Evaluation of intaglio surface trueness, wear, and fracture resistance of zirconia crown under simulated mastication: a comparative analysis between subtractive and additive manufacturing
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. This in-vitro analysis aimed to compare the intaglio trueness, the antagonist’s wear volume loss, and fracture load of various single-unit zirconia prostheses fabricated by different manufacturing techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Zirconia crowns were prepared into four different groups (n = 14 per group) according to the manufacturing techniques and generations of the materials. The intaglio surface trueness (root-mean-square estimates, RMS) of the crown was measured at the marginal, axial, occlusal, and inner surface areas. Half of the specimens were artificially aged in the chewing simulator with 120,000 cycles, and the antagonist’s volume loss after aging was calculated. The fracture load for each crown group was measured before and after hydrothermal aging. The intaglio trueness was evaluated with Welch’s ANOVA and the antagonist’s volume loss was assessed by the Kruskal-Wallis tests. The effects of manufacturing and aging on the fracture resistance of the tested zirconia crowns were determined by two-way ANOVA. RESULTS. The trueness analysis of the crown intaglio surfaces showed surface deviation (RMS) within 50 μm, regardless of the manufacturing methods (P = .053). After simulated mastication, no significant differences in the volume loss of the antagonists were observed among the zirconia groups (P = .946). The manufacturing methods and simulated chewing had statistically significant effects on the fracture resistance (P < .001). CONCLUSION. The intaglio surface trueness, fracture resistance, and antagonist’s wear volume of the additively manufactured 3Y-TZP crown were clinically acceptable, as compared with those of the 4Y- or 5Y-PSZ crowns produced by subtractive milling.
Abstract
PURPOSE. This in-vitro analysis aimed to compare the intaglio trueness, the antagonist’s wear volume loss, and fracture load of various single-unit zirconia prostheses fabricated by different manufacturing techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Zirconia crowns were prepared into four different groups (n = 14 per group) according to the manufacturing techniques and generations of the materials. The intaglio surface trueness (root-mean-square estimates, RMS) of the crown was measured at the marginal, axial, occlusal, and inner surface areas. Half of the specimens were artificially aged in the chewing simulator with 120,000 cycles, and the antagonist’s volume loss after aging was calculated. The fracture load for each crown group was measured before and after hydrothermal aging. The intaglio trueness was evaluated with Welch’s ANOVA and the antagonist’s volume loss was assessed by the Kruskal-Wallis tests. The effects of manufacturing and aging on the fracture resistance of the tested zirconia crowns were determined by two-way ANOVA. RESULTS. The trueness analysis of the crown intaglio surfaces showed surface deviation (RMS) within 50 μm, regardless of the manufacturing methods (P = .053). After simulated mastication, no significant differences in the volume loss of the antagonists were observed among the zirconia groups (P = .946). The manufacturing methods and simulated chewing had statistically significant effects on the fracture resistance (P < .001). CONCLUSION. The intaglio surface trueness, fracture resistance, and antagonist’s wear volume of the additively manufactured 3Y-TZP crown were clinically acceptable, as compared with those of the 4Y- or 5Y-PSZ crowns produced by subtractive milling.
