2015개정 읽기/독서 교육과정의 내적 논리와 몇 가지 쟁점들
Theoretical Foundation and Issues of the Reading Curriculum in Korean Language Education
2
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
A purpose on this paper is to study and to describe theoretical foundation and issues of the reading curriculum and optional subject-reading curriculum during the high school times in Korean language education. First, in this paper, we explain what this reading and inner logic that make up the reading curriculum. Second, what was at issue in this part of the revised reading curriculum is explained. Further, a few of suggestions for the direction of reading curriculum and reading education in future is explored. According to the revised curriculum in 2015, but the attempt to implement a core competency it did not show a specific application, and the framework of curriculum still reveals features of skill. In addition, some changes in high school elective subjects, but, high school’s curriculum was organized on the skill-based major areas in deepening subjects. Lots of meaningful contents related to reader’s identity or the psychological attitude is deleted under the needs of education policy. Therefore, the future curriculum design, it will be able to provide meaningful experiences awaken human potential and the fulfillment of criteria which can establish their identity as readers should be strengthened.
Abstract
A purpose on this paper is to study and to describe theoretical foundation and issues of the reading curriculum and optional subject-reading curriculum during the high school times in Korean language education. First, in this paper, we explain what this reading and inner logic that make up the reading curriculum. Second, what was at issue in this part of the revised reading curriculum is explained. Further, a few of suggestions for the direction of reading curriculum and reading education in future is explored. According to the revised curriculum in 2015, but the attempt to implement a core competency it did not show a specific application, and the framework of curriculum still reveals features of skill. In addition, some changes in high school elective subjects, but, high school’s curriculum was organized on the skill-based major areas in deepening subjects. Lots of meaningful contents related to reader’s identity or the psychological attitude is deleted under the needs of education policy. Therefore, the future curriculum design, it will be able to provide meaningful experiences awaken human potential and the fulfillment of criteria which can establish their identity as readers should be strengthened.
참고문헌 (17)
- J. Bruner, "교육의 문화" (2014), 교육과학사
- 김상욱, "독자들의 반란-대안문학이 왜 필요한가?", 독서연구, (2), pp.201~237 (1997), 한국독서학회
- 2015개정 교과 교육과정 시안개발 연구, "김창원", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구보고, CRC2015-25-3 (2015)
- 박영목, "학습 사회와 독서", 독서연구, pp.89~122 (1996), 한국독서학회
- 손영애, "국어과 교육과정에서 ‘내용 체계’ 의 위상에 관한 小論", 국어교육, (137), pp.295~326 (2012), 한국어교육학회
- 신헌재, "독서교육의 이론과 방법" (1993), 서광출판사
- 미래 사회 대비 국가 수준 교육과정 방향 탐색-국어, "서영진", 한국교육과정평가원, 125~138 (2013)
- Allan C. Ornstein, "교육과정: 기초, 원리, 쟁점(Curriculum : Foundations, Principles, and Issues)", pp.390~391 (2007), 학지사
- 추연구, "과정 중심 교수의 접근 고찰", 특수교육저널:이론과 실천, 4(3), pp.87~108 (2003), 한국특수교육문제연구소
- 한철우, "과정 중심 독서지도" (2001), 교학사
- 한철우, "문학 중심 독서지도" (2002), 대한교과서
- 한철우, "거시적 독서지도" (2011), 역락
- Fish, S., "Is There a Text in This Class? The Autbority of Interpretative Communities" (1980), Harvard University Press
- Gaffney J., "Handbook of reading research, vol. Ⅲ", pp.53~75 (2000), LEA
- Harrison, C., "Handbook of reading research, vol. Ⅲ" (2000), LEA
- Hruby, G. G, "Sociological, Postmodern, and new realism perspectives in social constructionism:implication for literacy research", Reading Research Quartely, 36(1) (2001), IRA
- Ruddell, M. R., "Teaching Content: Reading and Writing" (2001), John Wiley and Sons Inc