전략적 증거제시(SUE) 기법과 증거 강도(強度)의 진술 변화 판별 효과성
Effects of Strategic Use of Evidence and Strength of Evidence on the Change in the Suspect’s Statement
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
기만적인 단서들을 발견하고 이에 따른 진실성을 판단하는 것은 경찰의 수사면담에서 중요한 부분이다. 수사면담에서용의자와의 대치 상황 중 중요한 문제는 유력한 용의자가 일반적으로 혐의가 있는 정보를 제공하지 않는다는 것인데, 이에 대응하기 위해 개발된 면담기법이 전략적 증거제시 기법이다. 이에 이 연구에서는 증거의 특성 중 해당 증거가범행을 얼마나 입증할 수 있는지에 관한 강도를 전략적 증거제시 기법에 대입할 시, 범행 관련 진술 및 진술 변화에어떠한 영향을 미치는지 알아보고자 하였다. 모의범죄 과제는 총 3단계로 나누어 진행하였으며, 참가자들 전원은 조건없이 동일한 과제를 수행하였다. 짧은 해킹 영상 과제를 시청한 다음 주어진 해당 사이트에 접속해 해킹 코드 입력 및기초 코딩으로 해킹 프로그램을 심게 하였고, 해킹에 대한 주요 정보 및 관련 내용을 포함한 문서를 가져오는 작업으로마무리하였다. 종속변인은 진술 변화로서, 면담의 단계마다 진술이 어떻게 변화되는지 확인하였다. 연구 결과, 강도가강한 증거를 제시할수록 더 많은 진술 변화를 이끌어내었고, 전략적으로 증거를 제시할수록 더 많은 범행을 시인하는것으로 나타났다. 그러나 증거의 강도와 전략적 증거제시 기법에 따른 상호작용 효과는 유의미하지 않았다. 이러한결과를 바탕으로 증거의 강도와 전략적 증거제시 기법의 의의와 한계에 대해 논의하였으며 향후 연구 방향에 대해제언하였다.
Abstract
Detecting deceptive clues and judging their truthfulness is an important part of police investigation interviews. An important problem in confrontation situations with suspects in investigation interviews is that strong suspects generally do not provide incriminating information, and the interview technique developed to address this is the strategic evidence presentation technique. Accordingly, this study aimed to examine how the strength of the evidence, which is the characteristic of evidence that can prove the crime, affects statements and changes in statements related to the crime when applied to the strategic evidence presentation technique. The mock crime task was divided into three stages, and all participants performed the same task without conditions. After watching a short hacking video task, they accessed the given site, entered hacking codes, and installed hacking programs using basic coding. They finished by retrieving documents containing key information and related content about hacking. The dependent variable was the change in statements, and it was confirmed how the statements changed at each stage of the interview. The results of the study showed that the stronger the evidence presented, the more changes in statements were made, and the more strategically the evidence was presented, the more crimes were admitted. However, the interaction effect according to the strength of evidence and the strategic evidence presentation technique was not significant. Finally, based on these results, the significance and limitations of the strength of evidence and the strategic evidence presentation technique were discussed, and suggestions were made for future research directions.
