고대 중국어 중간구문의 의미 기능 분석
A Semantic Analysis of Middle Construction in Ancient Chinese
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examines the semantic characteristics of the middle construc- tion in ancient Chinese based on the existing discussion on the middle construction. The middle construction is one of special structures that has the verb form of an active sentence, even though it is close to passive sentence, because the object of a transitive verb is placed on the position of the subject. The middle construction has the characteristics of being concurrent with the implicit agent, non-eventive state, present tense, the use of adverb words, and the meaning of possibility and expresses the change of a state, due to the intrinsic nature of a passive subject. While, there was a point that is intersected categorically between the active sentence and passive sentence in view of the construction of ‘可/足’ and ‘難/易’ in ancient Chinese, it is an issue that the specificity of these structures is overlooked. Therefore, this study investigates the semantics of the middle construction in ancient Chinese with ‘可/足’ and ‘難/易’ in a way that the construction of ‘可/足’ and ‘難/易’ corresponds to the middle construction that shows the possibility of a state change and the possibility degree due to the attributes of passive subject.
Abstract
This study examines the semantic characteristics of the middle construc- tion in ancient Chinese based on the existing discussion on the middle construction. The middle construction is one of special structures that has the verb form of an active sentence, even though it is close to passive sentence, because the object of a transitive verb is placed on the position of the subject. The middle construction has the characteristics of being concurrent with the implicit agent, non-eventive state, present tense, the use of adverb words, and the meaning of possibility and expresses the change of a state, due to the intrinsic nature of a passive subject. While, there was a point that is intersected categorically between the active sentence and passive sentence in view of the construction of ‘可/足’ and ‘難/易’ in ancient Chinese, it is an issue that the specificity of these structures is overlooked. Therefore, this study investigates the semantics of the middle construction in ancient Chinese with ‘可/足’ and ‘難/易’ in a way that the construction of ‘可/足’ and ‘難/易’ corresponds to the middle construction that shows the possibility of a state change and the possibility degree due to the attributes of passive subject.
참고문헌 (46)
- 김윤정, "현대중국어 결과보어의 중간문 기제로서의 가능성 탐색", 언어과학연구, 1(29), pp.67~88 (2004), 언어과학회
- 김혜경, "현대중국어 중간문(Middle Construction)에 관한 고찰", 중국어교육과 연구, (13), pp.165~187 (2011), 한국중국어교육학회
- 남수경, "한국어 피동문 연구" (2011), 월인
- 박상수, "중간구문의 통사-의미 구조", 현대문법연구, 7 (1996)
- 백정화, "한국어 피동문의 유형론적 연구" (2019), 한국문화사
- 양류, "현대중국어 조동사 ‘好’의 기능 분석 - 중간 범주와 타동성의 시각으로 -", 중국언어연구, (97), pp.239~262 (2021), 한국중국언어학회[DOI]
- YANG LIU, "중국어 ‘NP+好+VP’중간 구문과 한국어 대응 표현 대조 연구: 인지언어학적 관점을 바탕으로", 중어중문학, (90), pp.379~404 (2022), 한국중어중문학회[DOI]
- 연재훈, "한국어 구문 유형론" (2011), 태학사
- 요진우, "한문문법의 분석적이해" (2001), 계명대학교출판사
- 이지현, "현대 중국어 ‘NPP+V起來+AP’형식 분석 ― 중간태 구문과의 비교를 중심으로", 중국어문학논집, (52), pp.109~130 (2008), 중국어문학연구회
- 이지현, "현대 중국어 중간 구문의 인지 의미 분석-‘好+V’ 형식을 중심으로 -", 중국어문학지, (36), pp.145~177 (2011), 중국어문학회
- 이지현, "상황 유형에 근거한 중국어의 중간 범주 모색 ― 인구어와의 대조를 중심으로 ―", 중국언어연구, (41), pp.85~117 (2012), 한국중국언어학회
- 장염, "언어유형론적 시각에서 본 한국어“NP+AP+V” 중간 구문과 중국어“NP+V起来+AP” 중간 구문", 중국인문과학, (72), pp.197~215 (2019), 중국인문학회[DOI]
- 전부미, "중간구문의 구조와 성향성", 영어학, 13(4), pp.913~935 (2013), 한국영어학회[DOI]
- 전부미, "Tough 구문의 책임의미와 성향귀속", 언어과학, 19(4), pp.203~222 (2012), 한국언어과학회
- 홍소영, "현대 중국어 ‘NP+好+V’구문의 의미 분석", 중국어문논총, (86), pp.83~101 (2018), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
- 蔡淑美, "類型學視野下的中動範疇和漢語中動句式群", 世界漢語教學, (2) (2015)
- 曹宏, "中動句式對動詞形容詞的選擇限制及其理據", 語言科學, (1) (2004)
- 曹宏, "論中動句的句法構造特點", 世界漢語教學, (3) (2004)
- 董成如, "也談漢語中動句的句法語義特徵及相關問題", 當代語言學, (4) (2021)
- 丁還燕, "漢語形源助動詞形成的句法機制", 古漢語研究, (3) (2012)
- 古川裕, "現代漢語的“中動語態句式(middle construction)”-語態變換的句法 實現和詞法實現", 漢語學報, (2) (2005)
- 胡麗珍, "“NP+好+V", A”的多義同構性及其承繼理據的歷時考察, 2013, pp.(5), ~
- 胡旭輝, "跨語言視角下的漢語中動句研究", 當代語言學, (1) (2019)
- 何文忠, "中動結構的界定", 外語教學, (4) (2005)
- 何文忠, "中動構句選擇限制的認知闡釋", 外語研究, (1) (2007)
- 何元建, "現代漢語中間句的句法結構", 漢語學習, (1) (2010)
- 李明, "漢語助動詞的歷史演變研究", 博士, pp.2001
- 李炎燕, "漢語中動句式的歷時演變解析", 長沙大學學報, (6) (2021)
- 劉利, "先秦漢語助動詞研究" (2000), 北京師範大學出版社
- 呂叔湘, "中國文法要略" (2004), 商務印書館
- 馬建忠, "馬氏文通" (1898), 商務印書館
- 齊滬揚, "“V起來”的語義分化及相關問題", 漢語學習, (2) (2009)
- 任荷, "先秦漢語“難”字句的句法結構及其來源", 中國語文, (3) (2021)
- 太田辰夫, "中國語歷史文法" (2003), 北京大學出版社
- 王力, "漢語語法史" (2003), 商務印書館
- 熊仲儒, "“NP+好VP”的句法分析", 當代語言學, (1) (2011)
- 熊仲儒, "“V-起來AP”的結構分析", 漢語學習, (2) (2022)
- 徐盛桓, "語義數量特徵與英語中動結構", 外語敎學與硏究, (6) (2002)
- 張定, "助動詞“好”的語法化及相關詞彙化現象", 語言教學與研究, (5) (2009)
- 張廷俊, "漢語被動式歷史硏究" (2010), 中國社會科學出版社
- 趙成新, "漢英“難易”類中動句對比分析及漢語習得研究", 外文研究, (1) (2023)
- Fagan, S., "The Syntax and Semantics of Middle Constructions", pp.19~ (1992), Cambridge university press
- Keyser. S., "On the Middle and Ergative Construction in English", Linguistic Inquiry, 15 (1984)
- Palmer, F. R., "Mood and Modality" (2001), Cambridge University
- Suzanne Kemmer, "중간태" (2003), 한국문화사