경찰의 소년범 처리절차에 대한 비교법적 연구
Youth Justice by the Police in South Korea: A Comparative Perspective
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
On the basis of a comparative perspective, this study has explored the distinctive features of the youth justice system in South Korea. In particular, the research focuses on the investigation process by the police. There are a lot of studies which show the necessity of the police diversion for the young offenders at the early stage of the investigation. However, in South Korea, no explicit provisions are in laws, which allow the police officers to deal with juvenile delinquency by diverting them from normal criminal process. As a consequence, the police are in general reluctant to employ a diversion with various rehabilitation programmes. Young offenders as well as their guardians are not very cooperative with the authorities. As there is no legal provision for the police diversion including conditions and process, the juvenile diversion by the police cannot be conducted both efficiently and effectively. Furthermore, this cannot lead young offenders to be actively involved in rehabilitation programmes. In order to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of diversion for young offenders, as in England and Wales, Germany, and Japan, various conditions and process must be clearly and precisely provided in the relevant laws. More importantly, legal grounds for the police diversion should be created in the juvenile law.
Abstract
On the basis of a comparative perspective, this study has explored the distinctive features of the youth justice system in South Korea. In particular, the research focuses on the investigation process by the police. There are a lot of studies which show the necessity of the police diversion for the young offenders at the early stage of the investigation. However, in South Korea, no explicit provisions are in laws, which allow the police officers to deal with juvenile delinquency by diverting them from normal criminal process. As a consequence, the police are in general reluctant to employ a diversion with various rehabilitation programmes. Young offenders as well as their guardians are not very cooperative with the authorities. As there is no legal provision for the police diversion including conditions and process, the juvenile diversion by the police cannot be conducted both efficiently and effectively. Furthermore, this cannot lead young offenders to be actively involved in rehabilitation programmes. In order to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of diversion for young offenders, as in England and Wales, Germany, and Japan, various conditions and process must be clearly and precisely provided in the relevant laws. More importantly, legal grounds for the police diversion should be created in the juvenile law.
참고문헌 (39)
- 강동욱, "경찰훈방의 법적 근거와 활성화 방안", 경찰학연구, 13(1), pp.67~92 (2013), 경찰대학
- 김재민, "경찰의 소년범 다이버전 정책에 관한 고찰 - 회복적 사법 이념의 반영 가능성을 중심으로 -", 소년보호연구, 15, pp.219~252 (2010), 한국소년정책학회
- 김태명, "일본의 미죄처분과 간이송치 제도", 경찰법연구, 9(2), pp.25~55 (2011), 한국경찰법학회
- 김혁, "회복적 사법의 이념 구현을 위한 경찰의 경미소년사건처리", 경찰학연구, 11(1), pp.61~86 (2011), 경찰대학
- 김형훈, "경찰훈방", 경찰학연구, (2), pp.181~207 (2002), 경찰대학
- 류여해, "소년법상 소년사건의 처리방안에 관한 연구", 소년보호연구, 13, pp.285~307 (2009), 한국소년정책학회
- 학교폭력 예방 및 대책 5개년 계획 성과분석 및 개선방안 연구, "문용린", 교육과학기술부, ~ (2009)
- 문성도, "파출소장 훈방권의 법적 근거", 경찰대학 논문집, 15 (1995)
- 박상기, "형사정책" (2009), 형사정책연구원
- 박광민, "한국의 소년범죄의 동향과 그 대책", 비교형사법연구, 10(2), pp.451~474 (2008), 한국비교형사법학회
- 배종대, "형사정책" (2008), 홍문사
- 송광섭, "경미사건의 효율적 처리방안", 형사법연구, (19), pp.47~84 (2003), 한국형사법학회
- 오영근, "개정소년법의 과제와 전망", 형사정책연구, 19(2), pp.5~24 (2008), 한국형사정책연구원
- 이석연, "검사의 불기소처분의 헌법적 통제를 위한 시론 : 기소편의주의에 대한 반성적 측면에서", 법과사회, (6) (1992)
- 이창한, "경찰의 소년범 다이버젼에 대한 효과성 분석", 한국공안행정학회보, 18(4), pp.345~367 (2009), 한국공안행정학회
- 이춘화, "소년형사사건 처리절차의 문제점과 개선방안", 한양법학, (29), pp.95~114 (2010), 한양법학회
- 이호중, "소년범죄자에 대한 경찰단계의 비범죄화 정책제안- 경찰의 전문가 참여제와 회복적 공동체사법(Restorative Community Justice)", 형사정책연구, 15(3), pp.5~44 (2004), 한국형사정책연구원
- 학교폭력사건 처리시 선도조건부 훈방제도 활용방안 연구, "정현미", 경찰청, ~ (2012)
- 조국, "경찰 ‘훈방권’의 법적 근거와 한계", 경찰법연구, (1) (2003)
- 조윤오, "영국 경찰의 소년 다이버전 정책에 관한 연구", 경찰학연구, 12(3), pp.145~176 (2012), 경찰대학
- 최대현, "수사와 기소 기능분리의 원칙과 한계: 영국 검찰제도의 발전과정과 시사점", 경찰학연구, 12(4), pp.52~80 (2012), 경찰대학
- Albrecht, H. J., "Youth Justice in Germany, Crime and Justice Vol. 31, In Youth Crime and Youth Justice: Comparative and Cross-National Perspectives" (2004)
- Ashworth, A., "The Criminal Process" (2005), Oxford University Press
- Audit Commission, "Misspent Youth : Young People and Crime" (1996), Audit Commission
- Cole, G. F., "Major Criminal Justice Systems: A Comparative Survey, 2nd edn" (1987), Sage Publications
- Bottoms, A., "Youth Justice in Great Britain, Crime and Justice Vol. 31, In Youth Crime and Youth Justice: Comparative and Cross-National Perspectives" (2004)
- Bynum, J. E., "Juvenile Delinquency: A Sociological Approach (4th ed)" (1999), Allyn and Bacon
- Home Office, "Circular Introducing the Final Warning Scheme : Revised Guidance" (2000), Home Office
- Home Office, "No More Excuse: A New Approach to Tackling Youth Crime in England and Wales, Cm 3809" (1997), The Stationary Office
- Muncie, J., "Institutionalized Intolerance : Youth Justice and the 1998 Crime and Disorder Act", Critical Social Policy, 19 (1999)
- Pakes, F. J., "Comparative Criminal Justice" (2004), Willan Publishing
- Schur, E, "Radical Nonintervention: Rethinking the Delinquency Problem" (1973), Prentice Hall
- Straw, J., "Tackling Youth Crime, Reforming Youth Justice: A Consultation Paper on an Agenda for Change" (1990), Labour Party. Colin Sumner
- 太田達也, "일본에 있어서의 범죄피해자지원과 경찰의 역할", 제2회 경찰대학 국제학술세미나자료집 (2012)
- 川崎英明, "少年法改正と警察", 判例時報, 77(6) (2005)
- 川出敏裕, "非行少年の発見過程", 法学教室, (333) (2008)
- 司法協会, (2004)
- 服部朗, "軽微な"非行の取扱い―簡易送致の運用をめぐって", 法律時報, 63(12) (1991)
- 浜井浩一, "日本の治安悪化神話はいかにつくられたか", 犯罪社会学研究, 29 (2004)