경계선지능 초등학생 의심대상자 실태조사: 충청북도 지역을 중심으로
Survey on Suspected Borderline Intellectual Functioning Elementary School Students: Focusing on the Chuncheongbuk-do Region
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구는충청북도 지역의경계선지능 초등학생 의심대상자의현황과 실태를파악하는 것을목적으로 한다. 이를 위해충청북도소재의초등학교학생의부모639명을대상으로경계선지적기능선별척도설문조사를실시하였으며, 표본학교내확률추출된학급의모든학생에대해전수조사를실시하였다. 조사결과는가중치를부여하여분석하였다. 본 연구의주요결과는다음과같다. 첫째, 충청북도지역의 경계선지능의심 초등학생의 비율은16.5%로 나타났다. 둘째, 성별에 따른 경계선지능 의심 초등학생의 비율은 남학생의경우전체남학생중22%, 여학생의경우 전체여학생중10.7%로 나타났으며, 성별에 따라 유의한 차이가나타났다. 셋째, 학년에 따른경계선지능의심초등학생의비율은2학년과3학년이각각21.6%로 가장높았으나, 학년에 따라 유의한 차이가나타나지않았다. 넷째, 일상생활 부적응 문제 영역에따른경계선지능의심초등학생의비율은위험군학생의경우인지능력영역에서가장높은것으로나타난반면, 잠재군학생의 경우성격·정서 영역에서 가장 높은것으로나타났다. 다섯째, 정상군과 경계선지능 잠재군, 위험군학생에 따라 일상생활 부적응 및 문제영역별점수에서 유의한차이가 나타났으며, 특히 사회성 영역에서집단간차이가가장크게나타났다. 이러한결과를바탕으로본연구의의의와제한점을논의하였다
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to identify the current status and conditions of suspected borderline intellectual functioning (BIF) elementary students in the Chungcheongbuk-do region. For this purpose, a survey was conducted using the Borderline Intellectual Functioning Screening Scale among the parents of 639 elementary school students in Chungcheongbuk-do. A full-scale survey was also conducted on all students in a randomly selected class within the sampled schools. The survey results were analyzed with weighted data. The main findings of this study are as follows. First, the proportion of suspected BIF elementary students in the Chungcheongbuk-do region was 16.5%. Second, regarding gender differences, 22% of male students and 10.7% of female students were identified as suspected BIF, showing a significant difference between genders. Third, the proportion of suspected BIF students by grade was highest in the second and third grades(21.6%), although no significant differences were found by grade. Fourth, among the domains of daily maladjustment, the at-risk group showed the highest prevalence in the domain of cognitive functioning, whereas the potential BIF group showed the highest prevalence in the domain of personality and emotional regulation. Fifth, significant differences in daily maladjustment and domain-specific problem scores were observed among the normal, potential BIF, and at-risk groups, with the most substantial group differences found in the domain of social functioning. Based on these results, the implications and limitations of this study are discussed