意外の意味を表す「さえ・まで・すら」をめぐって -承接の類型及び傾向の実体調査-
Concerning “SAE・MADE・SURA” which means “unexpected”
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Among contemporary Japanese “collecting particles”, “SAE・MADE・SURA”, which means “unexpected”, is a Japanese educational point of view, especially for learners who do not speak Japanese as their mother tongue. Distinguishing between points and differences is never easy. From this point of view, “SAE・MADE・SURA” was examined with a focus on the tendency of connection relationships. More specifically, “SAE・MADE・SURA” through a large amount of materials (the Asahi Shimbun editorial and the novel of Shincho Bunko 100) is what element is combined with, or what kind of constraint when combined. It was described as to whether or not there is. First of all, when combining before “SAE-MADE-SURA”, “SAE” and “SURA” were often “ga” on the surface, but most of them are “ga” which means theme. It was a case. Next, we investigated the tendency of case particles in the form of “noun + case particle”. As a result of the survey, it was confirmed that “SAE” is the one that can be contacted with the most elements among “SAE-MADE-SURA”. When dealing with the word, there were some examples of “SAE” and “MADE”, but since the quantity was small, it is thought that it is difficult to co-occur with the word. And when joining after “SAE-MADE-SURA”, there are fewer types than the elements that join before, but among them, the particles “ga” and “mo” often co-occur. I understand that. In the case of “SAE” and “SURA”, only the “mo” rating is attached. In the case of “MADE”, there were many elements that were followed by “SAE” and “SURA”, but among them, the “ga” rating was the most confirmed. As mentioned above, it became clear that there is a certain difference between the judgment based on introspection and the actual data. In many cases, there were no cases in the actual data that could be judged based on introspection. Of course, just because it doesn’t exist in the actual data doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist in that format.
Abstract
Among contemporary Japanese “collecting particles”, “SAE・MADE・SURA”, which means “unexpected”, is a Japanese educational point of view, especially for learners who do not speak Japanese as their mother tongue. Distinguishing between points and differences is never easy. From this point of view, “SAE・MADE・SURA” was examined with a focus on the tendency of connection relationships. More specifically, “SAE・MADE・SURA” through a large amount of materials (the Asahi Shimbun editorial and the novel of Shincho Bunko 100) is what element is combined with, or what kind of constraint when combined. It was described as to whether or not there is. First of all, when combining before “SAE-MADE-SURA”, “SAE” and “SURA” were often “ga” on the surface, but most of them are “ga” which means theme. It was a case. Next, we investigated the tendency of case particles in the form of “noun + case particle”. As a result of the survey, it was confirmed that “SAE” is the one that can be contacted with the most elements among “SAE-MADE-SURA”. When dealing with the word, there were some examples of “SAE” and “MADE”, but since the quantity was small, it is thought that it is difficult to co-occur with the word. And when joining after “SAE-MADE-SURA”, there are fewer types than the elements that join before, but among them, the particles “ga” and “mo” often co-occur. I understand that. In the case of “SAE” and “SURA”, only the “mo” rating is attached. In the case of “MADE”, there were many elements that were followed by “SAE” and “SURA”, but among them, the “ga” rating was the most confirmed. As mentioned above, it became clear that there is a certain difference between the judgment based on introspection and the actual data. In many cases, there were no cases in the actual data that could be judged based on introspection. Of course, just because it doesn’t exist in the actual data doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist in that format.
참고문헌 (13)
- 市川保子, "とりたて助詞と発話・伝達のモダリティに関する一考察", 文芸言語研究, 19, pp.53~71 (1991), 筑波大学文芸・言語学系
- 奥津敬一郎, "生成日本文法論", pp.169~179 (1974), 大修館書店
- 菊地康人, "サエとデサエ", 日本語科学, 6, pp.7~31 (1999), 国立国語研究所
- 澤田美恵子, "「とりたて」という概念の創出", 日本語学, 19(5), pp.110~119 (2000)
- 鈴木重幸, "日本語文法・形態論", pp.173~184 (1972), むぎ書房
- 寺村秀夫, "ムードの形式と意味(3)-取立て助詞について-", 文芸言語研究, 6, pp.53~67 (1981), 筑波大学文芸・言語学系
- 寺村秀夫, "日本語のシンタクスの意味Ⅲ", pp.3~37 (1991), くろしお出版
- 中西久美子, "日本語類義表現の文法(上)単文編", pp.306~316 (1995), くろしお出版
- 沼田善子, "いわゆる日本語助詞の研究", pp.107~225 (1986), 凡人社
- 沼田善子, "日本語文法セルフマスターシリーズ5", pp.11~39 (1992), くろしお出版
- 三井正孝, "もの〈提題〉性:現代日本語の場合", 日本語と日本文学, 32, pp.65~79 (2001)
- 宮田幸一, "日本語文法の輪郭", pp.53~61 (1948), 三省堂
- 茂木俊伸, "とりたて詞「まで」「さえ」について―否定との関わりから―", 日本語と日本文学, 28, pp.27~36 (1999), 筑波大学国語国文学会
