본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Translating Baihua Grammatical Elements in a Fifteenth-Century Korean Buddhist Text: Linguistic and Cultural Notes on the Mongsan hwasang pŏbŏ yangnok ŏnhae

Ito, Hideto
동아시아학술원 (The Academy of East Asian Studies)|2023.11|Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies|제23권 제2호|pp. 163-190|DOI 10.1215/15982661-10773068

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

baihuaMongsan hwasang pŏbŏ yangnokŏnhaehanmun hyŏnt'o glossingZen recorded sayings
주제분류학제간연구

초록

This article examines the fifteenth-century Korean ŏnhae 諺解 exegesis of the Mongsan hwasang pŏbŏ yangnok 蒙山和尙法語略錄 to determine the translation strategies used to render so-called baihua or vernacular Sinitic in vernacular Korean. In particular, the article aims first to clarify the linguistic features of the baihua materials from the late Southern Song period found in this text, and then to clarify the baihua comprehension and translation abilities of a fifteenth-century Buddhist intellectual who was not a trained specialist in spoken Chinese. It finds that, because Korean Buddhist temples were no longer bilingual Korean-Chinese spaces by early Chosŏn, and Korean Buddhist monks no longer had exposure to spoken Chinese, the Korean translator approached the baihua materials as if they were written in orthodox Literary Sinitic. As a result, he made a number of errors and mistranslations, especially when it came to translating vernacular Sinitic tense-aspect particles in vernacular Korean. The article concludes by briefly comparing and contrasting glossing strategies in Japan and Korea.

Abstract

This article examines the fifteenth-century Korean ŏnhae 諺解 exegesis of the Mongsan hwasang pŏbŏ yangnok 蒙山和尙法語略錄 to determine the translation strategies used to render so-called baihua or vernacular Sinitic in vernacular Korean. In particular, the article aims first to clarify the linguistic features of the baihua materials from the late Southern Song period found in this text, and then to clarify the baihua comprehension and translation abilities of a fifteenth-century Buddhist intellectual who was not a trained specialist in spoken Chinese. It finds that, because Korean Buddhist temples were no longer bilingual Korean-Chinese spaces by early Chosŏn, and Korean Buddhist monks no longer had exposure to spoken Chinese, the Korean translator approached the baihua materials as if they were written in orthodox Literary Sinitic. As a result, he made a number of errors and mistranslations, especially when it came to translating vernacular Sinitic tense-aspect particles in vernacular Korean. The article concludes by briefly comparing and contrasting glossing strategies in Japan and Korea.

참고문헌 (69)

