본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

원형이론에서의 한국어 한자어 접사와 중국어 사철 대조 연구

Comparative study of Korean hanja affixes and Chinese affixes from the standpoint of prototype theory

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Korean hanja affixes and Chinese affixes play several roles and often belong to different categories, thus limiting the possibility of categorization. In order to overcome these limitations, this study investigates whether the prototype theory, a cognitive linguistics theory widely used in numerous domains, can be employed. First, I examine the Korean and Chinese affixes and their particularities. Then, I review the existing literature and show the problems caused by the classical theory of categorization and, in order to solve these problems, I consider the prototype theory and its particularities. After that, I analyze the specificities of the prototypical categorization of both hanja and Chinese affixes. By doing so, I demonstrate that the prototype theory can be used successfully. Hanja affixes, historically represented as derivatives, are affected by other categories’ factors; they are connected to other linguistic factors from other categories. In other words, Chinese characters were used in the Korean vocabulary system as independent nouns or dependent word root; however, as time passed and circumstances evolved, their usage expanded and they acquired an affix function. The prototype theory originates in the critic of Aristoteles’ classical theory of categorization used in linguistics and philosophy. The categorization of hanja affixes and Chinese affixes have problems such as the ‘indetermination of the categorization’, ‘blurriness of categories’ limits’, ‘hierarchy of terms within a category’, and using the prototype theory can help when making categorization. Consequently, the prototype theory is more relevant than the classical approach.

Abstract

Korean hanja affixes and Chinese affixes play several roles and often belong to different categories, thus limiting the possibility of categorization. In order to overcome these limitations, this study investigates whether the prototype theory, a cognitive linguistics theory widely used in numerous domains, can be employed. First, I examine the Korean and Chinese affixes and their particularities. Then, I review the existing literature and show the problems caused by the classical theory of categorization and, in order to solve these problems, I consider the prototype theory and its particularities. After that, I analyze the specificities of the prototypical categorization of both hanja and Chinese affixes. By doing so, I demonstrate that the prototype theory can be used successfully. Hanja affixes, historically represented as derivatives, are affected by other categories’ factors; they are connected to other linguistic factors from other categories. In other words, Chinese characters were used in the Korean vocabulary system as independent nouns or dependent word root; however, as time passed and circumstances evolved, their usage expanded and they acquired an affix function. The prototype theory originates in the critic of Aristoteles’ classical theory of categorization used in linguistics and philosophy. The categorization of hanja affixes and Chinese affixes have problems such as the ‘indetermination of the categorization’, ‘blurriness of categories’ limits’, ‘hierarchy of terms within a category’, and using the prototype theory can help when making categorization. Consequently, the prototype theory is more relevant than the classical approach.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. 구본관, "한국어 문법 총론Ⅰ" (2015), 집문당
  2. 김규철, "한자어 단어 형성에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.1980
  3. 김창섭, "접두사의 사전적 처리", 새국어생활, 8, pp.5~22 (1998), 국립국어연구원
  4. 盧明姬, "漢子語의 語彙形態論的 特性에 관한 연구", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.1990
  5. 노명희, "현대국어 한자어 연구" (2005), 태학사
  6. 박영순, "한국어 은유 연구" (2000), 고려대 출판부
  7. 方香玉, "한국 한자어와 중국어의 파생어 대조 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2011
  8. 오수경, "고등학교 중국어 교과서에 나타난 2음절 합성어에 관한 학습과 교수법 연구", 석사, 중국어교육, pp.2006
  9. 이현희, "국어 접사 범주에 관한 연구 : 접사와 인접 범주 간의 관계를 중심으로", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2006
  10. 임지룡, "원형 이론과 의미 범주화", 국어학, 23, pp.41~68 (1993), 국어학회
  11. 임지룡, "인지의미론" (1997), 탑출판사
  12. 조암, "韓國語 漢字語接頭辭 範疇의 再確立", 어문연구(語文硏究), 43(1), pp.37~62 (2015), 한국어문교육연구회[DOI]
  13. 조 암, "조선어 한자어접사의 형음의의 대응관계 연구", 중국조선어문, 3, pp.32~38 (2017), 길림성민족사무위원회
  14. 조 암, "한국어 한자어접미사의 범주 설정 기준에 대하여", 한국(조선)어교육연구, 12, pp.121~138 (2017), 중국한국(조선)어교육연구학회
  15. 崔圭一, "韓國語 語彙形成에 관한 硏究", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1989
  16. 최윤지, "자립명사로 발달하는 한자어 파생접미사에 대하여", 형태론, 10(2), pp.319~333 (2008), 형태론
  17. 馬慶株, "現代漢語詞綴的性質、範圍和分類", 中國語言學報, 6, pp.218~229 (1995), 中國語言學會
  18. 蘇寶榮, "漢語複合詞結構義對構詞語素意義的影響", 語文研究, 1, pp.1~4 (2013), 華中師範大學
  19. 王珏, "現代漢語名詞研究" (2001), 上海華東師範大學出版社
  20. 呂叔湘, "漢語語法分析問題" (1979), 北京商務印書館
  21. 劉月華, "實用現代漢語語法" (2001), 北京商務印書館
  22. 尹海良, "现代汉语类词缀研究", 박사, pp.2007
  23. 任學良, "漢語造詞法" (1981), 中國社會科學出版社
  24. 趙元任, "語口語語法" (1979), 北京商務印書館
  25. 曹炜, "現代漢語詞彙研究" (2003), 北京大學出版社
  26. 陳光磊, "汉语词法论" (1994), 上海学林出版社
  27. 湯志祥, "當代漢語詞語的共時狀況及其嬗變" (2001), 上海複旦大學出版社
  28. 胡習之, "現代漢語詞綴研究鳥瞰", 阜陽師院學報, 1, pp.106~111 (1991), 阜陽師范學院

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)