참고문헌 (32)
- Gautam C, "Zirconia based dental ceramics: structure, mechanical properties, biocompatibility and applications", Dalton Trans, 45, pp.19194~19215 (2016)
- Denry I, "State of the art of zirconia for dental applications", Dent Mater, 24, pp.299~307 (2008)
- Stawarczyk B, "Three generations of zirconia:From veneered to monolithic. Part II", Quintessence Int, 48, pp.441~450 (2017)
- Kolakarnprasert N, "New multi-layered zirconias: Composition, microstructure and translucency", Dent Mater, 35, pp.797~806 (2019)
- Malkondu Ö, "An overview of monolithic zirconia in dentistry", Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip, 30, pp.644~652 (2016)
- Abduo J, "Fit of zirconia fixed partial denture : a systematic review", J Oral Rehabil, 37, pp.866~876 (2010)
- Att W, "Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses", J Prosthet Dent, 101, pp.239~247 (2009)
- van Noort R, "The future of dental devices is digital", Dent Mater, 28, pp.3~12 (2012)
- Schriwer C, "Monolithic zirconia dental crowns. Internal fit, margin quality, fracture mode and load at fracture", Dent Mater, 33, pp.1012~1020 (2017)
- Strub JR, "Computer-aided design and fabrication of dental restorations : current systems and future possibilities", J Am Dent Assoc, 137, pp.1289~1296 (2006)
- Khanlar LN, "Additive manufacturing of zirconia ceramic and its application in clinical dentistry: a review", Dent J(Basel), 9, pp.104~ (2021)
- Torabi K, "Rapid prototyping technologies and their applications in prosthodontics, a review of literature", J Dent(Shiraz), 16, pp.1~9 (2015)
- Schwentenwein M, "Additive manufacturing of dense alumina ceramics", Int J Appl Ceram Technol, 12, pp.1~7 (2014)
- Ebert J, "Direct inkjet printing of dental prostheses made of zirconia", J Dent Res, 88, pp.673~676 (2009)
- Wang W, "Dimensional accuracy and clinical adaptation of ceramic crowns fabricated with the stereolithography technique", J Prosthet Dent, 125, pp.657~663 (2021)
- Wang W, "Trueness analysis of zirconia crowns fabricated with 3-dimensional printing", J Prosthet Dent, 121, pp.285~291 (2019)
- Li R, "Performance of stereolithography and milling in fabricating monolithic zirconia crowns with different finish line designs", J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 115, pp.104255~ (2021)
- Lerner H, "Trueness and precision of 3D-printed versus milled monolithic zirconia crowns : An in vitro study", J Dent, 113, pp.103792~ (2021)
- Revilla-León M, "Internal and marginal discrepancies associated with stereolithography(SLA)additively manufactured zirconia crowns", J Prosthet Dent, 124, pp.730~737 (2020)
- Revilla-León M, "Flexural strength and Weibull characteristics of stereolithography additive manufactured versus milled zirconia", J Prosthet Dent, 125, pp.685~690 (2021)
- Ioannidis A, "Load-bearing capacity of CAD", CAM 3D-printed zirconia, CAD, Dent Mater, pp.2020, 36[DOI]
- DeLong R, "An artificial oral environment for testing dental materials", IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 38, pp.339~345 (1991)
- Steiner M, "In vitro evaluation of a mechanical testing chewing simulator", Dent Mater, 25, pp.494~499 (2009)
- Kirsch C, "Trueness of four different milling procedures used in dental CAD", CAM systems, 2017, pp.21, 551~558
- Dikova T, "Dimensional accuracy and surface roughness of polymeric dental bridges produced by different 3D printing processes", Arch Mater Sci Eng, 94, pp.65~75 (2018)
- 최재원, "Wear of primary teeth caused by opposed all-ceramic or stainless steel crowns", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 8(1), pp.43~52 (2016), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Oh WS, "Factors affecting enamel and ceramic wear : a literature review", J Prosthet Dent, 87, pp.451~459 (2002)
- Janyavula S, "The wear of polished and glazed zirconia against enamel", J Prosthet Dent, 109, pp.22~29 (2013)
- Kohorst P, "Low-temperature degradation of different zirconia ceramics for dental applications", Acta Biomater, 8, pp.1213~1220 (2012)
- Lümkemann N, "Impact of hydrothermal aging on the light transmittance and flexural strength of colored yttria-stabilized zirconia materials of different formulations", J Prosthet Dent, 125, pp.518~526 (2021)
- Camposilvan E, "Aging resistance, mechanical properties and translucency of different yttria-stabilized zirconia ceramics for monolithic dental crown applications", Dent Mater, 34, pp.879~890 (2018)
- Wei C, "In vitro cyclic fatigue and hydro-thermal aging lifetime assessment of yttria-stabilized zirconia dental ceramics", J Eur Ceram Soc, 40, pp.4647~4654 (2020)