충분한 문법 학습 경험을 갖지 못한 중등 예비 국어 교사의 문법 개념화 양상 분석 연구를 위한 시론
An Analytic Study on Grammar Conceptualization Aspect of Secondary Pre service Korean Language Teachers with Insufficient Grammar Learning Experience
0
조회
0
다운로드
24
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study attempts to discuss the issue of grammar conceptualization process by extracting grammar knowledge inherent in learners. This consciousness is based on the two dimensions of ‘understanding’ and ‘expression’ in which learners acquire and extract grammatical knowledge, and it can be said to be the focus of the ‘expression dimension.’ That is to say, while previous studies have paid attention to learner’s misconceptions in the dimension of ‘understanding grammar knowledge,’ this study has focused on the issue of learner’s conceptualization process in the ‘expression dimension of grammar knowledge.’ In other words, this study attempted to employ as the subjects of the study those learners who have established the grammatical concept properly by passing the level of misconceptions in grammar learning that cannot express properly. On the subjects of secondary pre‐service Korean language teachers, who are most suitable for this learner type as the study subjects, this study attempted to mainly focus on exploring the issues such as how to characterize the contours of ‘grammatical concepts or terms' and ‘linguistic phenomena,’ and how to conceptualize the object by adjusting the perspective to a certain extent in their acquisition of grammatical meaning, how to arrange concepts, and whether to show proper way of structuring the conceptualization process of concept speakers as to ‘grammatical concepts and terminology’ and the ‘linguistic phenomena’ in their conceptualization process on the subject. For this, in chapter 3, this study presented some cases of analysis of conceptualization of ‘word class conversion’ by classifying the grammar conceptualization process of secondary pre ‐service Korean language teachers into convergence and divergence, to explore the possibility of analyzing the aspects, suggesting that there is a need to pay attention to the issue of learner's conceptualization aspects. And in chapter 4, this study tried to find a way of grammar terms dictionary composition in terms of searching for deep understanding of individual grammar items or terms’ as a method to contribute to the conceptualization process of the secondary pre service Korean language teachers, and find ‘a way to present a conceptual structure diagram in terms of searching the possibility of linkage between grammatical items or concepts.’ The discussion above has fundamental limitations in that it focuses on some cases of secondary pre‐service Korean language teachers. However, this study is meaningful in that it suggests the possibility of exploration by dividing methods of contributing to the conceptualization process into ‘a search dimension for deep understanding of individual grammatical items or terms' and ‘a search dimension for the possibility of linking between grammatical items or concepts' while it raises the need for attention on the learner's conceptualization aspect of grammar, and examines the possibility of learner's grammar conceptualization aspect analysis research.
Abstract
This study attempts to discuss the issue of grammar conceptualization process by extracting grammar knowledge inherent in learners. This consciousness is based on the two dimensions of ‘understanding’ and ‘expression’ in which learners acquire and extract grammatical knowledge, and it can be said to be the focus of the ‘expression dimension.’ That is to say, while previous studies have paid attention to learner’s misconceptions in the dimension of ‘understanding grammar knowledge,’ this study has focused on the issue of learner’s conceptualization process in the ‘expression dimension of grammar knowledge.’ In other words, this study attempted to employ as the subjects of the study those learners who have established the grammatical concept properly by passing the level of misconceptions in grammar learning that cannot express properly. On the subjects of secondary pre‐service Korean language teachers, who are most suitable for this learner type as the study subjects, this study attempted to mainly focus on exploring the issues such as how to characterize the contours of ‘grammatical concepts or terms' and ‘linguistic phenomena,’ and how to conceptualize the object by adjusting the perspective to a certain extent in their acquisition of grammatical meaning, how to arrange concepts, and whether to show proper way of structuring the conceptualization process of concept speakers as to ‘grammatical concepts and terminology’ and the ‘linguistic phenomena’ in their conceptualization process on the subject. For this, in chapter 3, this study presented some cases of analysis of conceptualization of ‘word class conversion’ by classifying the grammar conceptualization process of secondary pre ‐service Korean language teachers into convergence and divergence, to explore the possibility of analyzing the aspects, suggesting that there is a need to pay attention to the issue of learner's conceptualization aspects. And in chapter 4, this study tried to find a way of grammar terms dictionary composition in terms of searching for deep understanding of individual grammar items or terms’ as a method to contribute to the conceptualization process of the secondary pre service Korean language teachers, and find ‘a way to present a conceptual structure diagram in terms of searching the possibility of linkage between grammatical items or concepts.’ The discussion above has fundamental limitations in that it focuses on some cases of secondary pre‐service Korean language teachers. However, this study is meaningful in that it suggests the possibility of exploration by dividing methods of contributing to the conceptualization process into ‘a search dimension for deep understanding of individual grammatical items or terms' and ‘a search dimension for the possibility of linking between grammatical items or concepts' while it raises the need for attention on the learner's conceptualization aspect of grammar, and examines the possibility of learner's grammar conceptualization aspect analysis research.
