추론 검증 과정 연구
A Study on Inference Verification Process
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to illuminate what inference verification is and how such process is performed. To this end, this study looks at the concept of verification process during the inference process. Inference verification process is a process that readers present new reasons and grounds for an inference result or increases the validity of inference through counterargument and refutation. This process has differentiality, which is different from the checking and evaluating process in the existing inference process in that it is a process to persuade readers very actively for an inference result. This inference verification is based on critical thinking in that it verifies and evaluates validity for an inference result. Inference verification is a process thinking that moves in the better direction in that it continues to improve inference results with new reasons and grounds and that it reinterprets texts and presents new solutions to a problem and reveals the characteristics of critical thinking as creative reproductive process well. If inference verification is a positive persuasion process for an inference, it takes a form of argument. The type of inference verification depends on counterargument awareness. Inference verification without counterargument awareness takes not only a form that adds new reasons and grounds to inference result but also a form of ‘inference elaboration’ that presents the information related to the existing inference in more detail and of ‘inference expansion’ that makes the contents of inference much richer. Inference verification without counterargument awareness may increase the validity of inference by contradicting the counterargument recognized or modify or discard inference if you cannot contradict. Korean Language Education has emphasized the importance of inference, but few researches on the instructional methods designed for a valid inference have been performed. For readers to do a valid inference, further studies seem to be necessary because inference verification process is a process that requires a higher level of thought and educational contents related to this shall have to be provided with readers
Abstract
This study aims to illuminate what inference verification is and how such process is performed. To this end, this study looks at the concept of verification process during the inference process. Inference verification process is a process that readers present new reasons and grounds for an inference result or increases the validity of inference through counterargument and refutation. This process has differentiality, which is different from the checking and evaluating process in the existing inference process in that it is a process to persuade readers very actively for an inference result. This inference verification is based on critical thinking in that it verifies and evaluates validity for an inference result. Inference verification is a process thinking that moves in the better direction in that it continues to improve inference results with new reasons and grounds and that it reinterprets texts and presents new solutions to a problem and reveals the characteristics of critical thinking as creative reproductive process well. If inference verification is a positive persuasion process for an inference, it takes a form of argument. The type of inference verification depends on counterargument awareness. Inference verification without counterargument awareness takes not only a form that adds new reasons and grounds to inference result but also a form of ‘inference elaboration’ that presents the information related to the existing inference in more detail and of ‘inference expansion’ that makes the contents of inference much richer. Inference verification without counterargument awareness may increase the validity of inference by contradicting the counterargument recognized or modify or discard inference if you cannot contradict. Korean Language Education has emphasized the importance of inference, but few researches on the instructional methods designed for a valid inference have been performed. For readers to do a valid inference, further studies seem to be necessary because inference verification process is a process that requires a higher level of thought and educational contents related to this shall have to be provided with readers.
참고문헌 (21)
- 교육부, "국어과 교육과정(교육부 고시 제2015-74호)", ~ (2015)
- 김수철, "정당화 지도를 위한 수업 모형 개발 : 중학교 기하 영역을 중심으로", 박사, 교과교육학과 수학교육학전공, pp.2013
- 김영정, "비판적 사고의 9요소와 9기준", 대한토목학회지, 11, pp.217~225 (2005), 대한 토목학회
- 김영채, "사고와 문제 해결 심리학" (1995), 박영사
- 김현미, "초·중학생의 설득적 글에 반영된 논증 구조 및 논증 도식 연구", 박사, 국어교육학과, pp.2014
- 김혜정, "텍스트 이해의 과정과 전략에 관한 연구 : '비판적 읽기' 이론 정립을 위한 학제적 접근", 박사, 국어교육학, pp.2002
- 문정미, "초등학생의 추론적 읽기 양상 연구", 박사, 국어교육학과, pp.2014
- 박만엽, "비판적 사고와 논증 분석-‘발표와 토론’을 중심으로-", 사고와표현, 4(1), pp.63~102 (2011), 한국사고와표현학회[DOI]
- 박수자, "추론적 읽기 지도의 내용 연구", 국어교육, (120), pp.169~200 (2006), 한국어교육학회
- 박완서, "자전거 도둑" (1999), 다림
- 박준호, "논증의 종류와 평가의 기준 -비판적 사고와 비형식 논리학의 의의-", 범한철학, 42(3), pp.273~296 (2006), 범한철학회
- 서혁, "언어 사용과 추론", 한국국어교육연구회, 56, pp.15~46 (1995), 한국어교육학회
- 윤준채, "비판적 사고력 측정을 위한 읽기 평가의 방향", 독서연구, (20), pp.83~110 (2008), 한국독서학회
- 이삼형, "텍스트언어학의 응용 : 텍스트의 이해와 추론", 텍스트언어학, 7, pp.315~338 (1999), 한국텍스트언어학회
- 이숭원, "국어1,2" (2015), 좋은책 신사고
- 서울대 국어교육연구소, "국어교육학사전" (1999), 대교출판
- 송숙희, "비판적 사고에 의한 추론 전략 훈련", 교육심리연구, 9, pp.131~148 (1995), 한국교육심리학회
- 홍병선, "‘비판적 사고’가 갖는 철학적 함의", 철학논총, 66(4), pp.453~473 (2011), 새한철학회
- Kintsch, W., "이해 : 인지 패러다임" (2010), 나남출판사
- Toulmin, S. E., "논변의 사용" (2006), 고려대학교출판부
- Williams, J., "논증의 탄생" (2008), 홍문관
