Trueness of 3D printed partial denture frameworks; build orientations and support structure density parameters
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The purpose of the study was to assess the influence of build orientations and density of support structures on the trueness of the 3D printed removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A maxillary Kennedy class III and mandibular class I casts were 3D scanned and used to design and produce two 3D virtual models of RPD frameworks. Using digital light processing (DLP) 3D printing, 47 RPD frameworks were fabricated at 3 different build orientations (100, 135 and 150-degree angles) and 2 support structure densities. All frameworks were scanned and 3D compared to the original virtual RPD models by metrology software to check 3D deviations quantitatively and qualitatively. The accuracy data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA for build orientation comparison and independent sample t-test for structure density comparison at (α = .05). Points study analysis targeting RPD components and representative color maps were also studied. RESULTS. The build orientation of 135-degree angle of the maxillary frameworks showed the lowest deviation at the clasp arms of tooth 26 of the 135-degree angle group. The mandibular frameworks with 150-degree angle build orientation showed the least deviation at the rest on tooth 44 and the arm of the I-bar clasp of tooth 45. No significant difference was seen between different support structure densities. CONCLUSION. Build orientation had an influence on the accuracy of the frameworks, especially at a 135-degree angle of maxillary design and 150-degree of mandibular design. The difference in the support’s density structure revealed no considerable effect on the accuracy.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The purpose of the study was to assess the influence of build orientations and density of support structures on the trueness of the 3D printed removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A maxillary Kennedy class III and mandibular class I casts were 3D scanned and used to design and produce two 3D virtual models of RPD frameworks. Using digital light processing (DLP) 3D printing, 47 RPD frameworks were fabricated at 3 different build orientations (100, 135 and 150-degree angles) and 2 support structure densities. All frameworks were scanned and 3D compared to the original virtual RPD models by metrology software to check 3D deviations quantitatively and qualitatively. The accuracy data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA for build orientation comparison and independent sample t-test for structure density comparison at (α = .05). Points study analysis targeting RPD components and representative color maps were also studied. RESULTS. The build orientation of 135-degree angle of the maxillary frameworks showed the lowest deviation at the clasp arms of tooth 26 of the 135-degree angle group. The mandibular frameworks with 150-degree angle build orientation showed the least deviation at the rest on tooth 44 and the arm of the I-bar clasp of tooth 45. No significant difference was seen between different support structure densities. CONCLUSION. Build orientation had an influence on the accuracy of the frameworks, especially at a 135-degree angle of maxillary design and 150-degree of mandibular design. The difference in the support’s density structure revealed no considerable effect on the accuracy.
참고문헌 (25)
- Negm EE, "Virtual evaluation of the accuracy of fit and trueness in maxillary poly(etheretherketone)removable partial denture frameworks fabricated by direct and indirect CAD", CAM techniques, 2019, pp.28, 804~810
- Aarts JM, "Influence of build angulation on the mechanical properties of a direct-metal laser-sintered cobalt-chromium used for removable partial denture frameworks", J Prosthet Dent, 126, pp.224~230 (2021)
- Xie W, "The effect of build orientation on the microstructure and properties of selective laser melting Ti-6Al-4V for removable partial denture clasps", J Prosthet Dent, 123, pp.163~172 (2020)
- AlMangour B, "Effect of processing parameters on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Co-Cr-Mo alloy fabricated by selective laser melting", Mater Sci Eng A, 792, pp.139456~ (2020)
- Ahmed N, "Fit accuracy of removable partial denture frameworks fabricated with cad", cam, rapid prototyping, and conventional techniques: A systematic review, 2021, pp.2021, 3194433~
- No-Cortes J, "Trueness, 3D deviation, time and cost comparisons between milled and 3d-printed resin single crowns", Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 30, pp.107~112 (2022)
- Oropallo W, "Ten challenges in 3D printing", Eng Comput, 32, pp.135~148 (2016)
- Hussein MO, "Optimization of digital light processing three-dimensional printing of the removable partial denture frameworks; the role of build angle and support structure diameter", Materials(Basel), 15, pp.2316~ (2022)
- Hwang S, "Process parameter optimization for removable partial denture frameworks manufactured by selective laser melting", J Prosthet Dent (2021)
- Srinivasan M, "CAD-CAM removable complete dentures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of trueness of fit, biocompatibility, mechanical properties, surface characteristics, color stability, time-cost analysis, clinical and patient-reported outcomes", J Dent, 113, pp.103777~ (2021)
- Unkovskiy A, "Stereolithography vs. Direct light processing for rapid manufacturing of complete denture bases: an in vitro accuracy analysis", J Clin Med, 10, pp.1070~1081 (2021)
- 류지은, "Marginal and internal fit of 3D printed provisional crowns according to build directions", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 12(4), pp.225~232 (2020), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Çakmak G, "Effect of printing layer thickness on the trueness and margin quality of 3D-printed interim dental crowns", Appl Sci, 11, pp.9246~9256 (2021)
- Ravi P, "A focused simulation-based optimization of print time and material usage with respect to orientation, layer height and support settings for multi-pathological anatomical models in inverted vat photopolymerization 3D printing", 3D Print Med, 7, pp.1~13 (2021)
- Park GS, "Effects of printing parameters on the fit of implant-supported 3D printing resin prosthetics", Materials(Basel), 12, pp.2533~2546 (2019)
- Hada T, "Effect of printing direction on the accuracy of 3D-printed dentures using stereolithography technology", Materials(Basel), 13, pp.3405~3417 (2020)
- Jin MC, "The effect of build angle on the tissue surface adaptation of maxillary and mandibular complete denture bases manufactured by digital light processing", J Prosthet Dent, 123, pp.473~482 (2020)
- Alharbi N, "Factors Influencing the dimensional accuracy of 3D-printed full-coverage dental restorations using stereolithography technology", Int J Prosthodont, 29, pp.503~510 (2016)
- Rubayo DD, "Influences of build angle on the accuracy, printing time, and material consumption of additively manufactured surgical templates", J Prosthet Dent, 126, pp.658~663 (2021)
- Son K, "Marginal and internal fit and intaglio surface trueness of interim crowns fabricated from tooth preparation of four finish line locations", Sci Rep, 11, pp.13947~13957 (2021)
- Rungrojwittayakul O, "Accuracy of 3D printed models created by two technologies of printers with different designs of model base", J Prosthodont, 29, pp.124~128 (2020)
- "ISO 5725-1. Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of measurement methods and results-part 1: general principles and definitions", International Organization of Standardization, (ISO), ~ (1998)
- "Asiga MAX User Guide" (2017)[URL]
- Tasaka A, "Accuracy of removable partial denture framework fabricated by casting with a 3D printed pattern and selective laser sintering", J Prosthodont Res, 64, pp.224~230 (2020)
- Schweiger J, "3D printing in digital prosthetic dentistry : an overview of recent developments in additive manufacturing", J Clin Med, 10, pp.2010~ (2021)