본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

戦後の在日コリアン政策を通して見る 日本の「多文化共生」イデオロギー -教育政策と市民運動を中心に-

The "Tabunka-kyousei" ideology examined through a postwar Korean policy in Japan - mainly put a viewpoint on an education policy and a civic movement -

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

The concept of "multiple cultures" did not exist in postwar Japan, but the "international understanding" which gives priority to its race had substituted for the ideology. Those days most foreigners were Koreans in Japan, and the policy to them was an "assimilation policy." and assimilation was "kyosei" ideology containing the meaning of "parasitism." The 90s in Japan, although newcomers increased in number, but the governmental plan was "Japanesization" of them. It was only extension of the "assimilation policy" to a Korean in Japan. The Japanese government began to use the word "tabunka-kyosei" under such circumstances. However, even if it used the word "tabunka-kyosei", it is extension of an "assimilation policy" and there was no change in the meaning of "parasitism" being contained. Furthermore, the civic movement in connection with a newcomer advanced activity which assists with a governmental policy, without considering "tabunka-kyosei" ideology deeply. The 1980s, only the Korean educational movement in Japan put the ideology "mutualism", and promoted the movement. However, now it can concluded that the movement will also be controlled by the "tabunka-kyosei" ideology containing the meaning of "parasitism" .

Abstract

The concept of "multiple cultures" did not exist in postwar Japan, but the "international understanding" which gives priority to its race had substituted for the ideology. Those days most foreigners were Koreans in Japan, and the policy to them was an "assimilation policy." and assimilation was "kyosei" ideology containing the meaning of "parasitism." The 90s in Japan, although newcomers increased in number, but the governmental plan was "Japanesization" of them. It was only extension of the "assimilation policy" to a Korean in Japan. The Japanese government began to use the word "tabunka-kyosei" under such circumstances. However, even if it used the word "tabunka-kyosei", it is extension of an "assimilation policy" and there was no change in the meaning of "parasitism" being contained. Furthermore, the civic movement in connection with a newcomer advanced activity which assists with a governmental policy, without considering "tabunka-kyosei" ideology deeply. The 1980s, only the Korean educational movement in Japan put the ideology "mutualism", and promoted the movement. However, now it can concluded that the movement will also be controlled by the "tabunka-kyosei" ideology containing the meaning of "parasitism" .

참고문헌 (9)

  1. 石井敏, "多文化社会日本の課題", pp.261~ (2011), 明石書店
  2. 岡本耕平, "中部圏の多文化共生先進圏づくり―多文化共生をめぐるいくつかのキーワードと日本の状況", 中部圏研究, pp.3~ (2010), 名古屋大学環境学研究科
  3. 佐藤郡衛, "国際理解教育", pp.22~ (2001), 明石書店
  4. 朴鐘碩他, "日本における多文化共生とは何か", pp.75~ (2008), 新曜社
  5. 福岡安則, "差別と共生の社会学", pp.233~ (1996), 岩波書店
  6. 宮島喬, "『多文化共生』の問題と課題", pp.11~13 (2009), 学術の動向
  7. 村井忠政, "共生をめぐる若干の疑問−共生概念の再検討の試み−", 多文化共生年報, (創刊), pp.3~ (2003)
  8. 八杉龍一, "岩波生物学辞典 第4版", pp.319~ (1996), 岩波書店
  9. 米田伸次, "テキスト国際理解", pp.48~ (1997), 国土社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (39건)