소년사법절차에 관한 연구 -소년경찰의 다이버전을 중심으로-
Study on Juvenile Justice System: Focusing on Police’s Juvenile Diversion
0
조회
0
다운로드
23
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study focuses on the police diversion of juvenile offenders, such as release with a warning and guidance and protection measures that can be considered to be an earlier stage of the juvenile justice system. In practice, the police are the authority which faces the juvenile offender for the first time in the course of the juvenile justice against him/her, and is capable of making swift and precise factual judgments. As such, it is deemed more desirable for the police to attempt to divert juveniles whom it determines to have shown minor delinquent behaviors, than to commence formal criminal proceedings against juvenile offenders. The police diversion is the most efficient measure to help families,schools and local communities prevent juvenile delinquency with the least amount of resources available. The legal basis of such police diversion can be provided by adding specific and clear provisions to the current relevant laws and regulations on juvenile. Family conference can realize the concept of restoration in juvenile criminal law and vitalize the juvenile justice system with the advantage of using close family ties, which is the fundamental nature of Korean culture. Family has been heavily emphasized in the studies for juvenile delinquency because it is agreed that family takes a fundamentally important role in the adolescence of a juvenile and it is also regarded as the most important reason for development of juvenile delinquency. Furthermore, in order to promote specialization of the prosecution of juvenile crimes, an exclusive juvenile court needs to be established, because the juvenile justice procedure,unlike the general criminal procedure, essentially requires cultivation of specialists and experts in the field. Currently, Korea does not have such exclusive juvenile court and all juvenile cases are being handled by the Juvenile Departments of Seoul Family Court and other regional courts. Considering the distinct characteristics of juvenile crimes and the efficiency of the juvenile justice system in dealing with juvenile crimes, it would be desirable to establish a juvenile court that exclusively handles all juvenile cases.
Abstract
This study focuses on the police diversion of juvenile offenders, such as release with a warning and guidance and protection measures that can be considered to be an earlier stage of the juvenile justice system. In practice, the police are the authority which faces the juvenile offender for the first time in the course of the juvenile justice against him/her, and is capable of making swift and precise factual judgments. As such, it is deemed more desirable for the police to attempt to divert juveniles whom it determines to have shown minor delinquent behaviors, than to commence formal criminal proceedings against juvenile offenders. The police diversion is the most efficient measure to help families,schools and local communities prevent juvenile delinquency with the least amount of resources available. The legal basis of such police diversion can be provided by adding specific and clear provisions to the current relevant laws and regulations on juvenile. Family conference can realize the concept of restoration in juvenile criminal law and vitalize the juvenile justice system with the advantage of using close family ties, which is the fundamental nature of Korean culture. Family has been heavily emphasized in the studies for juvenile delinquency because it is agreed that family takes a fundamentally important role in the adolescence of a juvenile and it is also regarded as the most important reason for development of juvenile delinquency. Furthermore, in order to promote specialization of the prosecution of juvenile crimes, an exclusive juvenile court needs to be established, because the juvenile justice procedure,unlike the general criminal procedure, essentially requires cultivation of specialists and experts in the field. Currently, Korea does not have such exclusive juvenile court and all juvenile cases are being handled by the Juvenile Departments of Seoul Family Court and other regional courts. Considering the distinct characteristics of juvenile crimes and the efficiency of the juvenile justice system in dealing with juvenile crimes, it would be desirable to establish a juvenile court that exclusively handles all juvenile cases.
