「と思う」の用法に関する記述的研究 －推量用法と記憶再生用法－
Study of the Japanese thinking verb “to-omou” -inferred usage and memory regeneration usage-
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims at revealing the features of inferred usage of “to-omou”, and the differences between inferred usage and memory regeneration one. First, in the inferred usage we can find the syntagmatical relation between a sentence of premise and an inferred sentence. However, in the memory regeneration usage, we cannot find the syntagmatical relation anymore. Secondary, adverbs such as “tabun” and “kitto” are used in the inferred usage, but “tashika” is found in the memory regeneration usage more often. Thirdly, only past tense can be used in the memory regeneration usage, but all of the tense is used in the inferred one. However, the memory regeneration usage is closing to inferred one, when there is a syntagmatical relation, and is co-occurred with “tabun“ and present tense. So, sometimes it is not clear to distinguish the usage of the sentence from another one.
Abstract
This paper aims at revealing the features of inferred usage of “to-omou”, and the differences between inferred usage and memory regeneration one. First, in the inferred usage we can find the syntagmatical relation between a sentence of premise and an inferred sentence. However, in the memory regeneration usage, we cannot find the syntagmatical relation anymore. Secondary, adverbs such as “tabun” and “kitto” are used in the inferred usage, but “tashika” is found in the memory regeneration usage more often. Thirdly, only past tense can be used in the memory regeneration usage, but all of the tense is used in the inferred one. However, the memory regeneration usage is closing to inferred one, when there is a syntagmatical relation, and is co-occurred with “tabun“ and present tense. So, sometimes it is not clear to distinguish the usage of the sentence from another one.
참고문헌 (30)
- 奥田靖雄, "おしはかり(１)", 日本語学, 3(12), pp.54~69 (1984), 明治書院
- 奥田靖雄, "おしはかり(２)", 日本語学, 4(2), pp.48~62 (1985), 明治書院
- 工藤浩, "日本語の文法３", pp.161~234 (2000), ひつじ書房
- 工藤真由美, "現代日本語ムード･テンス･アスペクト論" (2014), ひつじ書房
- 高橋美保, "『と思う』の用法に関する記述的研究─形容詞述語文を中心に─", 言語文化, 40, pp.27~44 (2017), 韓国日本言語文化学会
- TAKAHASHI MIHO, "「と思う」の用法に関する記述的研究 -名詞述語文を中心に-", 일어일문학연구, 107(1), pp.81~101 (2018), 한국일어일문학회[DOI]
- 鄭相哲, "日本語認識モダリティの機能的研究─ダロウを中心に─" (2004), J&C
- 宮崎和人, "動詞｢思う｣のモーダルな用法について", 現代日本語研究, (8), pp.111~113 (2001), 大阪大学大学院文学研究科日本語学講座
- 宮崎和人, "《推量》と《説明》－テクストにおける｢にちがいない｣をともなう文の機能―", 岡山大学大学院社会文化科学研究科紀要, 35, pp.23~38 (2013)
- 森山卓郎, "文末思考動詞『思う』をめぐって－文の意味としての主観性·客観性－", 日本語学, 11(9), pp.105~116 (1992), 明治書院
- "博士の愛した数式", ~
- "秘密", ~
- "探偵ガリレオ", ~
- "片想い", ~
- "容疑者Ｘの献身", ~
- "手紙", ~
- "ナミヤ雑貨店の奇跡", ~
- "祈りの幕が下がるとき", ~
- "人魚の眠る家", ~
- "ラプラスの魔女", ~
- "夢幻花", ~
- "クリーピー", ~
- "ゼロの焦点", ~
- "ロクヨン(上)(下)", ~
- "羊をめぐる冒険(上)(下)", ~
- "コスメティック", ~
- "世界の中心で愛を叫ぶ", ~
- "十日目の蝉", ~
- "点と線", ~
- "火車｣など", ~