‘起來’의 중간화에 관한 소고
A Study on ‘Qilai’ Middle Formation in Chinese
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, we investigated the transition process of ‘Qilai’ construction in Chinese, particularly with emphasis on evaluative ‘Qilai’ and we have found a few facts. First, it is also valid to divide the phrase ‘Qilai’ into expressions A type and M type based on the semantic orientation of the AP, that is, we have looked from A type to M type in the modern times. Although this has already been mentioned in previous studies, they did not clearly distinguish between A and M, or discussed together. Secondly, through the example analysis of several modern literatures, we also examined syntactic commonalities and differences in the process of transition between A type and M type. Although many expressions of M type without a comma appear today, the loss of a comma, one of the characteristics of the middle construction presented by Huang & Ma(2008: 36), is not an essential element of change, and the expansion of verb scope is more important factor in transition process. Thirdly, we can see that Evaluative ‘Qilai’ has developed into a different path of subjectivity through the common stage the deletion of agent, and unlike A type, M type is based on virtual(generic) structuring of repetitive occurrence. In short, the distinction between A tyep and M type of ‘Qilai’ is historically justified, and we can see that it contains a different internal structure of A type and M type.
Abstract
In this paper, we investigated the transition process of ‘Qilai’ construction in Chinese, particularly with emphasis on evaluative ‘Qilai’ and we have found a few facts. First, it is also valid to divide the phrase ‘Qilai’ into expressions A type and M type based on the semantic orientation of the AP, that is, we have looked from A type to M type in the modern times. Although this has already been mentioned in previous studies, they did not clearly distinguish between A and M, or discussed together. Secondly, through the example analysis of several modern literatures, we also examined syntactic commonalities and differences in the process of transition between A type and M type. Although many expressions of M type without a comma appear today, the loss of a comma, one of the characteristics of the middle construction presented by Huang & Ma(2008: 36), is not an essential element of change, and the expansion of verb scope is more important factor in transition process. Thirdly, we can see that Evaluative ‘Qilai’ has developed into a different path of subjectivity through the common stage the deletion of agent, and unlike A type, M type is based on virtual(generic) structuring of repetitive occurrence. In short, the distinction between A tyep and M type of ‘Qilai’ is historically justified, and we can see that it contains a different internal structure of A type and M type.
참고문헌 (29)
- 김윤정, "현대중국어 결과보어의 중간문 기제로서의 가능성 탐색", 언어과학연구, 1(29), pp.67~88 (2004), 언어과학회
- 이지현, "현대 중국어 중간 구문의 인지 의미 분석-‘好+V’ 형식을 중심으로 -", 중국어문학지, (36), pp.145~177 (2011), 중국어문학회
- 조경환, "중국어 구문론" (2014), 한국문화사
- 조경환, "중간문과 遭遇 把字句― 중간태와 태 전환 현상에 관한 소고", 중국어문논총, (86), pp.61~82 (2018), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
- 조경환, "‘起來’ 중간문에 관한 소고", 중국어문논총, (94), pp.1~23 (2019), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
- 曹宏, "论中动句的句法構造特點", 世界汉语敎學, 3, pp.38~47 (2004)
- 曹宏, "論中动句的語義表達特點", 中國語文, 3, pp.205~212 (2005)
- 蔡淑美, "漢語中動句的語法化歷程和演變機制", 語言敎學與硏究, 4, pp.49~59 (2015)
- 何文忠, "中动結構的認知阐释" (2007), 科學出版社
- 古川裕, "汉语被動表述問題硏究新探展" (2006), 華中師範大學出版社
- 黃冬麗, "S+V起来+AP", VP構式及其來源, 2008, pp.109, 34~37
- 齊滬揚, "‘V起來’的語義分化及相关问题", 汉语學習, 4, pp.3~11 (2009)
- 柳月華, "趋向补语通釋" (1998), 北京语言大學出版社
- 呂叔湘, "现代汉语八百词" (2000), 商務印書館
- 王永鵬, "中动句‘V+起來’句式補議", 現代語文, 11, pp.57~59 (2011)
- 餘光武, "漢語中間結構的界定-兼論‘NP+V-起來+AP’句式的分化", 语言硏究, 28, pp.69~78 (2008)
- 鐘兆華, "趋向動詞‘起來’在近代漢語中的發展", 中國語文, 5, pp.359~366 (1985)
- Chang, Shen-Min, "V-qilai Compounds in Mandarin Chinese", Proceedings of the First Pacific Asia Conference on Format and Computational Linguistics, pp.62~81 (1993)
- Chen Zhen, "The Diachronic Development and Synchronic Diversity of The Disyllabic-Directional Complements in Chinese", Doctor, pp.2006
- Concepcion Company Company, "Subjectification of Verbs Into Discourse Markers", pp.97~124 (2006), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Davidse Krisin, "On the middle voice; an interpersoanal analysis of the English Middle", Linguistics, 45, pp.37~83 (2007)
- Fagan, Sarah, "The Syntax and Semantics of Middle Constructions" (1992), Cambridge Univ. Press
- Givon, Talmy, "기능 영문법" (2002), 도서출판 박이정
- Huang, Chu-Ren, "Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language", pp.201~216 (1996), CSLI Publication
- Jen, Ting, "The Middle Construction in Mandarin Chinese and the Presyntatic Approach", Concentric : Studies in Linguistics, 32, pp.89~117 (2006)
- Langacker, Ronald, "인지문법의 토대 2" (1998), 도서출판 박이정
- Shyu Shu-ing, "An Approximation to Secondary Predication Structure: A Case of V-qilai in Mandarin Chinese", Language and Linguistics, 14(4), pp.701~736 (2013)
- Sung, kuo-ming, "Chinese Middle Construction, Case Assignment Under Incorporation, Doctoral dissertation", Doctor, pp.1994
- Wang, Chyan-an Arthur, "The Syntax and Semantics of Chinese Imperonal V-Qilai Construction", Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 16(1), pp.1~34 (2018)