Effects of Online Peer Feedback Using CMC Instrument
1
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The present study examines whether the use of CMC tools in peer feedback can be effective in the writing improvement of EFL learners. 52 university students have been selected to participate in this current study. The participants were divided into two classes, and each class was assigned to peer feedback groups. Instructions on the writing task and the peer feedback training were thoroughly explained. The participants in both classes wrote their first draft and provided feedback to their group members using the bulletin board. Then, one class revised the final version after getting the feedback through only bulletin board (BBO); another class received feedback through chatting (BBC) after the bulletin board feedback, and then, revised the final version. The first drafts and the final versions of the essays were analyzed holistically and analytically. The statistical results indicated that there were significant differences in the writing improvement in each class, BBO and BBC class. However, no statistical difference was found between the BBO class and the BBC class although the mean score of the BBC class was slightly higher than that of the BBO class. Additionally, the participants’ questionnaire revealed that the use of chatting after the bulletin board peer feedback was extremely helpful in understanding the peer feedback.
Abstract
The present study examines whether the use of CMC tools in peer feedback can be effective in the writing improvement of EFL learners. 52 university students have been selected to participate in this current study. The participants were divided into two classes, and each class was assigned to peer feedback groups. Instructions on the writing task and the peer feedback training were thoroughly explained. The participants in both classes wrote their first draft and provided feedback to their group members using the bulletin board. Then, one class revised the final version after getting the feedback through only bulletin board (BBO); another class received feedback through chatting (BBC) after the bulletin board feedback, and then, revised the final version. The first drafts and the final versions of the essays were analyzed holistically and analytically. The statistical results indicated that there were significant differences in the writing improvement in each class, BBO and BBC class. However, no statistical difference was found between the BBO class and the BBC class although the mean score of the BBC class was slightly higher than that of the BBO class. Additionally, the participants’ questionnaire revealed that the use of chatting after the bulletin board peer feedback was extremely helpful in understanding the peer feedback.
참고문헌 (45)
- Almeida d’Eça,T, "To chat or not to chat in the EFL classroom, that is the question", Paper presented at the Language-Communication Culture International Conference (2002)
- Bacha,N, "Writing evaluation: What can analytic versus holistic essay scoring tell us?", System, 29, pp.371~383 (2001)
- Belcher,D, "Authentic interaction in a virtual classroom: Leveling the playing field in a graduate seminar", Computers and Composition, 16, pp.253~267 (1999)
- Braine,G, "Beyond word processing: Networked computers in ESL writing classes", Computers and Composition, 14, pp.45~58 (1997)
- Bruffe,K.A, "Collaborative learning and the “conversation of mankind.”", College English, 46(7), pp.635~652 (1984)
- Cha,Yoon-Jung, "Effects of synchronous and asynchronous peer feedback on Korean EFL learners’ writing", 박사, pp.2007
- Chun,D.M, "Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence", System, 22, pp.17~31 (1994)
- Cohen,A.D, "Assessing language ability in the classroom" (1994), Heinle & Heinle
- Cooper, M. M, "Computer conferences and learning: Authority, resistance, and internally persuasive discourse", College English, 52(8), pp.847~869 (1990)
- Daedalus integrated writing environment, "InterChange (Version 3.6)" (1994), Daedalus Group
- DiGiovanni, E, "Online peer review: An alternative to face to face?", ELT Journal, 55, pp.263~272 (2001)
- Egbert, J, "Computer-enhanced language learning environments: An overview. In:CALL environments", pp.1~16 (1999), TESOL
- Ferris, D. R, "Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice" (1998), Lawrence Erlbaum
- Forse, K. S, "Great essay (2nd ed.)" (2004), Houghton Mifflin.
- Guardado, M, "ESL students’ experiences of online peer feedback", Computers and Composition,, 24, pp.443~361 (2007)
- Hansen, J. G, "Guiding principles for effective peer response", ELT Journal, 59(1), pp.31~38 (2005)
- Harris,L.D, "The Internet-based composition classroom: A study in pedagogy", Computers and Composition, 13, pp.353~371 (1996)
- Hewett,B.L, "Characteristics of interactive oral and computer-mediated peer group talk and its influence on revision", Computers and Composition, 17, pp.265~288 (2000)
- Ho, M. C, "Face-to face and computer mediated peer review in EFL writing", CALICO Journal, 24, pp.269~290 (2007)
- Hyland,K, "Second language writing" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- 전재영, "웹기반 피드백 유형이 대학생들의 영작문 능력과태도에 미치는 영향", 영어어문교육, 11(1), pp.179~202 (2005), 한국영어어문교육학회
- Jung,Yang-Soo, "A study on the instructional design for the effective use of the Internet and its impacts on English language writing", Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 5(2), pp.130~155 (2002)
- Kim,Choong-Il, "A study of interaction in a CALL-based and process-based writing instruction", English Language Teaching, 17(4), pp.203~227 (2005)
- Lane, J, "Writing clearly: An editing guide (2nd ed.)" (1999), Heinle & Heinle
- Lee,Eui-Kap, "Using web-based bulletin board for peer correction in EFL basic writing classes", Foreign Languages Education, 9(4), pp.147~164 (2002)
- Lee,So-Young, "Teaching writing using a bulletin board on the Internet: A preliminary study", English Teaching, 55(3), pp.171~191 (2000)
- Liu, J, "The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2, pp.193~227 (2003)
- Liu, J, "Peer response in second language writing classrooms" (2002), The University Michigan Press
- Lockhart, C, "Analyzing talk in peer response groups: Stances, functions, and content", Language Learning, 45, pp.605~655 (1995)
- Min,H.T, "Training students to become successful peer reviewers", System, 33, pp.293~308 (2005)
- Min,H.T, "The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality", Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, pp.118~141 (2006)
- Nelson, G. L, "Peer response groups: Do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts?", TESOL Quarterly, 27, pp.135~141 (1993)
- Reid,J, "Responding to ESL students’ texts: The myths of appropriation", TESOL Quarterly, 28, pp.273~292 (1994)
- Smith,B, "Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model", The Modern Language Journal, 87, pp.38~57 (2003)
- Sotillo,S.M, "Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication", Language Learning and Technology, 4, pp.82~119 (2000)
- Strenski, E, "Email small group peer review revisited", Computers and Composition, 22, pp.191~208 (2005)
- Suh,Jae-Suk, "Effectiveness of CALL writing instruction: The voices of Korean EFL learners", Foreign Language Annals, 35(6), pp.669~679 (2002)
- Sullivan, N, "A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: A computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom", System, 29(4), pp.491~501 (1996)
- Sutton,L.A, "The principle of vicarious interaction in computer-mediated communications", International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7(3), pp.223~242 (2001)
- Tannacito, T, "A comparison of e-response: Two experiences, one conclusion", Kairos, 7(3) (2002)
- Tuzi,F, "The impact of e-feedback on the revision of L2 writers in an academic writing course", Computers and Composition, 21, pp.217~235 (2004)
- Villamil, O, "Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior", Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, pp.51~75 (1996)
- Vygotsky,L.S, "Thought and language" (1962), MIT Press.
- Vygotsky,L.S, "Mind and society" (1978), Harvard University Press
- Warschauer,M, "Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom", CALICO journal, 13, pp.7~26 (1996)