현대 중국어 중간 구문의 인지 의미 분석-‘好+V’ 형식을 중심으로 -
Cognitive approach to Middle Construction of Mandarin Chinese : focused on 'Hao+V' Construction
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The middle construction is deeply cognitively motivated, which essence can only be captured from cognitive approach. Such a cognitive definition of middles will help us have an overall picture of middles and their syntactic and semantic features. This paper compares English and Chinese middle construction from cognitive perspectives and discusses their similarities and differences. It concludes that both English and Chinese middle construction have the typical properties of the construction in common. And Chinese middle construction has own its unique cognitive properties due to special syntactic and semantic rules of ‘hao+V’ construction. In ‘hao+V’ construction, auxiliary ‘hao’ is caused by the syntactic operation of extrapositon and tough movement, and lexicalization of the construction of ‘hao+V’ is still in its progress. Moreover, ‘NP+V+qilai+ADJ’ construction, patient-passive construction and ergative construction in Chinese, is also viewed as offering another cognitive mechanism in the result of the construal of scenes in the world, so they cannot be considered as middle construction.
Abstract
The middle construction is deeply cognitively motivated, which essence can only be captured from cognitive approach. Such a cognitive definition of middles will help us have an overall picture of middles and their syntactic and semantic features. This paper compares English and Chinese middle construction from cognitive perspectives and discusses their similarities and differences. It concludes that both English and Chinese middle construction have the typical properties of the construction in common. And Chinese middle construction has own its unique cognitive properties due to special syntactic and semantic rules of ‘hao+V’ construction. In ‘hao+V’ construction, auxiliary ‘hao’ is caused by the syntactic operation of extrapositon and tough movement, and lexicalization of the construction of ‘hao+V’ is still in its progress. Moreover, ‘NP+V+qilai+ADJ’ construction, patient-passive construction and ergative construction in Chinese, is also viewed as offering another cognitive mechanism in the result of the construal of scenes in the world, so they cannot be considered as middle construction.
참고문헌 (45)
- 古川裕, "現代漢語的“中動語態句式(middle construction)” - 語態變換的句法實現和 詞法實現", 漢語學報, (2), pp.22~32 (2005)
- 郭銳, "現代漢語詞類硏究" (2002), 商務印書館
- 紀小凌, "再論漢語的中間結構", 上海師範大學學報, (35), pp.123~130 (2006)
- 김경학, "수동태, 중간동사 및 능격동사 구문의 도식에 대해", 담화와 인지, 4(1), pp.45~59 (1997)
- 戴小春, "英､ 漢難易結構對比", 湖南第一師範學報, 2(1), pp.62~65 (2002)
- 맹춘영, "汉语的“难易”结构浅析 -以“NP+好V”为中心-", 중국어문학지, (30), pp.247~269 (2009), 중국어문학회
- 徐盛桓, "語義數量特徵與英語中動結構", 外語敎學與硏究, (6), pp.436~443 (2002)
- 楊素英, "從非賓格動詞現象看語義與句法結構之間的關係", 當代語言學, (1), pp.30~43 (1999)
- 熊仲儒, "“NP+好V”的句法分析", 當代語言學, (1), pp.63~72 (2011)
- 殷樹林, "“NP+(狀)+V起來+AP”格式與英語中動句的比較", 語言敎學與硏究, (1), pp.59~65 (2006)
- 이지현, "현대 중국어 ‘NPP+V起來+AP’형식 분석 ― 중간태 구문과의 비교를 중심으로", 중국어문학논집, (52), pp.109~130 (2008), 중국어문학연구회
- 이지현, "현대 중국어 피동 사건의 의미 구조 고찰", 중국어문학논집, (54), pp.127~142 (2009), 중국어문학연구회
- 이지현, "현대 중국어 타동성의 인지적 분석", 중국어문학논집, (55), pp.261~283 (2009), 중국어문학연구회
- 張定, "助動詞“好”的語法化及相關詞彙化現象", 語言敎學與硏究, (5), pp.31~38 (2009)
- 정태구, "논항구조와 영어 통사론" (2001), 한국문화사
- 曹宏, "論中動句的句法構造特點", 世界漢語敎學, (3), pp.38~48 (2004)
- 曹宏, "中動句的語用特點及敎學建議", 漢語學習, (5), pp.61~68 (2005)
- "中動句的範圍和結構-兼評曹宏的中動句硏究" (2006)[URL]
- 千昊載, "中國語의 中間構文", 東北亞細亞文化學會 第9回 國際學術大會, pp.66~71 (2004)
- 湯廷池, "漢語複合動詞的｢使動與起動交替｣", Language and Linguistics, 3(3), pp.615~644 (2002)
- 太田辰夫, "中國語歷史文法" (2005), 北京大學出版社
- 何文忠, "中動結構的認知闡釋", 박사, pp.2004
- 何文忠, "中動結構的界定", 外語敎學, 26(4), pp.9~14 (2005)
- 夏曉蓉, "英漢中間結構比較分析", 外語與外語敎學, (9), pp.36~38 (2005)
- Ackema, P, "The middle construction and syntax-semantics interface", Lingua, (93), pp.59~90 (1994)
- Burzio, "Italian Syntax, Dordrecht" (1986), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Cheng, L. -S., "Transitivity alternations in Mandarin Chinese", Proceedings of the Third Ohio State University Conference on Chinese Linguistics (1989)
- Chung, "On English Middle Formation", Studies in Generative Grammar, 6(2), pp.281~317 (1996)
- Declerck, "A Comprehensive Descriptive Grammar of English", Kaitakusha (1991)
- Fagan, "The English Middle", Linguistic Inquiry, (19.2), pp.181~203 (1988)
- Fawcett, R. P., "Cognitive Linguistics and Social Interaction: Towards an Integrated Model of a Systemic Functional Grammar and the Other Components of a Communicating Mind" (1980), Exeter and Heidelberg, Exter University Press and Groos Verlag
- Fellbaum, C., "On the Reflexive Middle in English", CLS, (25), pp.123~132 (1989)
- Iwata, S., "On the status of an implicit arguments in Middles", Journal of Linguistics, 35(3), pp.527~553 (1999)
- Kemmer, S., "The Middle Voice", John Benjamins (1993)
- Keyser, S. J, "On the middle and ergative construction in English", Linguistic Inquiry, 15(3), pp.381~416 (1984)
- Langacker, R., "Foundation of cognitive grammar", Stanford University, 2 (1991)
- Lyons, J., "Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics" (1969), Cambridge University Press
- Lekakou, M., "Middle Semantics in English and Greek", UCL working paper in linguistics, (14), pp.399~416 (2002)
- Massam, D., "Null Objects and Non-thematic Subjects", Journal of Linguistics, (28.1), pp.115~137 (1992)
- Perlmutter, "passives and unaccusative hypothesis", Berkeley Linguistic Society, (4), pp.157~189 (1978)
- Rapoport, T. R, "The English middle and agentivity", Linguistic Inquiry, (30), pp.147~155 (1999)
- Ting, Jen, "The Middle Construction in Mandarin Chinese and the Presyntactic Approach, Concentric", Studies in Linguistics, 32(1), pp.89~117 (2006)
- van Oosten, J., "The Nature of Subjects, Topics and Agents: A Cognitive Explanation" (1986), Indiana University Linguistic Club
- "코퍼스:國家語委語料庫査詢系統(Corpus Query System,CQS)"[URL]
- "北京大學中國語言學硏究中心(Center for Chinese Linguistics PKU,CCL)"[URL]