Comparison of different impression techniques for edentulous jaws using three-dimensional analysis
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to compare two novel impression methods and a conventional impression method for edentulous jaws using 3-dimensional (3D) analysis software. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Five edentulous patients (four men and one woman; mean age: 62.7 years) were included. Three impression techniques were used: conventional impression method (CI; control), simple modified closed-mouth impression method with a novel tray (SI), and digital impression method using an intraoral scanner (DI). Subsequently, a gypsum model was made, scanned, and superimposed using 3D analysis software. Mean area displacement was measured using CI method to evaluate differences in the impression surfaces as compared to those values obtained using SI and DI methods. The values were confirmed at two to five areas to determine the differences. CI and SI were compared at all areas, while CI and DI were compared at the supporting areas. Kruskal-Wallis test was performed for all data. Statistical significance was considered at P-value < .05. RESULTS. In the comparison of the CI and SI methods, the greatest difference was observed in the mandibular vestibule without statistical significance (P > .05); the difference was < 0.14 mm in the maxilla. The difference in the edentulous supporting areas between the CI and DI methods was not significant (P > .05). CONCLUSION. The CI, SI, and DI methods were effective in making impressions of the supporting areas in edentulous patients. The SI method showed clinically applicability.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to compare two novel impression methods and a conventional impression method for edentulous jaws using 3-dimensional (3D) analysis software. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Five edentulous patients (four men and one woman; mean age: 62.7 years) were included. Three impression techniques were used: conventional impression method (CI; control), simple modified closed-mouth impression method with a novel tray (SI), and digital impression method using an intraoral scanner (DI). Subsequently, a gypsum model was made, scanned, and superimposed using 3D analysis software. Mean area displacement was measured using CI method to evaluate differences in the impression surfaces as compared to those values obtained using SI and DI methods. The values were confirmed at two to five areas to determine the differences. CI and SI were compared at all areas, while CI and DI were compared at the supporting areas. Kruskal-Wallis test was performed for all data. Statistical significance was considered at P-value < .05. RESULTS. In the comparison of the CI and SI methods, the greatest difference was observed in the mandibular vestibule without statistical significance (P > .05); the difference was < 0.14 mm in the maxilla. The difference in the edentulous supporting areas between the CI and DI methods was not significant (P > .05). CONCLUSION. The CI, SI, and DI methods were effective in making impressions of the supporting areas in edentulous patients. The SI method showed clinically applicability.
참고문헌 (44)
- Beuer F, "Digital dentistry : an overview of recent developments for CAD", CAM generated restorations, 2008, pp.204, 505~511
- Zandinejad A, "Digital workflow for virtually designing and milling ceramic lithium disilicate veneers : a clinical report", Oper Dent, 40, pp.241~246 (2015)
- Wee AG, "Color accuracy of commercial digital cameras for use in dentistry", Dent Mater, 22, pp.553~559 (2006)
- Brennan J, "An introduction to digital radiography in dentistry", J Orthod, 29, pp.66~69 (2002)
- Koch GK, "Accuracy in the digital workflow : From data acquisition to the digitally milled cast", J Prosthet Dent, 115, pp.749~754 (2016)
- Neumeier TT, "Digital immediate dentures treatment : A clinical report of two patients", J Prosthet Dent, 116, pp.314~319 (2016)
- Alhassani AA, "Inferior alveolar nerve injury in implant dentistry : diagnosis, causes, prevention, and management", J Oral Implantol, 36, pp.401~407 (2010)
- Wenzel A, "A review of dentists’ use of digital radiography and caries diagnosis with digital systems", Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 35, pp.307~314 (2006)
- Brawek PK, "The clinical accuracy of single crowns exclusively fabricated by digital workflow-the comparison of two systems", Clin Oral Investig, 17, pp.2119~2125 (2013)
- Payer M, "Immediate provisional restoration of single-piece zirconia implants : a prospective case series-results after 24 months of clinical function", Clin Oral Implants Res, 24, pp.569~575 (2013)
- Joo HS, "Complete-mouth rehabilitation using a 3D printing technique and the CAD", CAM double scanning method : A clinical report, 2016, pp.116, 3~7
