일제강점기 재조일본인의 ‘향토’ 담론과 조선 민요론
The hometown statement of the Japanese who lived in the Korean Peninsula at the colony term, and the Korean folk song theory
1
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, I considered the process in which folk songs, a typical genre of provincial art, was discovered in Korea, and the feature which the hometown in Korea was used as the principal theme of Korean folk songs. Even now, when a Japanese interlocutor who has lived in Korea discusses a Korean folk song, the concept of hometown does not arise. However, when discussing Korean folk songs, the concept of hometown is a very important element that exudes ethnicity and history. Nanba Sentarou (1894-?) describes the strong connectivity of ethnicity, folk songs, and hometown, and expressed the peculiar difference of folk songs of Korea in contrast to those of Japan. Since this connectivity is not recognized by Noguchi Ujyo (1882-1945), a paragon of Japanese folk songs, Nanba and Noguchi clashed in the paper about a folk song respectively. Nanba’s recognition resonated with the Japanese poets of the Tanka (poem of 31 syllables) genre who lived on the Korean Peninsula and critics supporting folk arts such as Asakawa Noritaka (1884-1964). That is, the Korean folk song was positioned as Korean hometown poetry, and as a treasure that can reveal Korean ethnic traits. We can read an understanding about culture and ethnic traits peculiar to Korea from the perspective of Japanese folklorists. The position of other Japanese who deemed Koreans and Korean culture as inferior and accordingly discriminated against them differs in this attitude.
Abstract
In this paper, I considered the process in which folk songs, a typical genre of provincial art, was discovered in Korea, and the feature which the hometown in Korea was used as the principal theme of Korean folk songs. Even now, when a Japanese interlocutor who has lived in Korea discusses a Korean folk song, the concept of hometown does not arise. However, when discussing Korean folk songs, the concept of hometown is a very important element that exudes ethnicity and history. Nanba Sentarou (1894-?) describes the strong connectivity of ethnicity, folk songs, and hometown, and expressed the peculiar difference of folk songs of Korea in contrast to those of Japan. Since this connectivity is not recognized by Noguchi Ujyo (1882-1945), a paragon of Japanese folk songs, Nanba and Noguchi clashed in the paper about a folk song respectively. Nanba’s recognition resonated with the Japanese poets of the Tanka (poem of 31 syllables) genre who lived on the Korean Peninsula and critics supporting folk arts such as Asakawa Noritaka (1884-1964). That is, the Korean folk song was positioned as Korean hometown poetry, and as a treasure that can reveal Korean ethnic traits. We can read an understanding about culture and ethnic traits peculiar to Korea from the perspective of Japanese folklorists. The position of other Japanese who deemed Koreans and Korean culture as inferior and accordingly discriminated against them differs in this attitude.
