본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A study of peer feedback patterns in CMC modes on Korean EFL students

0

조회

0

다운로드

18

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류영어와문학

초록

Abstract

This study explores the differences between EFL students' peer feedback patterns using two different CMC modes, synchronous mode (chatting) and asynchronous mode (bulletin board) in Korean EFL writing classes. After writing the first draft of an argumentative essay, 20 participants received their feedback by bulletin board and 18 received theirs through chatting. Participants' attitudes towards peer feedback using either chatting or bulletin board were investigated through the questionnaire. Peer feedback editing texts of chatting and bulletin board were quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed. The results show that the participants who were grouped in the bulletin board class provided larger amount of peer feedback than the chatting class in terms of frequency. Various peer feedback patterns were identified to indicate the clear distinction from the chatting and the bulletin board. As for the questionnaire, most participants found peer feedback useful regardless of using either chatting or bulletin boards. The findings of this study support that both CMC tools helped the need and effectiveness of peer feedback in EFL writing environment.

참고문헌 (85)

  1. I, "The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German", pp.157~167 (2003)
  2. Althaus, "Computer-mediated communication in the university classroom An experiment with on-line discussions Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association" (1996)
  3. Ashwell, "Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language Writing", pp.227~257 (2000)
  4. & Eledge, "Student attitudes toward computer-mediated communication in the language classroom", pp.27~45 (1996)
  5. Bloch, "Implementing CommonSpace in the ESL composition classroom Perspectives on L2 reading-writing connections University of Michigan Press", pp.309~334 (2001)
  6. "Networked computers in ESL writing classes", pp.45~58 (1997)
  7. LAN, "A study of English as a foreign language writers on a local-area network and in traditional classes", pp.275~292 (2001)
  8. Cho, "The effectiveness of peer feedback in Korean EFL writing classrooms", pp.33~59 (2005)
  9. Chun, "Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence", pp.17~31 (1994)
  10. DiGiovanni, "An alternative to face to face? ELT Journal", pp.263~272 (2001)
  11. DiMatteo, "An anti-instrumentalist view of network writing", pp.5~19 (1991)
  12. Han, "The effective use of CMC tools in teaching English as a foreign language", pp.243~264 (2003)
  13. & Lefkowitz, "Feedback on feedback Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing Journal of Second Language Writing", pp.141~163 (1994)
  14. Jun, "The effects of web-based feedback types on college students' English writing abilities and attitudes", pp.179~202 (2005)
  15. Keh, "Feedback in the writing process A model and methods for implementation", pp.294~304 (1990)
  16. Kern, "Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production", pp.457~476 (1995)
  17. Kim, "The effects and social aspects of peer response in weblogs on returnee's writing using the Social Network Analysis", pp.141~168 (2005)
  18. Lee, "Using web-based bulletin board for peer correction in EFL basic writing classes", pp.147~164 (2002)
  19. Lee, "Teaching writing using a bulletin board on the Internet", pp.171~191 (2000)
  20. I, "Coaching from the margins Issues in written response Research insights for the classroom", pp.57~68 (1990), Cambridge University Press
  21. Liu, "Peer review with the instructor Seeking alternatives in ESL writing Teaching in action Case studies from second language classrooms", pp.237~240 (1998)
  22. Liu, "Peer response in second language writing classrooms University of Michigan Press" (2002)
  23. Liu, "The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing Journal of English for Academic Purposes"
  24. Lockhart, "Analyzing talk in peer response groups", pp.605~655 (1995)
  25. MacLeod, "Computer-aided peer review of writing", pp.87~94 (1999)
  26. "Peer reviews in the ESL composition classroom", pp.274~284 (1992)
  27. O, "Revision activities in ESL writing instruction", pp.745~769 (1994)
  28. Moon, "The nature of peer revisions in an EFL writing class of a Korean university", pp.119~140 (2000)
  29. Park, "Peer-revision in web-based English writing", pp.107~126 (2004)
  30. Pennington, "The impact of the computer in second language writing Exploring the dynamics of second language writing", pp.287~310 (2003), Cambridge University Press
  31. English Language, "Korean EFL university students' evaluation of peer review interactions A social model for evaluating the writing process", pp.51~66 (2005)
  32. Reid, "Responding to ESL students' texts The myths of appropriation", pp.273~292 (1994)
  33. "A theoretical foundation for the development of pedagogical tasks in computer mediated communication", pp.5~34 (1996)
  34. , english, pp.2001[DOI]
  35. Tsui, "Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of Second Language Writing", pp.147~170 (2000)
  36. "The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course", pp.217~235 (2004)
  37. Van der Geest, "The computer as means of communication for peer-review groups", pp.237~250 (1994)
  38. "Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom", pp.7~26 (1996)
