중한 목적어 구문의 어순대조
A Comparative Analysis of the Object sentences Word Order in Chinese and Korean
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
According to this thesis, the errors made in the translation of Chinese object sentences mainly due to the differences between the word order of Chinese and Korean object sentences. Thus, the present paper contrasted the word order of Chinese and Korean object sentences in respect of syntax, semantics and information structure. In the aspect of syntax, Korean object sentences were divided into prototype object sentences and shift object sentences, and they were contrasted with their Chinese equivalent structures: predicate-object clauses and Ba-sentences. As was viewed from the aspect of semantics, the Animacy theory was adopted to analyze how the animacy of object influenced the word order of Chinese and Korean object sentences. In respect of information structure, the differences of expressing the new information and the old one between Chinese and Korean object sentences were analyzed in detail.
Abstract
According to this thesis, the errors made in the translation of Chinese object sentences mainly due to the differences between the word order of Chinese and Korean object sentences. Thus, the present paper contrasted the word order of Chinese and Korean object sentences in respect of syntax, semantics and information structure. In the aspect of syntax, Korean object sentences were divided into prototype object sentences and shift object sentences, and they were contrasted with their Chinese equivalent structures: predicate-object clauses and Ba-sentences. As was viewed from the aspect of semantics, the Animacy theory was adopted to analyze how the animacy of object influenced the word order of Chinese and Korean object sentences. In respect of information structure, the differences of expressing the new information and the old one between Chinese and Korean object sentences were analyzed in detail.
참고문헌 (15)
- 목정수, "한국어 문법론", pp.9~24 (2003), 월인
- 박동열, "한국어 격 실현에 관한 연구 - 프랑스어 격 실현과 비교 연구 -", 프랑스어문교육, (17), pp.167~189 (2004), 한국프랑스어문교육학회
- 우순조, "한국어의 형성과 관계표지의 실현양상", 박사, 언어학과, pp.1994
- 우형식, "국어타동구문의 연구", pp.90~163 (1996), 박이정
- 菜春玉, "基于对比的朝汉双宾语结构习得研究", 석사, pp.2007
- 曹秀玲, "对朝鲜语为母语的学生汉语宾补共现句习得研究", 延边大学学报, 31, pp.35~41 (2000)
- 崔承一, "汉语述补(结果)宾谓语句在朝鲜语中的对应形式", 延边大学学报, 2, pp.33~39 (1991)
- 崔健, "朝汉范畴表达对比", pp.193~194 (2002), 中国大百科全书出版社
- 黄玉花, "朝汉述宾结构对比", 박사, pp.2004
- 陆丙甫, "从宾语标记来看语言类型学的功能分析", 当代语言学, 4, pp.253~263 (2001)
- 柳英绿, "朝汉语语法对比", pp.88~138 (1999), 延边大学出版
- 柳英绿, "朝汉翻译基础", pp.185~194 (2002), 延边大学出版
- 金英实, "非受事‘把’字句同韩国语相关范畴对比", 解放军外语学院学报, 3, pp.29~34 (2007)
- 金忠实, "중국인 학습자를 위한 한국어 ‘를’구문 교수방법연구", 박사, pp.2008
- 周 红, "现代汉语致使范畴研究", 박사, pp.2007