The comparison of the accuracy of temporary crowns fabricated with several 3D printers and a milling machine
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the accuracy of various 3D printers and a milling machine. Materials and methods. The die model was designed using CAD (Autodesk Inventor 2018 sp3). The 30 µm cement space was given to the die and the ideal crown of the mandibular left first molar was designed using CAD (ExoCAD). The crowns were produced using the milling machine (Imes-icore 250i) and the 3D printers (Zenith U, Zenith D, W11) and they were divided into four groups. In all groups, the interior of each crown was scanned (Identica blue) and superimposed (Geomagic Control X) with the previously designed die. The difference between the die and the actual crown was measured at specific points. The Kruskal-Wallis test, the Mann-Whitney test, and Bonferroni’s method were performed with a statistical analysis software (P < .008 in inter-group comparison P < .001 in intra-group comparison). Results. In all groups, the center of the occlusal area and the anti-rotational dimple area showed significantly greater difference and the marginal area showed the smallest difference comparatively. The mean value of the difference in each area and the sum of the differences were higher in order of W11, Imes-icore 250i, Zenith D, and Zenith U. Conclusion. The digital light processing (DLP) method shows higher accuracy compared to the sereolithography (SLA) method using the same resin material. [J Adv Prosthodont 2023;15:72-9]
Abstract
Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the accuracy of various 3D printers and a milling machine. Materials and methods. The die model was designed using CAD (Autodesk Inventor 2018 sp3). The 30 µm cement space was given to the die and the ideal crown of the mandibular left first molar was designed using CAD (ExoCAD). The crowns were produced using the milling machine (Imes-icore 250i) and the 3D printers (Zenith U, Zenith D, W11) and they were divided into four groups. In all groups, the interior of each crown was scanned (Identica blue) and superimposed (Geomagic Control X) with the previously designed die. The difference between the die and the actual crown was measured at specific points. The Kruskal-Wallis test, the Mann-Whitney test, and Bonferroni’s method were performed with a statistical analysis software (P < .008 in inter-group comparison P < .001 in intra-group comparison). Results. In all groups, the center of the occlusal area and the anti-rotational dimple area showed significantly greater difference and the marginal area showed the smallest difference comparatively. The mean value of the difference in each area and the sum of the differences were higher in order of W11, Imes-icore 250i, Zenith D, and Zenith U. Conclusion. The digital light processing (DLP) method shows higher accuracy compared to the sereolithography (SLA) method using the same resin material. [J Adv Prosthodont 2023;15:72-9]
참고문헌 (20)
- Katkar RA, "3D volume rendering and 3D printing(additive manufacturing)", Dent Clin North Am, 62, pp.393~402 (2018)
- Moser N, "From 3D imaging to 3D printing in dentistry-a practical guide", Int J Comput Dent, 21, pp.345~356 (2018)
- Dawood A, "3D printing in dentistry", Br Dent J, 219, pp.521~529 (2015)
- Alharbi N, "Additive manufacturing techniques in prosthodontics: Where do we currently stand? a critical review", Int J Prosthodont, 30, pp.474~484 (2017)
- Melchels FP, "A review on stereolithography and its applications in biomedical engineering", Biomaterials, 31, pp.6121~6130 (2010)
- Torabi K, "Rapid prototyping technologies and their applications in prosthodontics, a review of literature", J Dent(Shiraz), 16, pp.1~9 (2015)
- Beguma Z, "Rapid prototyping-when virtual meets reality", Int J Comput Dent, 17, pp.297~306 (2014)
- Ma XL, "Research on application of SLA technology in the 3D printing technology", Applied Mechanics and Materials : Trans Tech Publ, pp.938~941 (2013)
- Borrello J, "3D printing a mechanically-tunable acrylate resin on a commercial DLP-SLA printer", Addit Manuf, 23, pp.374~380 (2018)
- Alharbi N, "Factors influencing the dimensional accuracy of 3D-printed full-coverage dental restorations using stereolithography technology", Int J Prosthodont, 29, pp.503~510 (2016)
- Hong H, "Digital light processing 3D printed silk fibroin hydrogel for cartilage tissue engineering", Biomaterials, 232, pp.119679~ (2020)
- He R, "Fabrication of complex-shaped zirconia ceramic parts via a DLP-stereolithography-based 3D printing method", Ceram Int, 44, pp.3412~3416 (2018)
- Mu Q, "Digital light processing 3D printing of conductive complex structures", Addit Manuf, 18, pp.74~83 (2017)
- Patel DK, "Highly stretchable and UV curable elastomers for digital light processing based 3D printing", Adv Mater, 29(15) (2017)
- Della Bona A, "3D printing restorative materials using a stereolithographic technique : a systematic review", Dent Mater, 37, pp.336~350 (2021)
- Yang Y, "Printability of external and internal structures based on digital light processing 3D printing technique", Pharmaceutics, 12, pp.207~ (2020)
- Lee D, "A hybrid dental model concept utilizing fused deposition modeling and digital light processing 3D printing", Int J Prosthodont, 33, pp.229~231 (2020)
- Wang Z, "Rapid fabrication of multilayer microfluidic devices using the liquid crystal display-based stereolithography 3D printing system", 3D Pr Addit Manuf, 4, pp.156~164 (2017)
- Mohamed MGA, "Rapid and inexpensive fabrication of multidepth microfluidic device using high-resolution LCD stereolithographic 3D printing", J Manuf Mater Process, 3, pp.26~ (2019)
- Osman RB, "Build angle : Does it influence the accuracy of 3D-printed dental restorations using digital light-processing technology?", Int J Prosthodont, 30, pp.182~188 (2017)