본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Peer Feedback Interactions in EFL Compositions: Written Feedback versus Oral Feedback

0

조회

0

다운로드

22

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류영어와문학

초록

Abstract

The aim of the paper was to investigate the effectiveness of two different types of peer feedback activities (i.e., peer review sessions and writing conferences) in process- oriented EFL compositions. To this end, a study was conducted in which subjects were six college students, and data were collected via questionnaire and journal writing. During the first half of semester, subjects engaged in peer review sessions in which they worked in pairs to exchange written feedback by responding to items on a peer-review sheet. For the rest of semester, subjects participated in writing conferences in which each subject received oral feedback by reading his/her draft aloud to the rest of course members, and gaining suggestions or comments on it. Drafts were revised on the basis of written feedback and oral feedback, respectively, and were scored analytically. Meanwhile, to determine subjects’ perception of two differing types of peer feedback, data from questionnaire and journal writing were also analyzed. Among the findings, most important, though both types of peer feedback activities played a facilitative role in improving writing attitude and writing skill by triggering the changes in various parts of L2 writing processes, writing conferences were more effective in assuming such a role than peer review sessions. It was concluded that peer feedback activities, especially writing conferences would be an appropriate, effective tool to promote and enhance students’ writing interest and writing ability in light of the very complicated nature of L2 writing which usually lowers motivation, and weakens confidence in writing in EFL compositions.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. "Practical tips for implementing peer editing tasks in the foreign language classroom", 36(3), pp.434~441 (2003)
  2. "The effects of feedback on students composition revisions", 15, pp.1~14 (1984)
  3. "Assessing language ability in the classroom" (1994)
  4. "Verbal reports as a source of insights into second language learner strategies", 7, pp.5~24 (1996)
  5. "Feedback on compositions Research insights for the classroom", pp.155~177 (1990), Cambridge University Press
  6. "From product to process - introspective methods in second language research Introspection in second language research", pp.5~23 (1987), In C
  7. "Teacher response to student writing Focus on form versus content Research insights for the classroom", pp.178~190 (1990), Cambridge University Press
  8. "Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms", 29(1), pp.33~53 (1995)
  9. "Writer-based prose: A cognitive basis for problems in writing. Writing in a second language: Insights from first and second language teaching and research", pp.62~80 (1996)
  10. "Classroom-based evaluation in second language education" (1996), New York: Cambridge University Press
  11. "Student input and negotiation of meaning in ESL writing conferences", pp.443~460 (1990)
  12. "Student input and negotiation of meaning in ESL Writing conferences. Writing in a second language: Insights from first and second language teaching and research", pp.173~186 (1996)
  13. "Collaborative oral", aural revision in foreign language writing instruction Journal of Second Language Writing, 1992, 255~276
  14. "Judgments of error gravities", 31, pp.116~124 (1977)
  15. "Errors in language learning and use: Exploring error analysis" (1998)
  16. "Reducing composition errors:An experiment", 66, pp.140~149 (1982)
  17. "Its always more difficult than you plan and imagine: Teachers perceived difficulties in introducing the communicative approach in South Korea", 32(4), pp.677~703 (1998)
  18. "Analyzing talk in ESL peer response groups", 45, pp.605~655 (1995)
  19. "Peer reviews in the ESL composition classroom", pp.274~284 (1992)
  20. "Case study research in education" (1988), Jossey-Bass
  21. "International Review of Applied Linguistics", pp.177~188 (1993)
  22. "Using written teacher feedback in EFL composition classes", 54(1), pp.47~53 (2000)
  23. "ESL students perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups", 7(2), pp.113~131 (1998)
  24. "A textbook for teachers" (1995)
  25. "Teaching language in context(3rd ed.)" (2001)
  26. "A study on peer feedback revision in web-based EFL compositions. Proceedings of the 2004 ETAK Summer Conference", pp.126~129 (2004), Inha University Incheon
  27. "Errors of English speakers of German as perceived and evaluated by German natives", pp.253~261 (1978)
  28. "Where to draw the red line: Error toleration of native and non-native EFL faculty", 32(4), pp.426~434 (1999)
  29. "The effects of cultural schemata on reading processing strategies", 25(4), pp.273~295 (1990)
  30. "Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality", pp.83~95 (1986)
  31. "Peer evaluation: I am not the teacher", 52(1), pp.19~28 (1998)
  32. "Effects of prewriting discussions on adult ESL students compositions", 7, pp.319~345 (1998)
  33. "The place of grammar in English composition", 54(1), pp.67~93 (1999)
  34. "Taking advantage of conference-centered writing", 22, pp.1~5 (1988)
  35. "Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators. Writing in a second language: Insights from first and second language teaching and research", pp.81~94 (1996)
  36. "Studies in Second Language Acquisition"
  37. "EFL business writing behaviors in differing feedback environments", 50(4), pp.573~616 (2000)
  38. "Recent research on writing pedagogy", 21(4), pp.697~715 (1987)
  39. "Responding to student writing. Writing in a second language: Insights from first and second language teaching and research", pp.155~172 (1996)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)