意見陳述の終結部における聞き手の言語行動 -韓国語を母語とする日本語非母語話者の 日本語熟達度による比較から-
Listeners’ linguistic behaviors in the closings of opinion statements -Comparison of the behaviors based on the korean non-native speakers’ proficiency in Japanese-
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, I investigated how listeners respond to the opinion statements in the conversational closings. I analyzed the Japanese conversation of opinion exchange in contact situations to make a comparison of the behavioral features between the advanced- and intermediate-level Japanese speakers. Based on if there were the listeners’ responses to the opinion statements and if the listeners took speaking turns or the speakers held speaking turns right after the closings, the conversational closings have the following four types, “response – turn-taking”, “no response – turn-taking”, “response – turn-holding” and “no response – turn-holding”. Frequency of those four types was used for the comparison. The results showed that the frequency of “response – turn-taking” was the highest in the contact situations by the conversational participants including the advanced-level Japanese speakers. The participants most commonly took speaking turns after responding to the conversational partners’ opinion statements in the closings. By contrast, the frequency of “no response – turn-taking” was the highest in the contact situations by the participants including the intermediate-level speakers. The behavioral feature was that the participants took speaking turns without responding to the conversational partners’ opinion statements. The results revealed that non-native Japanese speakers apparently have such tendency.
Abstract
In this study, I investigated how listeners respond to the opinion statements in the conversational closings. I analyzed the Japanese conversation of opinion exchange in contact situations to make a comparison of the behavioral features between the advanced- and intermediate-level Japanese speakers. Based on if there were the listeners’ responses to the opinion statements and if the listeners took speaking turns or the speakers held speaking turns right after the closings, the conversational closings have the following four types, “response – turn-taking”, “no response – turn-taking”, “response – turn-holding” and “no response – turn-holding”. Frequency of those four types was used for the comparison. The results showed that the frequency of “response – turn-taking” was the highest in the contact situations by the conversational participants including the advanced-level Japanese speakers. The participants most commonly took speaking turns after responding to the conversational partners’ opinion statements in the closings. By contrast, the frequency of “no response – turn-taking” was the highest in the contact situations by the participants including the intermediate-level speakers. The behavioral feature was that the participants took speaking turns without responding to the conversational partners’ opinion statements. The results revealed that non-native Japanese speakers apparently have such tendency.
참고문헌 (7)
- 李善雅, "議論の場におけるあいづち:日本語母語話者と韓国人学習者の相違", 世界の日本語教育, 日本語教育論集, 11, pp.139~152 (2001), 国際交流基金
- 岩田夏穂, "日本語学習者と母語話者の会話参加における変化:非対称的参加から対称的参加へ", 世界の日本語教育, 日本語教育論集, 15, pp.135~151 (2005), 国際交流基金
- Komatsu Nana, "意見陳述の終結部における会話参加の様相 ─ 意見交換の深まりとの関連に着目して ─", 일본학보, (115), pp.1~20 (2018), 한국일본학회[DOI]
- 佐々木泰子, "接触場面と母語場面:体験談の終結部から見たその特徴", 言語文化と日本語教育, 39, pp.33~40 (2010), お茶の水女子大学日本言語文化学研究会
- Brown, G., "Discourse analysis", pp.58~60 (1983), Cambridge University Press
- Goodwin, C., "Rethinking Context: Language as an Interpretive Phenomenon", pp.147~190 (1992), Cambridge University Press
- Leech, G., "Principles of Pragmatics", pp.23~24 (1983), Longman
