominant fracture types were cohesive for metal groups and adhesive for zirconia groups. CONCLUSION. Fracture strength of a restoration with a metal or a zirconia framework was independent of the veneering techniques. However, the pressing technique over metal frameworks resisted significantly higher fracture loads than zirconia frameworks.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. Guess PC, "Shear bond strengths between different zirconia cores and veneering ceramics and their susceptibility to thermocycling", Dent Mater, 24, pp.1556~1567 (2008)
  2. Akin GE, "Surface roughness and bond strength of zirconia posts to a resin cement after various surface pretreatments", Photomed Laser Surg, 33, pp.246~251 (2015)
  3. Akın H, "Shear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia ceramic after aluminum oxide sandblasting and various laser treatments", Photomed Laser Surg, 29, pp.797~802 (2011)
  4. Kirmali O, "Shear bond strength of veneering ceramic to zirconia core after different surface treatments", Photomed Laser Surg, 31, pp.261~268 (2013)
  5. Zhang Y, "Graded structures for damage resistant and aesthetic all-ceramic restorations", Dent Mater, 25, pp.781~790 (2009)
  6. Goracci C, "Current perspectives on post systems:a literature review", Aust Dent J, 56, pp.77~83 (2011)
  7. Macedo VC, "Effect of the layering technique on bond strength and cohesive resistance of a porcelain-zirconia system", J Adhes Dent, 16, pp.57~62 (2014)
  8. Ishibe M, "Shear bond strengths of pressed and layered veneering ceramics to high-noble alloy and zirconia cores", J Prosthet Dent, 106, pp.29~37 (2011)
  9. Choi JE, "Pressed ceramics onto zirconia. Part 1: Comparison of crystalline phases present, adhesion to a zirconia system and flexural strength", Dent Mater, 27, pp.1204~1212 (2011)
  10. Stawarczyk B, "Load-bearing capacity and failure types of anterior zirconia crowns veneered with overpressing and layering techniques", Dent Mater, 27, pp.1045~1053 (2011)
  11. Bonfante EA, "Fatigue and damage accumulation of veneer porcelain pressed on Y-TZP", J Dent, 38, pp.318~324 (2010)
  12. Aboushelib MN, "Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations", Dent Mater, 21, pp.984~991 (2005)
  13. Ritter JE, "Predicting lifetimes of materials and material structures", Dent Mater, 11, pp.142~146 (1995)
  14. Baldassarri M, "Reliability and failure modes of implant-supported zirconium-oxide fixed dental prostheses related to veneering techniques", J Dent, 39, pp.489~498 (2011)
  15. Beuer F, "High-strength CAD", CAM-fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings-a new fabrication mode for all-ceramic restorations, 2009, pp.25, 121~128
  16. Christensen RP, "A clinical comparison of zirconia, metal and alumina fixed-prosthesis frameworks veneered with layered or pressed ceramic: a three-year report", J Am Dent Assoc, 141, pp.1317~1329 (2010)
  17. Aboushelib MN, "Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part II: Zirconia veneering ceramics", Dent Mater, 22, pp.857~863 (2006)
  18. Eisenburger M, "Fracture stability of anterior zirconia crowns with different core designs and veneered using the layering or the press-over technique", Eur J Oral Sci, 119, pp.253~257 (2011)
  19. Kanat-Ertürk B, "Effect of veneering methods on zirconia framework-veneer ceramic adhesion and fracture resistance of single crowns", J Prosthodont (2014)
  20. 최유성, "In vitro evaluation of fracture strength of zirconia restoration veneered with various ceramic materials", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 4(3), pp.162~169 (2012), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
  21. Nakamura K, "Influence of grain size and veneer firing process on the flexural strength of zirconia ceramics", Eur J Oral Sci, 120, pp.249~254 (2012)
  22. Fahmy NZ, "An in vitro assessment of a ceramicpressed-to-metal system as an alternative to conventional metal ceramic systems", J Prosthodont, 20, pp.621~627 (2011)
  23. Schweitzer DM, "Comparison of bond strength of a pressed ceramic fused to metal versus feldspathic porcelain fused to metal", J Prosthodont, 14, pp.239~247 (2005)
  24. Ortorp A, "A 3-year retrospective and clinical follow-up study of zirconia single crowns performed in a private practice", J Dent, 37, pp.731~736 (2009)
  25. Näpänkangas R, "Twenty-year follow-up of metalceramic single crowns: a retrospective study", Int J Prosthodont, 21, pp.307~311 (2008)
  26. Oilo M, "Simulation of clinical fractures for three different all-ceramic crowns", Eur J Oral Sci, 122, pp.245~250 (2014)
  27. Attia A, "Influence of cyclic loading and luting agents on the fracture load of two all-ceramic crown systems", J Prosthet Dent, 92, pp.551~556 (2004)
  28. Joda T, "Influence of Abutment Design on Stiffness, Strength, and Failure of Implant-Supported Monolithic Resin Nano Ceramic (RNC)Crowns", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res (2014)
  29. Chen C, "The fracture resistance of a CAD", CAM Resin Nano Ceramic (RNC) and a CAD ceramic at different thicknesses, 2014, pp.30, 954~962
  30. Sundh A, "Fracture resistance of yttrium oxide partially-stabilized zirconia all-ceramic bridges after veneering and mechanical fatigue testing", Dent Mater, 21, pp.476~482 (2005)
  31. Scherrer SS, "The fracture resistance of all-ceramic crowns on supporting structures with different elastic moduli", Int J Prosthodont, 6, pp.462~467 (1993)
  32. Rosentritt M, "In vitro fracture force and marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns fixed on natural and artificial teeth", Int J Prosthodont, 13, pp.387~391 (2000)

관련 논문AI추천

In vitro evaluation of fracture strength of zirconia restoration veneered with various ceramic materials김성훈, 여인성, 이재봉, 최유성, 한중석대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2012 · 제4권 제3호Effects of core characters and veneering technique on biaxial flexural strength in porcelain fused to metal and porcelain veneered zirconia박주미, 서재민, 송광엽, 안승근, 오주원, 이민호대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2015 · 제7권 제5호Effect of core design on fracture resistance of zirconia-lithium disilicate anterior bilayered crowns고경호, 박찬진, 조리라, 허윤혁대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2020 · 제12권 제4호The effect of zirconia framework design on the failure of all-ceramic crown under static loadingPakamard Taenguthai, Somchai Urapepon대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2015 · 제7권 제2호Comparative fracture strength analysis of Lava and Digident CAD/CAM zirconia ceramic crowns권택가, 김성훈, 백현순, 양재호, 여인성, 이재봉, 한중석대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2013 · 제5권 제2호In vitro study of the fracture resistance of monolithic lithium disilicate, monolithic zirconia, and lithium disilicate pressed on zirconia for three-unit fixed dental prostheses김소연, 배은빈, 배지현, 최재원, 허중보대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2017 · 제9권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)