본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한 중 분류사의 범주화 양상 대조 연구 - 1차원적 형상성(形狀性) 분류사를 중심으로 -

A Contrastive Study of Classifiers' Categorization Aspects Between Korean and Chinese: Focused on One-dimension Configurational Classifiers

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

The purpose of this study is to comparatively analyse one-dimension configurational classifiers' categorization aspects in Korean and Chinese and investigate the motivators of them. In Chapter 1, classifiers' concept and the need for investigating one-dimensional classifiers' categorization aspects of Korean and Chinese was addressed. In Chapter 2, the object words and method of this study was introduced. In Chapter 3 and 4, based on the usages, the categorization aspects of eight one-dimensional classifiers each in Korean and Chinese were investigated and contrasted. Macroscopically, both in Korean and Chinese, one-dimensional classifiers' categorization objects can be divided up into visible bounded entities, visible unbounded entities, and invisible objects. This similarity is caused by the prototype-based categorization cognitive mechanism shared by all human beings. The differences appear in some detailed aspects. They can be construed by cognitive tendencies and cultural experiences. In Chapter 5, the summary includes the discussion and the expectation for a follow-up study.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to comparatively analyse one-dimension configurational classifiers' categorization aspects in Korean and Chinese and investigate the motivators of them. In Chapter 1, classifiers' concept and the need for investigating one-dimensional classifiers' categorization aspects of Korean and Chinese was addressed. In Chapter 2, the object words and method of this study was introduced. In Chapter 3 and 4, based on the usages, the categorization aspects of eight one-dimensional classifiers each in Korean and Chinese were investigated and contrasted. Macroscopically, both in Korean and Chinese, one-dimensional classifiers' categorization objects can be divided up into visible bounded entities, visible unbounded entities, and invisible objects. This similarity is caused by the prototype-based categorization cognitive mechanism shared by all human beings. The differences appear in some detailed aspects. They can be construed by cognitive tendencies and cultural experiences. In Chapter 5, the summary includes the discussion and the expectation for a follow-up study.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. 김진수, "식물 분류사의 인지의미론적 고찰", 언어, 19, pp.99~114 (1998), 충남대학교 어학연구소
  2. 박정구, "유형론적 관점에서 본 중국어 분류사의 발전 및 그와 한국어의 관련성", 國語學, (63), pp.391~412 (2012), 국어학회[DOI]
  3. 서정범, "국어어원 사전" (2000), 보고사
  4. 우형식, "한국어 분류사의 범주화 기능 연구" (2001), 박이정
  5. 우형식, "형상성 분류사의 범주화 분석", 외대어문론집, 16, pp.37~61 (2001), 부산외국어대학교어문학연구소
  6. 이연화, "한국어 수분류사의 의미 분석", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.2000
  7. 이종은, "한국어 수분류사의 의미 분석", 석사, pp.1996
  8. 임지룡, "의미범주의 원형탐색에 관한 연구", 국어교육연구, 25, pp.115~151 (1993), 국어교육연구회
  9. 임지룡, "인지의미론" (1997), 탑출판사
  10. 임지룡, "의미의 인지언어학적 탐색" (2008), 한국문화사
  11. 張美蘭, "한·중 형상성 분류사의 범주 확장에 대한 대조 연구", 박사, 국어국문학과 국어학전공, pp.2014
  12. 정경재, "분류사 ‘점(點)’이 수량화하는 범주의통시적 변화", Journal of korean Culture, 16, pp.1~25 (2011), 한국어문학국제학술포럼
  13. 정경재, "분류사 '자루'가 수량화하는 범주의 변화", 우리어문연구, (41), pp.259~293 (2011), 우리어문학회
  14. 채완, "국어 분류사의 기능과 의미", 진단학보, 70, pp.167~180 (1990), 진단학회
  15. 최재영, "한ㆍ중 1, 2, 3차원 형상성 분류사 小考", 언어와언어학, (40), pp.125~152 (2007), 언어연구소
  16. 郭秋雯, "한국어 分類詞 연구", 박사, 국어학, pp.1997
  17. 秦麗鳳, "유형론적 관점에서 본 한국어 분류사 연구", 박사, 국어국문학과 국어학전공, pp.2012
  18. 步連增, "語言類型學視野下的漢語量詞硏究", 博士, pp.2011
  19. 藥中元, "現代漢語一名多量現象", 碩士, pp.2003
  20. 郭敏, "基干認知語言學的現代漢語形狀量詞詞義考察", 碩士, pp.2006
  21. 郝曉慶, "類型學框架下的現代漢語分類量詞語義硏究", 碩士, pp.2008
  22. 惠紅軍, "漢語量詞硏究", 博士, pp.2009
  23. 季計偉, "論量詞“根”的形成与其認知語義的多向發展", 語文硏究, 116, pp.34~38 (2010)
  24. 劉世儒, "魏晉南北朝量詞硏究" (1965), 中華書局
  25. 孟繁杰, "量詞“條”的産生及歷史演變", 宁夏大學學報(人文社會科學版), 31, pp.35~40 (2009)
  26. 石毓智, "表物体形狀的量詞的認知基础", 語言敎學与硏究, (1), pp.34~41 (2001)
  27. 姚双元, "漢語空間義量詞考察", 湖南師范大學社會科學學報, 31, pp.107~112 (2002)
  28. 張赪, "類型學視野的漢語名量詞演變史" (2012), 北京大學出版社
  29. 朱曉軍, "認知語言學視角下的漢語个体量詞塔配-以“條”爲例", 語言与翻譯(漢文), 88, pp.30~32 (2006)
  30. 宗守云, "量詞范疇化的途徑和動因", 上海師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版), 40, pp.109~116 (2011)
  31. 宗守云, "認知范的原則共相与細節殊相-以漢語量詞“條”和日語量詞 “本”的异同爲例", 修辭學習, 164, pp.50~56 (2011)
  32. 宗守云, "漢語量詞的認知硏究" (2012), 世界圖書出版公司
  33. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., "Classifies: A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices" (2000), Oxford University Press
  34. Evans, V., "인지언어학 기초" (2008), 한국문화사
  35. K. Allan, "Classifiers", Language, 53(2), pp.285~311 (1977)
  36. Kovecses, Z., "언어·마음·문화의 인지언어학적 탐색" (2010), 역락
  37. Lakoff, G., "Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind" (1987), The University of Chicago Press
  38. Sang-ryong Oh, "Korean Numeral Classifiers: Semantics and Universals" (1994), Thaehaksa

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)