「モヨウダ」と「모양이다」の日韓対照研究
The Contrastive Study on moyoda in Japanese and moyangita in Korean
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The aim of this paper is to compare and contrast moyoda in Japanese with moyangita in Korean, focusing on the discourse situation and the discourse attitude, the degree of modality. Analysis results are as follows. (1) With reference to the discourse situation, moyoda in Japanese is mainly used in the situation of ‘public report’, whereas moyangita in Korean is used in the situation of ‘report non-public as well as public’. (2) In regard to the discourse attitude, moyoda in Japanese is mainly used in the manner of ‘objective report’. However moyangita in Korean is used in the manner of ‘report subjecitve as well as objective’. (3) moyoda in Japanese almost takes no past tense and no interrogation, no negation. But moyangita in Korean can take past tense easily and limited interrogation, no negation. As a result, the degree of modality in the former is high, whereas the degree of modality in the latter is not as high as the former.
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to compare and contrast moyoda in Japanese with moyangita in Korean, focusing on the discourse situation and the discourse attitude, the degree of modality. Analysis results are as follows. (1) With reference to the discourse situation, moyoda in Japanese is mainly used in the situation of ‘public report’, whereas moyangita in Korean is used in the situation of ‘report non-public as well as public’. (2) In regard to the discourse attitude, moyoda in Japanese is mainly used in the manner of ‘objective report’. However moyangita in Korean is used in the manner of ‘report subjecitve as well as objective’. (3) moyoda in Japanese almost takes no past tense and no interrogation, no negation. But moyangita in Korean can take past tense easily and limited interrogation, no negation. As a result, the degree of modality in the former is high, whereas the degree of modality in the latter is not as high as the former.
참고문헌 (29)
- 강소영, "명사구 보문 구성의 문법화", pp.74~86 (2004), 한국문화사
- 김지은, "우리말 양태용언 구문 연구", pp.174~200 (1998), 한국문화사
- 안정아, "‘것’, ‘터’, ‘모양’의 양태어미 연구", 어문논집, 47, pp.105~128 (2002), 민족어문학회
- 안주호, "한국어 교육과 양태표현", pp.191~219 (2012), 한국문화사
- 이기종, "우리말의 인지론적 분석", pp.174~200 (2001), 역락
- 佐藤琢三, "｢模様｣の報告用法について", 国語学, 219, pp.73~84 (2004), 日本語学会
- 佐藤琢三, "自動詞文と他動詞文の意味論", pp.67~81 (2005), 笠間書院
- 新屋映子, "“文末名詞”について", 国語学, 159, pp.75~88 (1989), 日本語学会
- 仁田義雄, "日本語のモダリティと人称", pp.17~74 (1991), ひつじ書房
- 益岡隆志, "命題の文法", pp.5~57 (1987), くろしお出版
- 益岡隆志, "モダリティの文法", pp.17~59 (1991), くろしお出版
- 益岡隆志, "主題の対照", pp.3~17 (2004), くろしお出版
- 益岡隆志, "叙述類型論", pp.3~18 (2008), くろしお出版
- 文彰鶴, "｢モヨウダ｣と｢모양이다｣に関する日韓対照研究-発話状況とモダリティの真正度を中心に-", 韓国日語教育学会2014年度第25回国際学術大会, pp.133~137 (2014), 韓国日語教育学会
- 文彰鶴, "日本語の｢モヨウダ｣と韓国語の｢모양이다｣について-意味用法を中心に-", 韓国日本言語文化学会2014年度春季国際学術大会및招請講演会発表論文集, pp.119~123 (2014), 韓国日本言語文化学会
- 野田尚史, "日本語のモダリティ", pp.131~157 (1989), くろしお出版
- 松村明, "大辞林, 第三版" (2006), 三省堂
- 이기문, "동아 새국어 사전, 제5판 3쇄" (2006), 두산동아
- "楡家の人びと", 『CD-ROM版新潮文庫の100冊』から採集, ~
- "柔らかな頬(上)(手作業で採集)", ~
- "『나의 미끄럽틀 그리고 오후』『폭군과 강아지』『남과 북』『먼동1』『그러나1』『그리운 남쪽』『숨은 사랑』『울음』『청자 깨어지는 소리』(『2007년도21세기세종계획최종성과물말뭉치』から採集)", ~
- "柔らかな頬(上)", ~
- "哀しい予感", ~
- "五分後の世界", ~
- "東京タワー", ~
- "蹴りたい背中", ~
- "ブレイブ･ストーリー第１部", ~
- "博士の愛した数式", ~
- "さようらな、私の本よ第1部", ~