Performance Evaluation of Body Fluid Cellular Analysis Using the Beckman Coulter UniCel DxH 800, Sysmex XN-350, and UF-5000 Automated Cellular Analyzers
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: Automated cellular analyzers are expected to improve the analytical performance in body fluid (BF) analysis. We evaluated the analytical performance of three automated cellular analyzers and established optimum reflex analysis guidelines. Methods: A total of 542 BF samples (88 cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] samples and 454 non-CSF samples) were examined using manual counting and three automated cellular analyzers: UniCel DxH 800 (Beckman Coulter), XN-350 (Sysmex), and UF-5000 (Sysmex). Additionally, 2,779 BF analysis results were retrospectively reviewed. For malignant cell analysis, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used, and the detection of high fluorescence-BF cells (HF-BFs) using the XN-350 analyzer was compared with cytology results. Results: All three analyzers showed good agreement for total nucleated cell (TNC) and red blood cell (RBC) counts, except for the RBC count in CSF samples using the UniCel DxH 800. However, variable degrees of differences were observed during differential cell counting. For malignant cell analysis, the area under the curve was 0.63 for the XN-350 analyzer and 0.76 for manual counting. We established our own reflex analysis guidelines as follows: HF-BFs <0.7/100 white blood cells (WBCs) is the criterion for quick scans with 100× magnification microscopic examination as a rule-out cut-off, while HF-BFs >83.4/100 WBCs or eosinophils >3.8% are the criteria for mandatory double check confirmation with 1,000× magnification examination. Conclusions: The three automated analyzers showed good analytical performances. Application of reflex analysis guidelines is recommended for eosinophils and HF-BFs, and manual confirmation is warranted.
Abstract
Background: Automated cellular analyzers are expected to improve the analytical performance in body fluid (BF) analysis. We evaluated the analytical performance of three automated cellular analyzers and established optimum reflex analysis guidelines. Methods: A total of 542 BF samples (88 cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] samples and 454 non-CSF samples) were examined using manual counting and three automated cellular analyzers: UniCel DxH 800 (Beckman Coulter), XN-350 (Sysmex), and UF-5000 (Sysmex). Additionally, 2,779 BF analysis results were retrospectively reviewed. For malignant cell analysis, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used, and the detection of high fluorescence-BF cells (HF-BFs) using the XN-350 analyzer was compared with cytology results. Results: All three analyzers showed good agreement for total nucleated cell (TNC) and red blood cell (RBC) counts, except for the RBC count in CSF samples using the UniCel DxH 800. However, variable degrees of differences were observed during differential cell counting. For malignant cell analysis, the area under the curve was 0.63 for the XN-350 analyzer and 0.76 for manual counting. We established our own reflex analysis guidelines as follows: HF-BFs <0.7/100 white blood cells (WBCs) is the criterion for quick scans with 100× magnification microscopic examination as a rule-out cut-off, while HF-BFs >83.4/100 WBCs or eosinophils >3.8% are the criteria for mandatory double check confirmation with 1,000× magnification examination. Conclusions: The three automated analyzers showed good analytical performances. Application of reflex analysis guidelines is recommended for eosinophils and HF-BFs, and manual confirmation is warranted.
참고문헌 (25)
- Sandhaus LM, "Body fluid cell counts by automated methods", Clin Lab Med, 35, pp.93~103 (2015)
- Fleming C, "Clinical relevance and contemporary methods for counting blood cells in body fluids suspected of inflammatory disease", Clin Chem Lab Med, 53, pp.1689~1706 (2015)
- Yang D, "Performance evaluation and result comparison of the automated hematology analyzers Abbott CD 3700, Sysmex XE 2100 and Coulter LH 750 for cell counts in serous fluids", Clin Chim Acta, 419, pp.113~118 (2013)
- CLSI, "Body fluid analysis for cellular composition; Approved guideline" (2006), Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
- Cho YU, "Validation of reflex testing rules and establishment of a new workflow for body fluid cell analysis using a Sysmex XN-550 automatic hematology analyzer", Int J Lab Hematol, 40, pp.258~267 (2018)
- Fleming C, "UF-1000i : validation of the body fluid mode for counting cells in body fluids", Clin Chem Lab Med, 52, pp.1781~1790 (2014)
- Nanos NE, "Evaluation of Sysmex UF-1000i for use in cerebrospinal fluid analysis", Clin Chim Acta, 392, pp.30~33 (2008)
- Cho YU, "Body fluid cellular analysis using the Sysmex XN-2000 automatic hematology analyzer : focusing on malignant samples", Int J Lab Hematol, 37, pp.346~356 (2015)
- Bourner G, "ICSH guidelines for the verification and performance of automated cell counters for body fluids", Int J Lab Hematol, 36, pp.598~612 (2014)
- Sandhaus LM, "A new automated technology for cerebrospinal fluid cell counts: comparison of accuracy and clinical impact of GloCyte, Sysmex XN, and manual methods", Am J Clin Pathol, 147, pp.507~514 (2017)
- Fleming C, "Evaluation of Sysmex XN-1000 high-sensitive analysis(hsA)research mode for counting and differentiating cells in cerebrospinal fluid", Am J Clin Pathol, 145, pp.299~307 (2016)
- Danise P, "Cell counting of body fluids: comparison between three automated haematology analysers and the manual microscope method", Int J Lab Hematol, 35, pp.608~613 (2013)
- Lehto TM, "Evaluation of the Sysmex XT-4000i for the automated body fluid analysis", Int J Lab Hematol, 36, pp.114~123 (2014)
- Fleming C, "Validation of the body fluid module on the new Sysmex XN-1000 for counting blood cells in cerebrospinal fluid and other body fluids", Clin Chem Lab Med, 50, pp.1791~1798 (2012)
- Labaere D, "Detection of malignant cells in serous body fluids by counting high-fluorescent cells on the Sysmex XN-2000 hematology analyzer", Int J Lab Hematol, 37, pp.715~722 (2015)
- Beckman Coulter Inc, "Coulter cellular analysis system instructions cellular analysis system instructions for use: use: PN B26647AE", pp.127~ (2017), Beckman Coulter, Inc
- Previtali G, "Performance evaluation of the new fully automated urine particle analyser UF-5000 compared to the reference method of the Fuchs-Rosenthal chamber", Clin Chim Acta, 472, pp.123~130 (2017)
- Seghezzi M, "Preliminary evaluation of UF-5000 Body Fluid Mode for automated cerebrospinal fluid cell counting", Clin Chim Acta, 473, pp.133~138 (2017)
- Buoro S, "Automated cerebrospinal fluid cell counts using cerebrospinal fluid cell counts using the new body fluid mode of Sysmex UF-1000i", J Clin Lab Anal, 30, pp.381~391 (2016)
- CLSI, "User verification of performance for precision and trueness approved guideline" (2006), Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
- CLSI, "Evaluation of the linearity of quantitative measurement procedures: a statistical approach; approved guideline. CLSI approach approved guideline" (2003), Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
- CLSI, "CLSI measurement procedures approved guideline" (2012), Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
- "Desirable biological variation database specifications"[URL]
- CLSI, "Method comparison and bias estimation using patient samples; approved guideline" (2010), Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
- Buoro S, "Reflex testing rules for cell count and differentiation of nucleated elements in pleural and ascitic fluids on Sysmex XE-5000", J Lab Autom, 21, pp.297~304 (2016)