会話体のノダと해(요)体の終結語尾に関する日韓対照研究－エヴィデンシャリティ(evidentiality)の観点から－
The Contrastive Study on noda of Colloquial Style in Japanese and the Final Suffixes of hay(yo) Style in Korean -From the Perspective of Evidentiality-
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast noda of colloquial style in Japanese and the final suffixes of hay(yo) style in Korean from the perspective of evidentiality. Analysis results are as follows. (1) The Korean language has the grammatical means of indicating the source of information i.e. evidentiality, whereas the Japanese language does not have the grammatical means. Instead noda of periphrastic construction in Japanese refers to evidentiality. (2) Because of the differences of way to express the evidentiality between Japanese and Korean, noda of colloquial style in Japanese does not correspond to kesita in Korean, in spite of their structural similarity. (3) Because Korean has the grammatical means of indicating evidentiality, kesita does not need to express evidentiality. On the other hand, because Japanese does not have the specific forms, noda is used to encode evidentiality.
참고문헌 (40)
- 권익수, "한국어 종결어미 ‘-네’의 의미 재고찰: 정경숙(2012)에 대한 다른 생각", 언어, 38(1), pp.53~66 (2013), 한국언어학회
- 문창학, "현대 한국어 종결어미 –네(요)와 –군(요)", 언어와언어학, (64), pp.83~110 (2014), 언어연구소
- 박재연, "한국어 양태 어미 연구" (2006), 國語學會
- 박재연, "한국어 관형사형 어미의 의미 기능과 그 문법 범주", 한국어학, 43, pp.151~177 (2009), 한국어학회
- 박진호, "韓國語에서 證據性이나 意外性의 의미성분을 포함하는 문법요소", 언어와 정보 사회, 15, pp.1~25 (2011), 언어정보연구소
- 박진호, "7인의 젊은 학자들이 본 한국어 통사론의 현상과 이론", pp.173~224 (2011), 태학사
- 송재목, "한국어 ‘증거성’ 종결어미 ‘-네’: 정경숙(2007, 2012)에 대한 대답", 언어, 39(4), pp.819~850 (2014), 한국언어학회
- 장경희, "現代國語의 様態範疇研究" (1985), 塔出版社
- 정경숙, "한국어 종결어미 '-네'의 의미: 증거성 및 의외성과 관련해서", 언어, 37(4), pp.995~1016 (2012), 한국언어학회
- 李南姫, "現代日本語の｢のだ｣文の総合的な研究", 博士, pp.2001
- 印省熙, "日本語の｢のだ｣と韓国語の｢-ㄴ것이다｣─会話文の平叙文の場合-", 朝鮮語研究, 3, pp.51~94 (2006), 朝鮮語研究会
- 奥田靖雄, "ことばの科学4", pp.173~216 (1990), むぎ書房
- 佐冶圭三, "日本語の文法の研究", pp.197~261 (1991), ひつじ書房
- 田野村忠温, "現代日本語の文法Ⅰ ｢のだ｣の意味と用法", pp.1~244 (1990), 和泉書院
- 寺村秀夫, "日本語のシンタクスと意味Ⅱ", pp.261~311 (1984), くろしお出版
- 名嶋義直, "ノダの意味･機能", pp.1~323 (2007), くろしお出版
- 野田春美, "｢の(だ)｣の機能", pp.1~271 (1997), くろしお出版
- 野田春美, "新日本語文法選書4 モダリティ", pp.230~260 (2002), くろしお出版
- 野田春美, "ひつじ意味論講座第4巻 モダリティⅡ:事例研究", pp.141~157 (2012), ひつじ書房
- 益岡隆志, "モダリティの文法", pp.139~155 (1991), くろしお出版
- 益岡隆志, "日本語のモダリティ探求", pp.85~108 (2007), くろしお出版
- 문창학, "平叙文の文末形式に関する日韓対照研究 –意味論的意味と語用論的意味の観点から–", 일본연구, (56), pp.243~264 (2013), 일본연구소
- 山口佳也, "｢のだ｣の文とその仲間文構造に即して考える", pp.1~299 (2011), 三省堂
- 吉田茂晃, "ノダ形式の構造と表現効果", 国文論叢, 15, pp.46~55 (1988), 神戸大学文学部国語国文学会
- Aikhenvald, A. Y., "Studies in Evidentiality" (2003), John Benjanmins
- Aikhenvald, A. Y., "Evidentiality" (2004), Oxford U.P
- Bybee, j., "Morphology: a study of the relation between meaning and form" (1985), John Benjamins
- Chafe, W., "Evidentiality: the linguistic coding of epistemology" (1986), Ablex
- Gilbert, L., "On the grammaticalization of evidentiality", Journal of Pragmatics, 33, pp.359~367 (2001)
- Lee, H. S., "Tense, Aspect, and Modality: A Discourse-Pragmatic Analysis of Affixes in Korean from a Typological Perspective", Doctor, pp.1991
- Lee, H. S., "Cognitive constraints on expressing newly perceived information, with reference to epistemic modal suffixes in Korean", Cognitive Linguistics, 4(2), pp.135~167 (1993)
- Lee, H. S., "A discourse-pragmatic analysis of the Commital -ci in Korean: A synthetic approach to the form-meaning relation", Journal of Pragmatics, 31, pp.243~275 (1999)
- Willet, T., "A Cross-Linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality", Studies in Languages, 12(1), pp.51~97 (1988)
- 綿矢りさ, (2004)
- 桐野夏生, (2000)
- 宮部みゆき, (2006)
- 吉本ばなな, (2007)
- 大江健三郎, (2008)
- 江國香織, (2005)
- 小川洋子, (2004)