참고문헌 (43)
- 경찰청, "한국경찰사", ~ (2006)
- 국가인권위원회, "아동협약과 소년사법", ~ (2007)
- 청소년범죄추세분석: 1966-1998, "김성언", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (1999)
- 소년범죄자의 성인범죄자로의 전이에 관한 연구, "김준호", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (1995)
- 소년범의 범죄화과정 및 보호방안 연구, "박정선", 형사정책연구원, ~ (2004)
- 보건복지가족부, "아동청소년백서", ~ (2009)
- 사이버경찰청, "경찰백서", ~ (2007)
- 소년법상 자원보호자제도에 관한 연구, "이동진", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2002)
- 각국의 소년원제도에 관한 연구, "정재준", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2002)
- 청소년비행예방을 위한 소년보호기관의 역할확대 및 강화방안, "정재준", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2003)
- 청소년위원회, "청소년백서", ~ (2005)
- 최병각, "소년보호사건의 범위와 처리에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1998
- 황지태, "회복적 소년사법 조정실무가 실행지침", ~ (2006)
- 강경래, "소년사법과 회복적 사법", 피해자학연구, 17(1), pp.241~266 (2009), 한국피해자학회
- 김성돈, "우리나라 소년법의 검사선의주의모델의 개선방안", 저스티스, (88), pp.189~210 (2005), 한국법학원
- 김성언, "우리나라 청소년범죄의 현실과 전망", 형사정책연구, 11(4), pp.5~50 (2000)
- 21세기 소년사법개혁의 방향과 과제(I), "김은경", 형사정책연구, ~ (2007)
- 21세기 소년사법개혁의 방향과 과제(II);회복적 소년사법 실천모델의 효과성 연구, "김은경", 형사정책연구원, ~ (2008)
- 김재봉, "소년경찰과 다이버전", 형사정책, 17(1), pp.33~59 (2005), 한국형사정책학회
- 김지선, "英國의 父母敎育命令制度에 대한 批判的 檢討", 矯正硏究, 30, pp.109~129 (2006), 한국교정학회
- 외국의 새로운 소년범 처우제도, "노성호", 형사정책연구원, ~ (2000)
- 노호래, "청소년범죄자에 대한 경찰단계의 다이버젼", 법학연구, 19(19), pp.347~366 (2005), 한국법학회
- 문성도, "파출소장 훈방권의 법적 근거", 진주산업대학교논문집, 15, pp.697~748 (1995)
- 박광민, "한국의 소년범죄의 동향과 그 대책", 비교형사법연구, 10(2), pp.451~474 (2008), 한국비교형사법학회
- 신동운, "다이버전운동과 선도조건부 기소유예", 형사정책, 2, pp.5~14 (1987)
- 신동운, "수사지휘권의 귀속에 관한 연혁적 고찰(I)", 서울대 법학, 42(1), pp.178~231 (2001)
- 원혜욱, "적정한 소년사건처리절차의 보상", 형사정책, 11, pp.353~372 (1999)
- 윤동호, "소년범죄와 그 처리의 동향과 분석", 경성법학, 16(1), pp.39~58 (2007)
- 오경식, "한국의 回復的 少年司法에 관한 연구", 비교형사법연구, 10(2), pp.513~536 (2008), 한국비교형사법학회
- 이충수, "이충수-외국 소년법제의 비교에 관한 연구", 한국경찰학회보, 6(2), pp.153~180 (2004), 한국경찰학회
- 이호중, "소년범죄자에 대한 경찰단계의 비범죄화 정책제안- 경찰의 전문가 참여제와 회복적 공동체사법(Restorative Community Justice)", 형사정책연구, 15(3), pp.5~44 (2004), 한국형사정책연구원
- 임상규, "소년범죄의 합리적 처리방안", 형사법연구, (17), pp.237~258 (2002), 한국형사법학회
- 장중식, "소년범죄 처리와 소년법상의 문제점 및 개선방안", 矯正硏究, 41, pp.141~162 (2008), 한국교정학회
- 정희철, "少年法改正의 理論과 現實: 改正試案의 몇 가지 問題點", 중앙법학, 9(1), pp.223~247 (2007), 중앙법학회
- 경찰보호조치와 훈방조치의 법적 근거 및 한계에 관한 연구, "조국", 치안연구소, ~ (2003)
- 조지 모소라키스, "소년범죄에 대한 뉴질랜드의 가족단위협의회: 정책과 현행 실무의 개관", 피해자학연구, 14(2), pp.89~138 (2006), 한국피해자학회
- 최종식, "소년법개정논의에 관한 비판적 검토", 형사정책, 19(1), pp.183~209 (2007), 한국형사정책학회
- 최호진, "개정 소년법에 대한 주요내용과 비판적 검토", 법학논총, 31(2), pp.241~260 (2007), 법학연구소
- 히라이 사와꼬, "보도와 인권: 특히 소년범죄보도와 관련하여", 경성법학, 17(1), pp.1~15 (2008)
- Morris, A., "'The practice of family group conferences in New Zealand: assessing the place, potential and pitfalls of restorative justice. in: Integrating a Victim Perspective in Criminal Justice", pp.207~255 (2000), Ashgate
- Morris, A., "Restorative Justice in NZ. in: Restorative Justice and Criminal Justice:Competing or Reconcilable Paradigms", ~ (2003)
- Morris, A., "Restorative Justice: What works? Towards effective practice and performance", Paper presented to a Conference on International Perspective: Restorative Justice in Northern Ireland (2000)
- Morris, A., "Reforming Criminal Justice: the potential of restorative justice. in: Restorative Justice: Philosophy to Practice", pp.11~32 (2000), Ashgate