An Argumentative Approach to Korean -Cocha
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The conventional approach to Korean -cocha assumes that it triggers an existential presupposition and maintains that the prejacent is placed lower on the pragmatic scale of likelihood than the presupposed alternative proposition salient in the context. The current study finds that the alternative proposition is not reliably available in the contexts where the particle is used, especially those where it is contained in a negative statement denying a precondition of a contextually salient event. To handle these cases as well as other uses of the particle in a consistent manner, the paper proposes that the particle be treated as an argumentative operator, which marks the prejacent as a strong argument for a conclusion salient in the context.
Abstract
The conventional approach to Korean -cocha assumes that it triggers an existential presupposition and maintains that the prejacent is placed lower on the pragmatic scale of likelihood than the presupposed alternative proposition salient in the context. The current study finds that the alternative proposition is not reliably available in the contexts where the particle is used, especially those where it is contained in a negative statement denying a precondition of a contextually salient event. To handle these cases as well as other uses of the particle in a consistent manner, the paper proposes that the particle be treated as an argumentative operator, which marks the prejacent as a strong argument for a conclusion salient in the context.
참고문헌 (21)
- Anscombre, J.-C., "L’argumentation dans la Langue" (1983), Mardaga
- Choi, K., "Focus and Scope: On Korean Focus Particles Taman, Yeksi, Simcie, -Man, -To, -Kkaci", Mace, Textlinguistics, pp.1999, 6[DOI]
- Ducrot, O., "Les Échelles Argumentatives" (1980), Les Edítions de Minuit
- Francis, N. C., "Presuppositions in Focus", Ph. D., pp.2019
- Han, J. -H., "Scalar Meanings of the Korean Particles, -Mace, -Chocha, -Lato, -Na", Essays on the Korean Language and Literature, 20, pp.5~43 (2005)
- 한정한, "‘조차’, ‘까지’, ‘마저’의 텍스트 의미", 한글, (290), pp.231~263 (2010), 한글학회
- Horn, L. R., "Metalinguistic Negation and Pragmatic Ambiguity", Language, 61, pp.121~174 (1985)
- Horn, L. R., "Assertoric Inertia and NPI Licensing", Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: Parasession on Negation and Polarity, 38(2), pp.55~82 (2002)
- Huddleston, R., "The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language" (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Kay, P., "Even", Linguistics and Philosophy, 13(1), pp.59~111 (1990)
- Kim, K. -C., "The Comparison of English Particle Even with Korean Corresponding Particle -Kkaci, -Mace", Journal of Humanities, 7, pp.103~120 (1982)
- Ko, Y., "Semantic Analysis of Special Postpositions", Mwunpepyenkwu, 3, pp.7~21 (1976)
- König, E., "The Meaning of Focus Particles" (1991), Routledge
- Kripke, S., "Presupposition and Anaphora: Remarks on the Formulation of the Projection Problem", Linguistic Inquiry, 40(3), pp.367~386 (2009)
- Lee, C., "A Study on Modality Markers -Ya, -Cocha, and -Mace", Mwunchangemwunnoncip, 25, pp.199~222 (1988)
- Lee, K., "A Korean Grammar on Semantic-Pragmatic Principles" (1993), Hankookmunhwasa
- Lee, S., "Korean Postpositions and Suffixes", pp.279~298 (1995), Sekwanghakswulcalyosa
- Na, E.-Y., "A Semantic Analysis of -Kkaci, -Cocha, and -Mace", Hangugeohak(Korean Linguistics), 6, pp.211~226 (1997)
- Sung, K. C., "The Meanings of Korean Particles ‘-Kkaji’, ‘-Chocha’, ‘-Majo.’", Journal of Korean Language Education, 8, pp.49~72 (1997)
- 예선희, "‘좇다(follow)’를 어원으로 하는 용언과 보조사의 의미분화, 의미확장 및 의미오류 분석 —문법화의 관점에서", 신영어영문학, (51), pp.241~256 (2012), 신영어영문학회
- Yoon, J., "A Verification of Discourse Grammar Hypothesis on the Analysis of Semantic Function of Korean Particles -Kkaci, -Cocha, -Mace", KyungSung University Bulletin, 14(1), pp.7~22 (1993)