경찰의 소년범 다이버전 정책에 관한 고찰 - 회복적 사법 이념의 반영 가능성을 중심으로 -
A study on the police diversion policy in juvenile crime - focusing on the possibility of applying the restorative justice ideology to the diversion -
0
조회
0
다운로드
26
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Police, as the gate-keeper of criminal justice, could deal with various juvenile crimes in the field. In those cases, it is very critical how police would response to the young offenders because police decision may give a life-long negative impact on them. That is just why the police diversion should be introspected in the course of treating juvenile crimes. Recently, Korean Police Agency has introduced a few diversion policy into juvenile justice system such as ‘Professional Involvement System’,‘Conditional Booking System’ and ‘Family Group Conferencing’ in the phase of police response against young offenders. These systems are closely related with the restorative justice. The growing concern for restorative justice in recent years reflect a dissatisfaction with the traditional criminal justice. To prevent not only young offenders from committing a second offense but also victims from suffering revictimization, the ideology of restorative justice should be reflected on the juvenile justice. Police organization should try to induce the procedural ideology of restorative justice into his juvenile diversion system, such as Inclusion, Balance of interest, Voluntary practices,Problem solving orientation. Additionally, for the development of police diversion policy, a few suggestions as it is following should be realized : Firstly, the legal ground of police diversion must be established. Secondly, the professionals and local community groups should participate actively in the police diversion program. Thirdly, the diversion program should be managed by the police who has the balancing and respectful attitude toward all partners.
Abstract
Police, as the gate-keeper of criminal justice, could deal with various juvenile crimes in the field. In those cases, it is very critical how police would response to the young offenders because police decision may give a life-long negative impact on them. That is just why the police diversion should be introspected in the course of treating juvenile crimes. Recently, Korean Police Agency has introduced a few diversion policy into juvenile justice system such as ‘Professional Involvement System’,‘Conditional Booking System’ and ‘Family Group Conferencing’ in the phase of police response against young offenders. These systems are closely related with the restorative justice. The growing concern for restorative justice in recent years reflect a dissatisfaction with the traditional criminal justice. To prevent not only young offenders from committing a second offense but also victims from suffering revictimization, the ideology of restorative justice should be reflected on the juvenile justice. Police organization should try to induce the procedural ideology of restorative justice into his juvenile diversion system, such as Inclusion, Balance of interest, Voluntary practices,Problem solving orientation. Additionally, for the development of police diversion policy, a few suggestions as it is following should be realized : Firstly, the legal ground of police diversion must be established. Secondly, the professionals and local community groups should participate actively in the police diversion program. Thirdly, the diversion program should be managed by the police who has the balancing and respectful attitude toward all partners.
