「소년법」에서의 우범소년 규정에 관한 비판적 고찰
A Critical Review of Regulations on the Status Offender in 「Juvenile Act」
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Unlike other subjects of 「Juvenile Act」, the status offender under 4 (1) 3 of 「Juvenile Act」 can only be disposed the possibility of committing a crime. The regulations on status offenses are designed for the purpose of welfare intervention to emphasize the responsibility of the state and society for delinquency and to block delinquency early. However, due to the increase in violent juvenile crime, the notification system is being actively used and cases of abuse are being found. Contrary to the purpose of Juvenile Protection Ideology, regulations on the status offender are becoming an early entry into the juvenile justice system and adds to the social stigma associated with that system. Judgment regulations on the propensity and the reasons for fear of committing a crime are also unclear, so there is room for interpretation depending on the subjectivity of the judge. 「The Riyadh Guidelines」 and 「General Comments by the United Nations Commission on the Rights of the Child」 have expressed concerns about status delinquency. As a result of the National Report on the implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, the Republic of Korea was also advised to “Repeal article 4 (1) 3 of Juvenile Act on ‘crime-prone juveniles’.” The rules of the status offender can be used as a means of dissolving the protection of their guardians in combination with the notification system. Because status offenders and general juvenile offenders are treated in the same procedures, the status offenders will be subject to the stigma experienced by general juvenile offenders. Therefore, regulations on status offenders in 「the Juvenile Act」 should be improved. Some argue that the government should change its notification system to one of voluntary regulation or make the requirements clearer. But, the status offenders are runaway or crisis youths and so their welfare must be addressed. This should be improved by resolving the gap caused by repealing the regulations on status offenders, preparing an implementation plan for the provisions of ‘out-of-school juveniles’ and ‘crisis juveniles’ under 「the Act on Support for Out-of-School Juveniles」 and “protective children” under 「the Child Welfare Act」.
Abstract
Unlike other subjects of 「Juvenile Act」, the status offender under 4 (1) 3 of 「Juvenile Act」 can only be disposed the possibility of committing a crime. The regulations on status offenses are designed for the purpose of welfare intervention to emphasize the responsibility of the state and society for delinquency and to block delinquency early. However, due to the increase in violent juvenile crime, the notification system is being actively used and cases of abuse are being found. Contrary to the purpose of Juvenile Protection Ideology, regulations on the status offender are becoming an early entry into the juvenile justice system and adds to the social stigma associated with that system. Judgment regulations on the propensity and the reasons for fear of committing a crime are also unclear, so there is room for interpretation depending on the subjectivity of the judge. 「The Riyadh Guidelines」 and 「General Comments by the United Nations Commission on the Rights of the Child」 have expressed concerns about status delinquency. As a result of the National Report on the implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, the Republic of Korea was also advised to “Repeal article 4 (1) 3 of Juvenile Act on ‘crime-prone juveniles’.” The rules of the status offender can be used as a means of dissolving the protection of their guardians in combination with the notification system. Because status offenders and general juvenile offenders are treated in the same procedures, the status offenders will be subject to the stigma experienced by general juvenile offenders. Therefore, regulations on status offenders in 「the Juvenile Act」 should be improved. Some argue that the government should change its notification system to one of voluntary regulation or make the requirements clearer. But, the status offenders are runaway or crisis youths and so their welfare must be addressed. This should be improved by resolving the gap caused by repealing the regulations on status offenders, preparing an implementation plan for the provisions of ‘out-of-school juveniles’ and ‘crisis juveniles’ under 「the Act on Support for Out-of-School Juveniles」 and “protective children” under 「the Child Welfare Act」.
참고문헌 (24)
- 아동청소년 인권보장을 위한 소년사법제도 개선 연구, "국가인권위원회", ~ (2018)
- 김두상, "소년법상 우범소년 규정의 개선과 우범소년에 대한 법교육에 관한 고찰", 법학연구, 25(3), pp.1~19 (2017), 법학연구소
- 김혁, "조기 개입을 통한 소년 비행의 예방 - 우범소년과 불량행위소년에 대한 대응방안을 중심으로 -", 경찰학연구, 10(1), pp.103~130 (2010), 경찰대학[DOI]
- "박완주 의원실, 우범소년규정 폐지 필요성 토론회 자료집", ~ (2021)
- 박찬걸, "우범소년 처리의 합리화 방안에 관한 연구", 소년보호연구, 16, pp.71~105 (2011), 한국소년정책학회
- 법원행정처, "2018년 소년통고실무(개정판): 개요와 사례, Q&A", ~ (2018)
- 법원행정처, "법원실무제요" (2014), 소년
- 소년사건처리절차에 관한 연구, "오영근", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (1995)
- 원혜욱, "소년비행 예방을 위한 입법정책 - 우범소년에 대한 규정을 중심으로 -", 형사정책, 18(2), pp.375~398 (2006), 한국형사정책학회
- 이정주, "우범소년의 비행예방대책에 관한 연구", 박사, 법학과 형사법전공, pp.2012
- 한국소년법학회, "소년법" (2006), 세창출판사
- 田宮 裕, "注釈少年法" (2017), 有斐閣
- 河村 博, "少年法-その動向と実務" (2010), 東京法令出版
- 아동에 대한 국가 책임을 확대합니다, , 2019
- 교육부, "보도자료 제4차 학교폭력 예방 및 대책 기본계획 발표, 2020년 1월 15일자", ~ (2020)
- 가정 밖 청소년 인권보호 정책 개선 권고, 2017년 1월24일자, , 2017
- 국가인권위원회, "2019년 소년분류심사원 방문조사 후 제도개선 권고 내용", ~ (2019)
- 국회 법제사법위원회, "제18대 제289회 제3차 법안심사 제1소위원회 회의자료, 2010년 4월 22일자", ~ (2010)
- 우범소년 규정 폐지 권고, 2020년 12월 30일자, , 2020
- 뉴시스, "유범소년 규정 없애라..법무부 소년보호혁신위 권고, 2020년 12월 30일자", ~ (2020)
- 보건복지부, "보도자료 아동중심 아동권리 실현으로 아동이 행복한 나라를 만들어갑니다, 2020년 8월 28일자", ~ (2020)
- 여성가족부, "제6차 청소년기본계획(2018-2022), 2018년 3월 6일자", ~ (2018)
- "Juvenile Status Offenses: Treatment and Early Intervention" (2007)[URL]
- "United Nations Treaty Body Database CRC/KOR/CO/5-6"[URL]