참고문헌 (42)
- 구인모, "한국 근대시의 이상과 허상-1920년대 ‘국민문학’의 논리-", pp.119~210 (2008), 소명출판
- 권태효, "개항기에서 일제강점기까지의 문헌신화 자료 수집 및 정리 현황과 문제점", 한국민속학, 44, pp.5~47 (2006), 한국민속학회
- 김태웅, "일제강점기 小田內通敏의 朝鮮統治 인식과 ‘朝鮮部落調査’", 한국사연구, 151(151), pp.309~356 (2010), 한국사연구회
- 엄인경, "한반도 간행 일본전통시가 자료집 단카 잡지1", pp.15~25 (2013), 도서출판 이회
- 엄인경, "한반도의 단카(短歌) 잡지 『진인(真人)』과 조선의 민요", 비교일본학, 30, pp.169~195 (2014), 일본학국제비교연구소
- 李光洙, "民謡に現はれたる朝鮮民族性の一端", 真人, 5(1), pp.70~75 (1927), 真人社
- 이소영, "식민지 근대의 잡가와 민요", 한국음악연구, 46, pp.215~242 (2009), 한국국악학회
- 李殷相, "靑孀民謡小考", 真人, 5(1), pp.92~108 (1927), 真人社
- 임경화, "근대 한국과 일본의 민요의 창출", pp.155~200 (2005), 소명출판
- 崔南善, "朝鮮民謡の概観", 真人, 5(1), pp.2~11 (1927)
- 秋葉隆, "母から聞いた話－鄕土の民俗", 文敎の朝鮮, (90) (1933), 朝鮮敎育會
- 浅川伯敎, "朝鮮民芸に就て", 真人, 5(1), pp.48~49 (1927), 真人社
- 市山盛雄, "諸家の地方歌壇に対する考察", 真人, 4(1), pp.8~20 (1926), 真人社
- 市山盛雄, "朝鮮の民謡に関する雑記", 真人, 5(1), pp.119~124 (1927), 真人社
- 市山盛雄, "朝鮮民謡の研究", pp.1~163 (1927), 坂本書店
- 伊藤純郎, "郷土教育運動の研究", pp.61~78 (2008), 思文閣
- 井上収, "抒情詩芸術としての民謡", 真人, 5(1), pp.45~ (1927), 真人社
- 今村螺炎, "朝鮮の民謡", 真人, 5(1), pp.86~ (1927), 真人社
- 岡田貢, "朝鮮の民謡に現はれた諸相", 真人, 5(1), pp.54~ (1927), 真人社
- 小田内通敏, "朝鮮部落調査資料", 朝鮮, (81) (1921), 朝鮮総督府
- 小田内通敏, "朝鮮の地方的硏究", 朝鮮, (121) (1925), 朝鮮総督府
- 小田内通敏, "朝鮮の人文地理學的諸問題", 朝鮮, (124) (1925), 朝鮮総督府
- 尾高豊作, , 郷土科学, (18), pp.1~ (1932), 郷土教育連盟
- 慶尙北道敎育會, "地理敎育の硏究", pp.266~270 (1933), 慶尙北道敎育會
- 國分麻里, "植民地朝鮮における1930年前後の郷土教育論--『文教の朝鮮』『朝鮮の教育研究』の記事を手がかりにして", 埼玉社会科教育研究, (14), pp.1~13 (2008), 埼玉大学社会科教育研究会
- 小寺融吉, "鄕土舞踊と民謠", 民族, 1(2), pp.143~144 (1925), 民族發行所
- 小寺融吉, "鄕土舞踊と民謠", 民族, 1(3), pp.153~ (1925), 民族發行所
- 坂井俊樹, "現代韓国における歴史教育の成立と葛藤", pp.27~ (2003), 御茶ノ水書房
- 高木敏雄, "郷土研究の本質", 郷土研究, (創刊), pp.4~11 (1913)
- 槻木瑞生, "戦前｢外地｣における郷土教育", 玉川大学教育博物館紀要, (6), pp.35~41 (2009), 玉川大学教育博物館
- 難波専太郎, "朝鮮民謡の特質", 真人, 5(1), pp.77~84 (1927), 真人社
- 難波専太郎, "朝鮮風土記", pp.185~190 (1928), 大阪屋
- 野口雨情, "定本野口雨情第八巻", pp.38~49 (1987), 未来社
- 野口雨情, "鄕土藝術の話", 朝鮮及滿洲, (198), pp.66~67 (1924), 朝鮮及滿洲社
- 野口雨情, "土の民謡に就て", 真人, 6(3), pp.62~63 (1928), 真人社
- 野澤秀樹, "柳田国男と小田内通敏ー｢郷土研究｣をめぐってー", 放送大学研究年報, (26), pp.127~142 (2008), 放送大学
- 蓮間森信, "鄕土の敎育化", 文敎の朝鮮, (39), pp.40~43 (1929), 朝鮮敎育會
- 浜口良光, "朝鮮民謡の味", 真人, 5(1), pp.39~ (1927), 真人社
- 四 ヱルザス, ロ－トリンゲン州初等學校に於ける國語敎授敎案, エルザス ロ-トリンゲン洲 國語敎育に關する調査報告, "保科孝一", 朝鮮總督府, 60~ (1913)
- 松本真英, "中等學校に於ける鄕土地理としての朝鮮地方の取扱", 文敎の朝鮮, (84), pp.34~38 (1932), 朝鮮敎育會
- 道久良, "火田民の生活と歌謡", 真人, 5(1), pp.109~ (1927), 真人社
- 森暢, "郷土文芸に就いて", 郷土科学, (7), pp.115~122 (1931), 鄕土敎育聯盟