참고문헌 (34)
- 경찰청, "경찰백서", ~ (2009)
- 김용우, "형사정책" (2006), 박영사
- 김은경, "새로운 다이버전으로서 회복적 사법의 실제와 그 효과 - 경찰단계 가족회합 실험연구 결과를 중심으로 -", 형사정책연구, 19(2), pp.93~145 (2008), 한국형사정책연구원
- 김재봉, "소년경찰 다이버전의 비교법적 고찰", 법학논총, 22(1), pp.9~30 (2005), 법학연구소
- 김향곤, "경찰단계 ‘회복적 사법제도’의 시범운영을 통한 소년사법제도 발전방향 모색", 법학논집, 14(2), pp.29~51 (2009), 법학연구소
- 박병식, "범죄피해자의 인권" (2007), 동국대학교 출판부
- 박상식, "범죄피해자와 회복적 사법의 모델", 피해자학연구, 13(1), pp.129~163 (2005), 한국피해자학회
- 박수선, "한국에서의 회복적 사법 ‘피해자-가해자대화모임’시범운영 사례", 법학논집, 15(1), pp.107~128 (2010), 법학연구소
- 배종대, "형사소송법" (2004), 홍문사
- 신동운, "다이버전 운동과 선도조건부 기소유예", 형사정책, (2) (1987), 형사정책연구회
- 신동운, "입문 일본형사수속법" (2003), 법문사
- 원혜욱, "외국의 회복적 사법제도의 고찰을 통한 우리나라 소년사법정책의 방향", 피해자학연구, 14(1), pp.307~324 (2006), 한국피해자학회
- 이금형, "국가의 미래인 청소년과 안전사회 구현을 위한 청소년 선도정책을 기대하며", 대한범죄학회 주관 한미영일 국제세미나 자료집 (2007)
- 이수정, "경찰단계에서의 소년 다이버전 제도 ; 그 타당성과 전망", 대한범죄학회 주최 한미영일 세미나 자료집 (2007)
- 이진국, "회복적 사법과 형사사법의 관계에 관한 소고", 피해자학연구, 14(2), pp.69~88 (2006), 한국피해자학회
- 이호중, "회복적 사법이념과 형사제재체계의 개편", 형사법연구, (22) (2004), 한국형사법학회
- 이호중, "소년범죄자에 대한 경찰단계의 비범죄화 정책제안- 경찰의 전문가 참여제와 회복적 공동체사법(Restorative Community Justice)", 형사정책연구, 15(3), pp.5~44 (2004), 한국형사정책연구원
- 정현미, "소년사법에서 회복적 사법의 운영모델, - 경찰과 검찰단계를 중심으로 -", 이화여자대학교 법학연구소 및 회복적 사법센터 주최 국제세미나 자료집 (2010)
- 조 국, "경찰 훈방권의 법적 근거와 한계", 한국경찰법연구, (창간) (2003)
- 조지 모소라키스, "소년범죄에 대한 뉴질랜드의 가족단위협의회: 정책과 현행 실무의 개관", 피해자학연구, 14(2), pp.89~138 (2006), 한국피해자학회
- 히로세 켄지, "일본의 소년법제", 대한범죄학회 주최 한미영일 국제세미나자료집 (2007)
- Allison Morris, "Morris and Gabrielle Maxewll, Restorative Justice in New Zealand : Family Group Conferences as a Case Study, A Restorative Justice Reader" (2002), Willan, pub.
- Daniel W. Van Ness, "Creating restorative justice, Restorative Justice and the Law" (2002), Willan Pub.
- Daniel W. Van Ness, "The Shape of Things to Come: A Framework for Thinking about A Restorative Justice System", paper presented at the Fourth International Conference on Restorative Justice for Juveniles (2000)
- Duff, R. A., "Restorative punishment and punitive restoration, A Restorative Justice Reader" (2002), Willan Pub.
- Gerry Johnstone, "A Restorative Justice Reader, Appendix A" (2002), Willan Pub.
- Howard Zehr, "Retributive Justice, restorative justice, A Restorative Justice Reader" (2002), Willan Pub.
- John Braithwaite, "Restorative Justice and a better future, A Restorative Justice Reader" (2002), Willan, pub.
- John P. J. Dussich, "Raising the Global Standards for Victims : The Proposed Convention on Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power" (2008), TIVI
- Lode Walgrave, "Restorative justice and the law : socio-ethical and juridical foundations for a systemic approach, Retorative Justice and the Law" (2002), Willan Pub.
- Lode Walgrave, "How pure can a Maximalist approach to restorative justice remain or can a Purist model of restorative justice become Maximalist", Contemporary for Restorative Justice Review, pp.3~4 (2000)
- Marc Groenhuijsen, "Current Status of the Convention on Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power, Raising the Global Standards for Victims : The Proposed Convention on Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power" (2008), TIVI
- Marshall, "The Evolution of Restorative Justice in Britain", European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 4(4) (1996)
- Randy E. Barnett, "Restitution : a new paradigm of criminal justice, A Restorative Justice Reader" (2002), Willan Pub.