본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Pragmatics behind the Usage of -nun

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This study concerns the meaning generated from a particle –nun in Korean combined with a prosodic accent and the characteristic pragmatic behavior of the sentences containing it. In my previous research, I have argued that the alleged Topic marker –nun generates an existential presupposition of a contrastive alternative. In this paper, I will illustrate how the existential presupposition enables the utterances containing –nun obtain different felicity values from the canonical case marked ones in various pragmatic contexts. Speaker’s presupposition and common ground (Stalnaker1972, 1974) and accommodation (Lewis1979) will be adopted to explain the felicity differences between –nun and a case marker in the aspect of the amount of information obtained from the existential presupposition, not in the aspect of information structure differences.

Abstract

This study concerns the meaning generated from a particle –nun in Korean combined with a prosodic accent and the characteristic pragmatic behavior of the sentences containing it. In my previous research, I have argued that the alleged Topic marker –nun generates an existential presupposition of a contrastive alternative. In this paper, I will illustrate how the existential presupposition enables the utterances containing –nun obtain different felicity values from the canonical case marked ones in various pragmatic contexts. Speaker’s presupposition and common ground (Stalnaker1972, 1974) and accommodation (Lewis1979) will be adopted to explain the felicity differences between –nun and a case marker in the aspect of the amount of information obtained from the existential presupposition, not in the aspect of information structure differences.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. Bolinger. D, "Forms of English,In Accent, morpheme, order" (1965), Harvard University
  2. Büring, D, "Focus Linguistic, cognitive, and computational perspectives", pp.142~165 (1994), Cambridge University
  3. Büring,D, "The great scope inversion conspiracy", Linguistics & Philosophy, 20, pp.175~194 (1997)
  4. "What is presupposition accommodation? Unpublished manuscript, retrieved" (2000)[URL]
  5. Grice, H. P, "Syntax and semantics III: Speech acts" (1975), Academic
  6. Hamblin, C, "Questions in Montague English", Foundations of Language, 10, pp.41~53 (1973)
  7. Halliday, M, "Intonation and grammar in British English" (1967), Mouton
  8. Hara, Y, "Grammar of knowledge representation: Japanese discourse items at interfaces", 박사, pp.2006
  9. Horn,L, "On the semantic properties of logical operators in English", 박사, pp.1972
  10. Jackendoff,R, "Semantic interpretation in generative grammar" (1972), MIT
  11. Karttunen,L, "Syntax and semantics of questions", Linguistics and Philosophy, 1, pp.3~44 (1977)
  12. Krifka,M, "The notions of information structure", pp.13~54 (2007)
  13. Kim,J E, "The generation of implicit propositions in the alleged Korean topic", 박사, pp.2010
  14. pragmatics interface from different points of view, "The semantics", pp.1999, Lee, C M
  15. Lee, C M, "Contrastive topic and proposition structure" (2000), John Benjamins
  16. Lee, C M, "Contrastive (predicate) topic, intonation, and scalar meanings" (2003), Kluwer
  17. Lewis,D, "Scorekeeping in a language game" (1979), Springer
  18. Reinhart, T, "Pragmatics and linguistics,In An analysis of sentence topics", Philosophica, 27, pp.53~94 (1981)
  19. Rooth, M, "Association with focus", 박사, pp.1985
  20. Rooth,M, "A theory of focus interpretation", Natural Language Semantics, 1, pp.75~116 (1992)
  21. Stalnaker, R, "Semantics of Natural Language", pp.380~397 (1972), Reidel
  22. Stalnaker, R, "Semantics and Philosophy", pp.197~213 (1974), New York University
  23. Stalnaker, R, "On the representation of context", Journal of Logic, Language, and Information, 7, pp.3~19 (1998)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)