  39. Yagelski, "The role of classroom context in the revision strategies of student writers Research in the Teaching of English", pp.216~238 (1995)
  40. Zhang, "Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class Journal of Second Language Writing", pp.209~222 (1995)
  41. A fewer for less the for hte Corrections on bibliographic format, , 1995, ~
  42. Abrams, Z. I, "The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German", 87, pp.157~167 (2003)
  43. Althaus, S, "Computer-mediated communication in the university classroom: An experiment with on-line discussions" (1996), San Francisco, CA
  44. Ashwell, T, "Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method?", 9, pp.227~257 (2000)
  45. Beauvois, M. H.,, "Personality types and megabytes: Student attitudes toward computer-mediated communication in the language classroom", 13, pp.27~45 (1996)
  46. Bloch, J.,, "Implementing CommonSpace in the ESL composition classroom", pp.309~334 (2001), Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press
  47. Braine, G, "Beyond word processing: Networked computers in ESL writing classes", 14, pp.45~58 (1997)
  48. Braine. G, "A study of English as a foreign language (EFL) writers on a local-area network (LAN) and in traditional classes", 18, pp.275~292 (2001)
  49. Cho, Y. K, "The effectiveness of peer feedback in Korean EFL writing classrooms", 17, pp.33~59 (2005)
  50. Chun, D, "Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence", pp.17~31 (1994)
  51. DiGiovanni, E.,, "Online peer review : An alternative to face to face?", 55, pp.263~272 (2001)
  52. DiMatteo, A, "Communication, writing, learning: An anti-instrumentalist view of network writing", pp.5~19 (1991)
  53. Han, Jong-Im, "The effective use of CMC tools in teaching English as a foreign language", 6(2), pp.243~264 (2003)
  54. Hedgcock, J, "Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing", pp.141~163 (1994)
  55. Hyland, K, "Second language writing" (2003), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  56. Jun, J. Y, "The effects of web-based feedback types on college students' English writing abilities and attitudes", 11(1), pp.179~202 (2005)
  57. Keh, C. L, "Feedback in the writing process: A model and methods for implementation", pp.294~304 (1990)
  58. Kern, R, "Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production", 79, pp.457~476 (1995)
  59. Kim, J. K, "The effects and social aspects of peer response in weblogs on returnee's writing using the Social Network Analysis (SNA) approach", 8(1), pp.141~168 (2005)
  60. Lee, E. K, "Using web-based bulletin board for peer correction in EFL basic writing classes", 9(4), pp.147~164 (2002)
  61. Lee, S. Y, "Teaching writing using a bulletin board on the Internet: A preliminary study", 55(3), pp.171~191 (2000)
  62. Leki, I, "Coaching from the margins: Issues in written response", pp.57~68 (1990), Cambridge University Press.
  63. Liu, J, "Peer review with the instructor: Seeking alternatives in ESL writing", pp.237~240 (1998), Alexandria, VA: TESOL
  64. Liu, J.,, "Peer response in second language writing classrooms" (2002), Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press
  65. Liu, J.,, "The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing", 2, pp.193~227 (2003)
  66. Lockhart, C.,, "Analyzing talk in peer response groups: Stances, functions, and content", 45, pp.605~655 (1995)
  67. MacLeod, L, "Computer-aided peer review of writing", 62(3), pp.87~94 (1999)
  68. Mangelsdorf, K, "Peer reviews in the ESL composition classroom: What do the students think", pp.274~284 (1992)
  69. Mendona, C. O, "Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction", pp.745~769 (1994)
  70. Moon, Y. I, "The nature of peer revisions in an EFL writing class of a Korean university", 55(1), pp.119~140 (2000)
  71. Moran, C, "We write, but do we read? Computers and Composition", pp.51~61 (1991)
  72. Park, E. Y, "Peer-revision in web-based English writing", 10(1), pp.107~126 (2004)
  73. Pennington, M. C, "The impact of the computer in second language writing", pp.287~310 (2003), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  74. Prochaska, E, "Korean EFL university students' evaluation of peer review interactions: A social model for evaluating the writing process", 11(2), pp.51~66 (2005)
  75. Reid, J, "Responding to ESL students' texts: The myths of appropriation", pp.273~292 (1994)
  76. Salaberry, M. R, "A theoretical foundation for the development of pedagogical tasks in computer mediated communication", 14, pp.5~34 (1996)
  77. Skinner, B.,, "Computer conferencing: Does it motivate EFL students?", 53, pp.270~280 (1999)
  78. Tannacito, T, "Teaching professional writing online with electronic peer response", 6(2) (2001)
  79. Tsui, A.,, "Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?", 9, pp.147~170 (2000)
  80. Tuzi, F, "The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course", 21, pp.217~235 (2004)
  81. Van der Geest, T, "The computer as means of communication for peer-review groups", pp.237~250 (1994)
  82. Warschauer, M, "Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom", 13, pp.7~26 (1996)
  83. Warshauer. M, "Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice", 81, pp.470~481 (1997)
  84. Yagelski, R, "The role of classroom context in the revision strategies of student writers", 29, pp.216~238 (1995)
  85. Zhang, S, "Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class", 4, pp.209~222 (1995)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)