Implementation and Perception of Online Peer Feedback by Korean EFL Students
2
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examines the areas and types of feedback Korean EFL students would focus on in online peer feedback sessions and their implementation and perception of online peer feedback. Fifteen students in a two-month-long TOEFL beginner class participated in the study. They were asked to make comments on their peers' writings on the online blog after class. Most of their comments were found in the local area. In the local area the greatest frequency was observed in alternation while suggestion was the most frequently occurred in the global area. Similarly, more revisions were made in the local area than in the global area. Most of the comments which pointed out grammatical or lexical errors were implemented in their final drafts. Their perceptions of online peer feedback were investigated through interviews. In general, they found online peer feedback beneficial for the improvement of their writing abilities, but simultaneously they hesitated to give and receive peer feedback because of the possibility of incorrectness.
Abstract
This study examines the areas and types of feedback Korean EFL students would focus on in online peer feedback sessions and their implementation and perception of online peer feedback. Fifteen students in a two-month-long TOEFL beginner class participated in the study. They were asked to make comments on their peers' writings on the online blog after class. Most of their comments were found in the local area. In the local area the greatest frequency was observed in alternation while suggestion was the most frequently occurred in the global area. Similarly, more revisions were made in the local area than in the global area. Most of the comments which pointed out grammatical or lexical errors were implemented in their final drafts. Their perceptions of online peer feedback were investigated through interviews. In general, they found online peer feedback beneficial for the improvement of their writing abilities, but simultaneously they hesitated to give and receive peer feedback because of the possibility of incorrectness.
참고문헌 (40)
- Allaei, S, "Exploring the dynamics of cross-cultural collaboration", Writing Instructor, 10(1), pp.19~28 (1990)
- Berg,E.C, "The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality", Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), pp.215~241 (1999)
- Brick,J, "China: A Handbook in Intercultural Communication" (2004), National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research MacQuarie University
- Carson, J, "Chinese students’perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction", Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(1), pp.1~19 (1996)
- Chaudron,C, "The effects of feedback on students’ composition revisions", Journal, 15(2), pp.1~6 (1984)
- Connor, U, "Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: how much impact on revision", Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(3), pp.257~276 (1994)
- Diab,N.M, "Effects of peer- versus self-editing on students’ revision of language errors in revised drafts", System, 38(1), pp.85~95 (2010)
- DiGiovanni, E, "Online peer review: an alternative to face-to-face", ELT Journal, 55(3), pp.23~34 (2001)
- DiPardo, A, "Peer response groups in the writing classroom: theoretic foundations and new directions", Review of Educational Research, 58(2), pp.119~149 (1988)
- Guardado, M, "ESL students' experiences of online peer feedback", Computers and Composition, 24(4), pp.443~462 (2007)
- Hansen, J, "Guiding principles for effective peer response", ELT Journal, 59(1), pp.31~38 (2005)
- Hu,G, "Potential cultural resistance to pedagogical imports: The case of communicative language teaching in China", Language. Culture and Curriculum, 15(2), pp.93~105 (2002)
- Hyland,K, "Providing productive feedback", ELT Journal, 44(4), pp.279~285 (1990)
- Jones, R. H, "Interactional dynamics in on-line and face-to-face peer-tutoring sessions for second language writers", Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(1), pp.1~23 (2006)
- Keh,C.L, "Feedback in the writing process: a model and methods for implementation", ELT Journal, 44(4), pp.294~304 (1990)
- Lee,I, "Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms", Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(3), pp.144~164 (2008)
- London, M, "Maximizing the Value of 360-degree Feedback" (1998), Center for Creative Leadership
- Lundstrom, K, "To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(1), pp.30~43 (2009)
- Mangelsdorf,K, "Peer reviews in the ESL composition classroom: what do the students think", ELT Journal, 46(3), pp.274~284 (1992)
- Mangelsdorf, K, "ESL student response stances in a peer-review task", Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(3), pp.235~254 (1992)
- Mendonςa, C. O, "Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction", TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), pp.745~769 (1994)
- Mittan,R, "The peer review process: Harnessing students’ communicative power, In Richness in Writing: Empowering ESL Students" (1989), Longman
- Paulus,T.M, "The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), pp.265~289 (1999)
- Reid,J, "Responding to ESL students’texts: The myths of appropriation", TESOL Quarterly, 28(2), pp.273~292 (1994)
- Rollinson,P, "Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class", ELT Journal, 59(1), pp.23~30 (2005)
- Saito, H, "Characteristics and user acceptance of peer rating in EFL writing classrooms", Language Teaching Research, 8(1), pp.31~54 (2004)
- Schmid, M, "The effects of speaker accent and target predictability on perception of mispronunciation", Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42(1), pp.56~64 (1999)
- Selfe, C, "Letter from the editor", Computers and Composition, 9(2), pp.3~5 (1992)
- Stanley,J, "Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators", Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(3), pp.217~233 (1992)
- Sullivan, N, "A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: A computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom", System, 24(4), pp.491~501 (1996)
- Susser,P, "Process approaches in ESL", EFL writing instruction, 1994, pp.3(1), 31~47
- Tseng, S, "On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course", Computers and Education, 49(4), pp.1161~1174 (2007)
- Tseng, S, "Taiwan college students' self-efficacy and motivation of learning in online peer assessment environments", The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3), pp.164~169 (2010)
- Tsui, A. B. M, "Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments", Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), pp.147~170 (2000)
- Villamil, O. S, "Peer revision in the L2 lassroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior", Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(1), pp.51~75 (1996)
- Warschauer, M, "Computer learning networks and student empowerment", System, 24(1), pp.1~14 (1996)
- Wolcott,H.F, "Transforming Qualitative Data: Description, Analysis, and Interpretation" (1994), Sage Publications
- Yang, M, "A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class", Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), pp.179~200 (2006)
- 유호정, "The Dynamics of a Peer Response Group in a Mixed-Level Korean EFL Writing Class", 영어학연구, 17(1), pp.187~212 (2011), 한국영어학학회
- Zhang,S, "Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class", Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(3), pp.209~222 (1995)
