서발턴의 생활글과 민족문학론의 재구성

Abstract

90's began, and national literature disappeared in our memory after slow small with the fall of Socialist bloc. By the way, an important thing is by discourse of the theory center of intellectuals and them that it may be said that substance of national literature which we remember is an elite and a fact to say. Therefore, an existing study for the theory of national literature was not reflects an on-site voice, the document ended it early without it being examined. Therefore, memories and diaries of subaltern prepare for the seat which can revaluate existing national literature evaluated through a life writings only at the elite center in this sentence in 1970's. We call the source of national literature which we included work novel in well in 1980's memories and diaries of workers in 70's. By the way, when we evaluated national literature, the source were removed thoroughly. Therefore, it is theory of national literature mainly on a worker's life writings to say representative subaltern in 1970's in this sentence, it was reconstructed. I was going to make clear that worker's literature awareness and they were the most positive subject of national literature by this process. It will proofread sight of disconnection a single line to see national literature to examine national literature mainly on such subaltern again. In addition, the thing that is the most important in a life writings is a purpose and a saying point with the opportunity when liberation is importance of writings of voluntary feelings and flavor. I have begun to be aware of subaltern as the subject of the history and literature by oneself by this process. Therefore, a positive research for writings of subaltern offers a new chapter of writings of participation and, it will act with an opportunity literature escapes from the system zone or rule story theory, and it is become common, and to form democratization of a genuine writings.