  1. "ABL, ablative", ~
  2. "ACC, accusative", ~
  3. "ADNL, adnominal", ~
  4. "CLSF, classifier", ~
  5. "COND, conditional", ~
  6. "COP, copula", ~
  7. "CSC, complex stative construction", ~
  8. "CVB, converb", ~
  9. "DAT, dative", ~
  10. "DUR, durative", ~
  11. "EXCL, exclamatory", ~
  12. "EXPER, experiential", ~
  13. "FIN, finite", ~
  14. "FREQ, frequentative", ~
  15. "FUT, future", ~
  16. "GEN, genitive", ~
  17. "HON, honorific", ~
  18. "IMP, imperative", ~
  19. "INST, instrumental", ~
  20. "INTRG, interrogative", ~
  21. "LOC, locative", ~
  22. "NOM, nominative", ~
  23. "NZ, nominalizer", ~
  24. "PASS, passive", ~
  25. "PL, plural", ~
  26. "PREF, prefix", ~
  27. "PREP, preposition", ~
  28. "PRS, present", ~
  29. "SFP, sentence final particle", ~
  30. "SUF, suffix", ~
  31. "TOP, topic", ~
  32. "VOL, volitive", ~
  33. "VZ, verbalizer", ~
  34. Nihon Zuihitsu Taisei Henshūbu, "Nihon Zuihitsu Taisei" (1994), Yoshikawa Kōbunkan
  35. (1971), Gakushūin Tōyō Bunka Kenkyūjo
  36. "Mongsan hwasang pŏbŏ yangnok ŏnhae 蒙山和尙法語略錄諺解. Yunghŭi 2 (1908) copy", Komazawa Daigaku Library, ~ (1908)
  37. "Mongsan hwasang pŏbŏ yangnok ŏnhae" (1996), Hongmun’gak
  38. (1980), Asea Munhwasa
  39. Cao Guangshun, (1994), Shangwu yinshuguan
  40. Eda Toshio, (1977), Kokusho Kankōkai
  41. Fujiki Hisashi, (1995), Asahi shuppansha
  42. "Chōsengo kenkyū", 2004, 237~251, pp.Kuroshima Shuppan
  43. "Paper presented at the Daihakkai Higashi Ajia Shogengo Kenkyūkai 第八回東アジア諸言語研究会, Aoyama Gakuin Daigaku", 2004, ~
  44. Itō Hideto, "Corpus-Based Approaches to Sentence Structures", pp.33~49 (2005), John Benjamins
  45. "Tōkyō Gaikokugo Daigaku Ronshuu", 2008, 243~263
  46. "Paper presented at Che 2hoe Han-Il Han’guk Ŏnŏmunhwa Kukche Haksul Taehoe", 2011, ~, pp.Tōkyō Gaikokugo Daigaku
  47. "Paper presented at the 243rd meeting of the Chōsengo Kenkyūkai", 2015, ~, pp.Tokyo University
  48. "Chōsengo kenkyū", 2018, 151~189
  49. Kamata Shigeo, (1987), Tōkyō Daigaku Shuppan
  50. Li, Charles N., "Mandarin Chinese" (1981), University of California Press
  51. Liu Jian, (1992), Shangwu inshuguan 商務印書館: 新華書店北京發行所發行
  52. Martin, Samuel E., "A Reference Grammar of Korean" (1992), Tuttle
  53. Murai Shōsuke, (1995), Asahi Shuppansha
  54. "Chōsen gakuhō", 1963, 26~64
  55. Nishimura Eshin, (1994), Iwanami Shoten
  56. Ōta Tatsuo, (1987), Beijing daxue chubanshe
  57. Ōta Tatsuo, (1988), Hakuteisha
  59. Park, Si Nae, "The Sound of Learning the Confucian Classics in Chosŏn Korea", Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 79(1–2), pp.131~187 (2019)
  60. Saitō Mareshi, (2007), Nippon hōsō kyōkai
  61. "Kankoku Chōsen no bunka to shakai", 2012, 112~148
  63. Shimura Ryōji, (1984), Santōsha
  64. Song Shaonian, (2002), Wuhan Chubanshe
  66. Takata Tokio, (1988), Sōbunsha
  67. "Presented at Daihakkai Higashi Ajia Shogengo Kenkyūkai happyō kō 第八回東アジア諸言語研究会発表稿", 2004, ~, pp.Aoyama Gakuin Daigaku
  69. Yi Nŭnghwa, (1918), Sinmun’gwan

관련 논문AI추천

Inscriptional Repertoires and the Problem of Intra- versus Interlingual Translation in Traditional Korea로스 킹동아시아학술원 · Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies2023 · 제23권 제2호Vernacularization of Literary Sinitic in Early Modern Vietnam's Confucian Texts: A Study of the Annotations in the Tứ thư ước giải 四書約解루안쥔치앙동아시아학술원 · Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies2025 · 제25권 제2호Approaching Classical Chinese Poetry in Early Modern Japan: Intralingual and Interlingual Translation Strategies in Rikunyo's Remarks on PoetryFraleigh, Matthew동아시아학술원 · Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies2023 · 제23권 제2호Chinese-Korean Translation of the Discourse Marker '是(/si/)' in Buddhist Scriptures박윤철한국통번역교육학회 · 통번역교육연구2012 · 제10권 제2호A Comparison of the Translation Styles and Lexical Choices of Underwood and Gale in Two Korean Versions of Tŏkhye immun 德慧入門임다영한국학연구원 · Acta Koreana2024 · 제27권 제2호Turning Songs into Poems and Poems into Songs: Intersections of Literary Sinitic and Vernacular Korean in Chosŏn LiteratureChristina Han동아시아학술원 · Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies2021 · 제21권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

Editor's Introduction로스 킹pp. 115-117The Prose of Our Land: Ban Kōkei, Translation, and National Language Consciousness in Eighteenth-Century JapanClements, Rebekahpp. 119-136Approaching Classical Chinese Poetry in Early Modern Japan: Intralingual and Interlingual Translation Strategies in Rikunyo's Remarks on PoetryFraleigh, Matthewpp. 137-162Inscriptional Repertoires and the Problem of Intra- versus Interlingual Translation in Traditional Korea로스 킹pp. 191-210Vernacular Visions in North and South Korea: Interlingual Translations of Unyŏng chŏn (The Tale of Unyŏng) and Ideologies of National LiteraturePieper, Danielpp. 211-237
원문 보기