Approaching Classical Chinese Poetry in Early Modern Japan: Intralingual and Interlingual Translation Strategies in Rikunyo's Remarks on Poetry
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article examines Remarks on Poetry from Makuzugahara (Katsugen shiwa 葛原詩話, 1787, 1804), a Japanese reference work for Sinitic poets that comments on unusual vocabulary and subject matter mainly gathered from Tang and Song sources. Written by the Tendai Buddhist priest and celebrated Sinitic poet Rikunyo 六如 (1734–1801), Katsugen shiwa draws on both intralingual and interlingual translational techniques to engage with Sinitic texts and clarify their meaning to a Japanese readership. With intralingual techniques such as substitution, paraphrase, or expansion into more readily intelligible Sinitic, Rikunyo engaged in approaches identical to the Ming and Qing commentators whose annotations he referenced; his interlingual translation approaches included not only standard kundoku but explicit appeals to Japanese vernacular. The article shows in concrete terms how Rikunyo (as well as two other scholars who wrote fierce, point-by-point critiques of Katsugen shiwa) made use of these dual translation strategies.
Abstract
This article examines Remarks on Poetry from Makuzugahara (Katsugen shiwa 葛原詩話, 1787, 1804), a Japanese reference work for Sinitic poets that comments on unusual vocabulary and subject matter mainly gathered from Tang and Song sources. Written by the Tendai Buddhist priest and celebrated Sinitic poet Rikunyo 六如 (1734–1801), Katsugen shiwa draws on both intralingual and interlingual translational techniques to engage with Sinitic texts and clarify their meaning to a Japanese readership. With intralingual techniques such as substitution, paraphrase, or expansion into more readily intelligible Sinitic, Rikunyo engaged in approaches identical to the Ming and Qing commentators whose annotations he referenced; his interlingual translation approaches included not only standard kundoku but explicit appeals to Japanese vernacular. The article shows in concrete terms how Rikunyo (as well as two other scholars who wrote fierce, point-by-point critiques of Katsugen shiwa) made use of these dual translation strategies.
참고문헌 (24)
- Ban Kōkei, (1972), Heibonsha
- Denecke, Wiebke, "A Companion to Translation Studies", pp.204~216 (2014), Wiley
- Fraleigh, Matthew, "Rearranging the Figures on the Tapestry: What Japanese Direct Translation of European Texts Can Tell Us about kanbun kundoku", Japan Forum, 31(1), pp.4~32 (2019)
- Fujikawa Hideo, ". 20 vols" (1990), Kyūko shoin 汲古書院
- "1991", 28
- "Geibun kenkyū 藝文研究", 2022, 60~78
- Ikeda Shirōjirō, ". 10 vols" (1920), Bunkaidō
- Itō Tōgai, , Bunsendō
- Jakobson, Roman, "Language in Literature", pp.428~435 (1987), Harvard University Press
- Jovanović, Višnja, "Intra- and Interlingual Translation in Flux" (2023), Routledge
- Kornicki, Peter Francis, "Languages, Scripts, and Chinese Texts in East Asia" (2018), Oxford University Press
- Matsushita Tadashi, (1969), Meiji Shoin 明治書院
- Nagasawa Kikuya, ". 20 vols" (1972), Kyūko shoin
- Owen, Stephen, "The Poetry of Du Fu. 6 vols" (2016), de Gruyter
- Qiu Qiongshan, , Nagao Heibei
- Qiu Zhao’ao, , Dawentang
- Saussy, Haun, "The Making of Barbarians: Chinese Literature and Multilingual Asia" (2022), Princeton University Press
- Shimizu Shigeru, (1991), Iwanami shoten 岩波書店
- Terajima Ryōan, ", 18 vols" (1986), Heibonsha
- "Ochanomizu Joshi Daigaku Chūgoku bungaku kaihō お茶の水女子大学中国文学会報", 2006, 1~16
- Xie, Kai, "Hybridity, Visuality, and Play: Popular Linked Verse in Japanese and Chinese before the 1680s", Japanese Language and Literature, 50(2), pp.219~246 (2016)
- Yoshikawa Kōjirō, ". 7 vols" (1979), Kyūko shoin