참고문헌 (29)
- 구본관, "한국어 문법 총론Ⅰ" (2015), 집문당
- 구본관, "원리 중심의 문법 교육에 대한 연구", 국어교육연구, (27), pp.261~297 (2011), 국어교육연구소
- 김기혁, "언어유형론-형태론과 통사론-" (2009), 보고사
- 김은성, "이야기를 활용한 문법 교육 가능성 탐색", 국어교육, (122), pp.353~383 (2007), 한국어교육학회
- 김종도, "인지 문법의 타동성 모형", 어문집, 14, pp.15~34 (1995), 수원대학교
- 김종도, "타동성에 관한 문법이론의 견해들", 어문집, 13, pp.39~55 (1995), 수원대학교
- 김호정, "국어과 오개념 연구 방향 탐색", 새국어교육, (83), pp.211~238 (2009), 한국국어교육학회
- 남가영, "메타언어적 활동에 대한 국어교육적 연구: 소집단 고쳐쓰기 활동을 중심으로", 석사, 국어교육, pp.2003
- 남기심, "표준국어문법론" (2011), 탑출판사
- 남승호, "한국어 이동 동사의 의미 구조와 논항교체", 어학연구, 39(1), pp.111~145 (2003), 서울대학교 어학연구소
- 2007, , ~
- 민현식, "‘부사성’의 문법적 의미", 한국어 의미학, 10, pp.227~250 (2002), 한국어의미학회
- 민현식, "統合的 文法 敎育의 意義와 方向", 문법 교육, 12, pp.1~37 (2010), 한국문법교육학회
- 박종훈, "텍스트의 기능적 분석과 그 국어교육적 의미 -동성(transitivity)을 중심으로-", 국어교육학연구, (33), pp.427~448 (2008), 국어교육학회
- 양정석, "개념의미론의 의미구조 기술과 논항 연결: 이동동사?움직임 동사 구문을 중심으로", 언어, 29(3), pp.329~358 (2004), 한국언어학회
- 연재훈, "타동성의 정의를 위한 원형이론적 접근", 언어, 22(1), pp.107~132 (1997), 한국언어학회
- 오현아, "사용자 중심의 문법 기술을 위한 문법 교육 내용 재구조화 방안 모색", 어문학보, 36, pp.27~52 (2016), 강원대학교 국어교육과
- 오현아, "통사 구조 중심의 ‘서술어의 자릿수’ 개념 관련 문법 교육 내용 재구조화 방안 모색", 국어교육, (155), pp.1~28 (2016), 한국어교육학회
- 이관희, "문법 교사의 오개념 유형화 연구", 새국어교육, (102), pp.107~152 (2015), 한국국어교육학회[DOI]
- 이수련, "개념화와 의미 해석" (2015), 박문사
- 이선웅, "한국어 문법론의 개념어 연구" (2012), 월인
- 이윤주, "사례개념화 원리와 실제" (2007), 학지사
- 임지룡, "인지언어학 키워드 사전" (2004), 한국문화사
- 조진수, "형태소의 ‘자립성’과 ‘의존성’에 대한 학습자의 오개념 연구", 문법 교육, 21, pp.269~306 (2014), 한국문법교육학회
- 조진수, "‘타동성’의 문법 교육적 위상 정립을 위한 시론", 국어국문학, (174), pp.71~97 (2016), 국어국문학회
- D. Alan Cruse, "인지언어학" (2007), 박이정
- Halliday, M. A. K., "An Introduction to Functional Grammar" (2004), Hodder Arnold
- Hopper, P. J., "Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse", Language, 56(2), pp.251~299 (1980)
- Jae, J. S., "언어유형론-형태론과 통사론-" (2009), 보고사