- Ohkubo C, "Complete denture fabrication using piezography and CAD-CAM : A clinical report", J Prosthet Dent, 119, pp.334~338 (2018)
- Wimmer T, "Complete denture fabrication supported by CAD", CAM, 2016, pp.115, 541~546
- McLaughlin JB, "Complete denture fabrication with CAD", CAM record bases, 2015, pp.114, 493~497
- Álvarez-Arenal Á, "Stress distribution in the transitional peri-implant bone in a single implant-supported prosthesis with platform-switching under different angulated loads", Odontology, 105, pp.68~75 (2017)
- Felton DA, "Predictable impression procedures for complete dentures", Dent Clin North Am, 40, pp.39~51 (1996)
- Collett HA, "Final impressions for complete dentures", J Prosthet Dent, 23, pp.250~264 (1970)
- Goodacre BJ, "Comparison of denture tooth movement between CADCAM and conventional fabrication techniques", J Prosthet Dent, 119, pp.108~115 (2018)
- Schweiger J, "Virtual evaluation for CAD-CAM-fabricated complete dentures", J Prosthet Dent, 117, pp.28~33 (2017)
- Jacob RF, "The traditional therapeutic paradigm : complete denture therapy", J Prosthet Dent, 79, pp.6~13 (1998)
- Ceruti P, "Simplified edentulous treatment : A multicenter randomized controlled trial to evaluate the timing and clinical outcomes of the technique", J Prosthet Dent, 118, pp.462~467 (2017)
- Kattadiyil MT, "Clinical complications and quality assessments with computer-engineered complete dentures : A systematic review", J Prosthet Dent, 117, pp.721~728 (2017)
- Fang JH, "Development of complete dentures based on digital intraoral impressions-Case report", J Prosthodont Res, 62, pp.116~120 (2018)
- Alsharbaty MHM, "A clinical comparative study of 3-dimensional accuracy between digital and conventional implant impression techniques", J Prosthodont, 28, pp.e902~e908 (2019)
- Gan N, "Accuracy of intraoral digital impressions for whole upper jaws, including full dentitions and palatal soft tissues", PLoS One, 11, pp.e0158800~ (2016)
- Sharma S, "Impression; Digital vs. conventional: A review", Ann Dent Spec, 2, pp.9~10 (2014)
- Birnbaum NS, "Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners : virtual becomes reality", Compend Contin Educ Dent, 29, pp.494~ (2008)
- 허유리, "Contour of lingual surface in lower complete denture formed by polished surface impression", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 8(6), pp.472~478 (2016), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Park C, "A new fast and simple border molding process for complete den-tures using a compound stick gun", Int J Prosthodont, 29, pp.559~560 (2016)
- Dawson PE, "Evaluation, diagnosis and treatment of occlusal problems", pp.41~47 (1989), Mosby
- Collett HA, "Complete denture impressions", J Prosthet Dent, 15, pp.603~614 (1965)
- Matsuda T, "Digital assessment of preliminary impression accuracy for edentulous jaws : Comparisons of 3-dimensional surfaces between study and working casts", J Prosthodont Res, 60, pp.206~212 (2016)
- Yoon HI, "Evaluation of the trueness and tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM mandibular denture bases manufactured using digital light processing", J Prosthet Dent, 120, pp.919~926 (2018)
- Pinelli LA, "In vitro comparisons of casting retention on implant abutments among commercially available and experimental castor oil-containing dental luting agents", J Prosthet Dent, 109, pp.319~324 (2013)
- Koller MM, "A comparative study of two methods for the orientation of the occlusal plane and the determination of the vertical dimension of occlusion in edentulous patients", J Oral Rehabil, 19, pp.413~425 (1992)
- Kawai Y, "Do traditional techniques produce better conventional complete dentures than simplified techniques?", J Dent, 33, pp.659~668 (2005)
- Chaware SH, "Tissue stress evaluation at border seal area using patient-manipulated custom tray-modified closed-mouth functional technique for flat mandibular ridges", J Int Oral Health, 10, pp.77~82 (2018)
- Azzam MK, "The sublingual crescent extension and its relation to the stability and retention of mandibular complete dentures", J Prosthet Dent, 67, pp.205~210 (1992)
- Kim JE, "Accuracy of intraoral digital impressions using an artificial landmark", J Prosthet Dent, 117, pp.755~761 (2017)
- Logozzo S, "Recent advances in dental optics-Part I : 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry", Opt Lasers Eng, 54, pp.203~221 (2014)
- Patzelt SB, "Accuracy of computeraided design", computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data, 2014, pp.145, 1133~1140
- Flügge TV, "Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 144, pp.471~478 (2013)
- Ender A, "Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions : a new method of measuring trueness and precision", J Prosthet Dent, 109, pp.121~128 (2013)
- Patzelt SB, "Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners", Clin Oral Investig, 18, pp.1687~1694 (2014)