참고문헌 (37)
- 장민환, "수사연구지 : 장민환의 수사심리학" (2021), 수리원
- Ask, K., "The psychology of criminal investigation : From theory to practice" (2018), Routledge
- Bull, R., "Police interrogations and false confessions: Current research, practice, and policy recommendations" (2010), American Psychological Association
- Granhag, P. A., "Deception detection: Current challenges and new approaches" (2015), John Wiley & Sons
- Hartwig, M., "Credibility assessment: Scientific research and applications" (2014), Academic Press
- Lassiter, G., "Police interrogations and false confessions: Current research, practice, and policy recommendations" (2010), American Psychological Association
- Luke, T. J., "Finding the truth in the courtroom: Dealing with deception, lies, and memories" (2018), Oxford University Press
- Meissner, C. A., "The Oxford handbook of psychology and law" (2023), Oxford University Press
- Otgaar, H., "Finding the truth in the courtroom: Dealing with deception, lies, and memories" (2017), Oxford University Press
- 김성룡, "현행법에서 과학적 증거의 증거능력과 증명력", 형사법연구, 24(4) (2012), 한국형사법학회
- 이종엽, "법심리학적 관점에서 본 진술증거의 평가방법", 저스티스, pp.172~222 (2010)
- 장민환, "피의자 신문에서 전략적 증거제시(SUE)기법의 활용", 범죄수사학연구, 8(1) (2022), 경찰대학 범죄수사연구원
- 한유화, "배심 설시문 내용에 대한 일반인의 사전지식 및 이해도", 사회과학연구, 35(1) (2019), 경성대학교 사회과학연구소
- Baldwin, J., "Police interview techniques: Establishing truth or proof?", The British Journal of Criminology, 33(3) (1993)
- Bandura, A., "Social cognitive theory of self-regulation", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2) (1991)
- Brimbal, L., "Perceptions of suspect statements: A comparison of exposed lies and confessions", Psychology, Crime & Law, 24(2) (2018)
- DePaulo, B. M., "Cues to deception", Psychological Bulletin, 129(1) (2003)
- Griffin, D., "The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence", Cognitive Psychology, 24(3) (1992)
- Granhag, P. A., "Repeated interrogations–stretching the deception detection paradigm", Expert Evidence, 7 (1999)
- Granhag, P. A., "Repeated interrogations : Verbal and non-verbal cues to deception", Applied Cognitive Psychology : The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 16(3) (2002)
- Granhag, P. A., "Eliciting cues to deception by tactical disclosure of evidence : The first test of the evidence framing matrix", Legal and Criminological Psychology, 18(2), pp.341~355 (2013)
- Griffin, D., "The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence", Cognitive Psychology, 24(3), pp.411~435 (1992)
- Hartwig, M., "Detecing deception via strategic disclosure of evidence", Law and Human Behavior, 29(4) (2005)
- Hartwig, M., "Guilty and innocent suspects’ strategies during police interrogations", Psychology, Crime & Law, 13(2) (2007)
- Jang, M., "Impacts of evidence on decision-making in police investigation", Doctor, pp.2021
- Luke, T. J., "How awareness of possible evidence induces forthcoming counter interrogation strategies", Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(6) (2014)
- Luke, T. J., "Countermeasures against the strategic use of evidence technique : Effects on suspects’ strategies", Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 13(2) (2016)
- Lieberman J. D., "Gold versus platinum : Do jurors recognize the superiority and limitations of DNA evidence compared to other types of forensic evidence?", Public Policy and Law, 14(1) (2008)
- MacKenzie, M. B., "A conceptual framework for understanding self-regulation in adults", New Ideas in Psychology, 30(2) (2012)
- May, L., "Interviewing suspects in denial: On how different evidence disclosure modes affect the elicitation of new critical information", Frontiers in Psychology, 8(1154) (2017)
- Oleszkiewicz, S., "A meta analytic review of the timing for disclosing evidence when interviewing suspects", Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(2), pp.342~359 (2021)
- Stanley, J. T., "A comparison of the effectiveness of two types of deceit detection training methods in older adults", Cognitive Research : Principles and Implications, 26(4) (2019)
- Tekin, S., "Interviewing strategically to elicit admissions from guilty suspects", Law and Human Behavior, 39(3) (2015)
- Tekin, S., "How to make perpetrators in denial disclose more information about their crimes", Psychology, Crime & Law, 22(6) (2016)
- Vrij, A., "Deception and truth detection when analyzing nonverbal and verbal cues", Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(2) (2019)
- Vrij, A., "Outsmarting the liars : The benefit of asking unanticipated questions", Law and Human Behavior, 33 (2009)
- Vrij, A., "Reading lies : Nonverbal communication and deception", Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1) (2019)